PR Newswire: news distribution, targeting and monitoring
Nov 9 2012

WASHINGTON, Nov. 9, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Today, the Project on Fair Representation applauds the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Shelby Co., Ala v. Holder, a case that challenges the constitutionality of the 2006 reauthorization of Sections 4(b) and 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act subjects certain States and political subdivisions to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which invades the sovereignty of these "covered" jurisdictions by requiring them to "preclear" all voting changes with the United States Department of Justice.  All of nine states and parts of seven others are subject to these provisions.

Shelby County is a "covered" jurisdiction because, in 1965, the Attorney General determined that Alabama was using a prohibited voting test and less than 50% of the persons of voting age residing in Alabama voted in the presidential election of November 1964.  As a result, Shelby County is regularly required to engage in the costly and burdensome process of submitting all voting changes, no matter how minor, to the Department of Justice prior to implementation.

Shelby County brought this challenge on April 27, 2010, arguing that Congress exceeded its enforcement authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the Constitution.  The lawsuit claims that Sections 4(b) and 5 were reauthorized by Congress in 2006 for another 25 years without sufficient evidence of current intentional racial discrimination in voting by "covered" jurisdictions.  Furthermore, by continuing to base coverage on voting practices and data from 1964, the reauthorized statute does not take into account either the substantial improvements that have occurred in these jurisdictions during the last four decades or that any lingering voting discrimination is the same or worse in non-covered jurisdictions. 

The Project on Fair Representation, a Virginia-based not-for-profit legal foundation, is providing the resources and counsel for the lawsuit. POFR provided counsel to Abigail Fisher in Fisher v. Univ. of Texas which was argued at the Supreme Court on Oct. 10, 2012.

Mr. Frank C. Ellis Jr., the County Attorney of Shelby County, Alabama, is available for comment. He can be reached at (205) 669-6783.

Edward Blum, director of the Project on Fair Representation, said, "Congress reauthorized the VRA in 2006 based upon the black voter disenfranchisement in the Deep South that existed in 1965, but those conditions measurably don't exist anymore."

In 2009, the Supreme Court avoided the question of the statute's constitutionality in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. One v. Holder, but signaled that Sections 4(b) and 5 of the Act may impose "current burdens and must be justified by current needs."

Blum noted, "The data proving remarkable changes in racial conditions in these jurisdictions are irrefutable: Criteria such as minority voter registration rates, election turnout, success of minority candidates, and other factors, indicate there is no meaningful and quantifiable difference in the voting rights exercised by minorities in the jurisdictions covered by Section 5 and non-covered jurisdictions. In fact, the evidence suggests that the covered jurisdictions offer greater opportunity for minorities to participate at the polls than non-covered ones. Congress knew this in 2006, but chose to ignore it."

Blum said, "It makes no sense today for Texas and Alabama, but not Arkansas and Tennessee, to be penalized by the federal government. Our system of government is not premised on some states having greater sovereignty than others"

Blum concluded, "The America that elected and reelected Barack Obama as its first African American president is far different than when the Voting Rights Act was first enacted in 1965. Congress unwisely reauthorized a bill that is stuck in a Jim Crow-era time warp. It is unconstitutional."

Attorneys representing Shelby County, Alabama are:

Frank C. Ellis, Jr.

Bert Rein

County Attorney

William Consovoy

Shelby County, Alabama

Thomas McCarthy

Wallace Ellis Fowler & Head

Wiley Rein LLP

111 North Main Street

1776 K Street NW

Columbiana, AL 35051

Washington, DC 20006

(205) 669-6783

(202) 719-7000

Contact: Edward Blum
(703) 505-1922

SOURCE The Project on Fair Representation



RELATED LINKS
http://www.projectonfairrepresentation.org

Questions?

Can I help you? Drop me a line and let me know. 

Blogger Services

Customized Newsfeeds

Don't let the name PR Newswire for Journalists dissuade you. This is a great service for bloggers. Any content creator -- whether you're a journalist, freelancer or blogger -- can set up a customized profile to receive releases based on preferences. You also have access to hi-res photos, media-only content such as media advisories and embargoed releases, and experts via ProfNet.

ProfNet

Need expert sources? Check out ProfNet, a service that helps journalists, bloggers, authors, and other content creators connect with experts -- at no charge. Sending a query is easy: Just fill out a form detailing the kind of expertise you need, how you want to be contacted, and your deadline. ProfNet will do the rest. You also can sign up for a weekly "tip sheet" of experts and story ideas. Visit ProfNet for more info or go directly to the query form.

ProfNet Connect

ProfNet Connect is a free, interactive online community where PR professionals, experts, and media professionals can network and engage with one another. Via profiles, forums and blogs, subject-matter experts can position themselves as the go-to source for content creators and journalists. In turn, content creators can search the site by keyword to find the experts they need. The site also features enhanced profile capabilities, allowing users to easily add multimedia components -- photos, videos, white papers and more -- to their profiles.

News Widget

Our widget allows you to display PR Newswire content on your site with very little back-end programming required.  You not only get the headline, but also the body of text of the news release, keeping the user on your site at all times.  In order to do so, the difference between our Widget and other widgets is at the end of the sign-up process, you will be provided with two pieces of source code -- one for the page where the Widget itself will be displayed and one for the pages that will display the body of text of each news release.  In addition, the sign-up process allows you to have 100 percent control over every aspect of the Widget's appearance, so that the Widget can blend in fully with the look and feel of your site. Still not convinced? Here's what one blogger had to say about the widget.

Search
  
  1. Home
  2. News Unfiltered
  3. Blog Posts
  4. Blogger Services
  5. Blogger Events
  6. Contact Us