The heydey of SEO is over!
As a discipline it found a prominent place in the psyche of Web publishers because of the critical role the search engines played in driving traffic to Web sites, which in turn played a critical role in monetizing those sites.
But SEO was a victim of its own success. That success led to excess and with that excess came a threat to the efficacy of the very search engines it was intended to attract. Perhaps more importantly it caused publishers, marketers and various other content producers to lose the plot. They stopped writing for their audience and focused instead on producing stuff that only resonated with algorithms, not with people.
Let’s take keyword search as an example, because that is SEO at its most basic level. It was a pretty rational idea to try to identify what keywords were most commonly being searched for and then include those keywords in your story. And add them to the headline. And then add more and more of them.
Then the spammers joined the SEO party and put those keywords into content that had absolutely nothing to do with what the unsuspecting Web user was actually searching for. In fact whole businesses grew up based on generating traffic by matching keyword queries and directing traffic to shallow, low-cost, low-value content.
So, 200 or so algorithm tweaks later, Google shuts this down. The use of links is following a similar escalation to oblivion pattern.
The goal of Google and every other search engine is to have quality rise to the top (unless of course you’re willing to pay to be on top). So naturally their advice to Web authors is “write great content.”
But the search engines can’t really identify quality. What they do instead is first of all associate the quality of the content with the place it appears (e.g. you’re more likely to come up with quality on the New York Times than on eHow,) and secondly, try to predict quality based upon robotically identifiable characteristics of the content. For example, it may be true that 400-word stories are more likely to be of higher quality that 200 word items. But they can’t deal with the fact that you could say something brilliant in one graph.
If you’re a marketer or a PR professional, if you’re the digital guru of your organization or one of the new breed of content marketers, you can’t afford to just write something good and say “Here you go, Google.” What you need to do is to optimize in a post-SEO world and here’s some advice on how to do that.
- First of all your content needs a good home. Just putting it on your Web site isn’t enough, you should have an online newsroom as part of your site. That becomes the landing page where you drive traffic to your content and the place were you use some best practice SEO for Web sites in order to capture searchers. Make it interesting. One of the biggest challenges with search engine traffic is getting them to click on more than one document. Use photos, use video and if you don’t produce enough content yourself bring some in. Add a Twitter feed, YouTube videos or Flikr photos.
- You should also have a blog, whether as an individual or as an organization. A blog is one way to personalize your content. Take advantage of the unique writing styles and perspectives of individuals within your organization. De-institutionalize your content and provide another path to your online newsroom.
- You are not going to maximize your audience with search alone. Use social networks. Every new piece of content should give rise to several tweets with interesting excerpts from the document and links back to your online newsroom. One tactic that can be effective in building an audience is to not only use an organization account but also have individual accounts of thought leaders in your organization. This personalizes the messaging and makes it more social. (If you haven’t built a strong following on Twitter you can use PR Newswire’s Social Post to reach followers on our curated vertical Twitter accounts.) For B-to-B companies in particular, LinkedIn is becoming an increasingly important place to share information.
- It’s important to hit every social network you can think of that’s relevant to your business or your brand. However, quality beats quantity – it’s better to focus on a couple where you can really concentrate on building a following. By learning what types of messaging draw the most likes, or follows, or shares, you can refine how you use each network.
- Placement is another way to get lots of readers. I’m not thinking about the classic and expensive ad network type of placement. There are many innovative alternatives in the market today including recommendation engines, keyword buy options and sponsored and preferred placement on mobile and social networks. A cost effective approach for placement is to use a commercial newswire service like PR Newswire that has a robust syndication network. This can enable you to reach many targeted sites that may have a very selective audience specifically interested in your content.
So optimization is as important as ever, but not for the practice of SEO that’s all about keywords and links and gaming the search engines. Optimization has a broader meaning that starts with good content and good places to put it and then drives readers to that content through search, social and syndication.
Author Ken Dowell is PR Newswire’s executive vice president of audience development & social media.
Image courtesy of Flickr user TopRankOnlineMarketing.
13 Comments on Blog Post Title
great post Ken. What will happen to all of those black hats out there? Costume party perhaps?
I really think that you should do some more research as to what the white hat practices of SEO are. A lot of what you are preaching to do “Post SEO” have been common practices of the best SEO’s for years. What you are calling as reaching out socially is actually called Social Signals in the SEO world and your placement efforts… that is called guest posting. Before you write articles like this I think you need to be more abreast in the topic you are saying is dead.
Thank you for the laughs this morning.
I’m sure this “SEO is Dead” post will give your 5 minutes of infamy for rehashing the subject yet again.
Wish you the best Ken.
Hi Brooke – thanks for the comment. Ken isn’t able to post a reply directly at the moment but he sent me this response to post:
“The point is that there is a pretty wide breadth of activities available to PR practioners and marketers, as well as publishers to improve the visibility of their content. If you are only thinking about optimizing for search you’re going to miss it. I understand that state-of-the-art SEO is about more than keywords and links. But it is, as always, about how it relates to search algorithms that are changing constantly. If you’re really going to optimize you need to go beyond that and drive traffic through social, syndication and other tools that are not traditionally considered part of SEO. What’s really obsolete here is the SEO acronym because it doesn’t capture the full scope of promotion and optimization opportunities.”
What is absolutely hilarious to me is that Ken is utilizing the same practices he is preaching again in his post. He is inserting “keywords” or highly searched phrases into his article title to get more traffic to his page to resonate with the algorithms to have the post show up higher in rankings. The response you posted to my comment is a far cry from the content that was published. I really feel that this is nothing but a back petal to cover your butt because this article is wrong. The first thing that needs to be understood here is the definition of SEO, because I feel like this is clearly not being conveyed properly. The whole purpose of SEO is to increase visibility of websites through different techniques and strategies. One of the techniques you are pointing out in this article is Inbound Marketing. Inbound Marketing is the practice of utilizing social media and proper content placement to drive more traffic to a website. People who claim that SEO is dead are doing nothing more than demonstrating their pure naivety on the topic. The world of SEO is growing to cover more tactics and strategies to increase visibility. I just wish that you would have approached the topic in a different light instead of making false claims that you contradict in your content.
Good points, Brooke, and at the end of the day I think we’d all be in agreement in principle, especially with respect to the point you make about increasing visibility of websites through different techniques and strategies. We probably should have made more of a distinction between white hat approach, which you advocate and describe above, and the increasingly less effective strategy that focuses almost solely on link building.
This blog is written in the context of our business (press release & content distribution), and our goal is to encourage folks to think about the wide variety of audiences and channels to which we distribute their content, and to focus on creating content that will ultimately serve their readers well. That’s the way to generate the best results with press releases and other content, and it’s no surprise to anyone that we want our customers to be successful.
Lulz. The fact that this article is getting traffic with that headline makes me giggle. Keep up the irony!
Furthermore, it’s probably great for you that your SEO isn’t up to par. Otherwise you’d be getting a rash of $#*^ from the “dead” SEO community: http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2012/12/11/seo-the-inconvenient-truth/
Very well-said and briefly discussed.
I hope the sooner the people accept that SEO (practically) is dead, the better it is for their future. Just by saying that SEO has changed, upgraded and blah blah, will not make things easier or effective. SEO can now be considered only as a basic practice of optimizing pages/content on-site.
So what’s next when SEO is dead. Go social of course.
I agree, Andrew. Content needs to be “optimized” for the audience, and distributed accordingly. Search engines will follow.
lmao. How did you get here again?
thank you for writing.
maybe it’s time I fix my website in order to better