Other News Releases in Health Care & Hospitals
Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Joins One of Nation's Largest Cancer Clinical Trials Groups
FDA Consumer Health Information: Food Safety Tips for Healthy Holidays
When Holiday Meals Aren't a Gift
Other News Releases in Not For Profit
Sky Foundation, Inc. Raises More Than $100,000 to Find a Test for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer
CORRECTION: Scarborough Research Partners With MMA to Give Brands and Marketers Deep Insights Into American Mobile User Demographics and Behaviors
Watchdog Group: Chrysler's Fire Sale Funded On the Backs of Cash-Strapped Taxpayers
Journalists and Bloggers
Visit PR Newswire for Journalists for releases, photos, ProfNet experts, and customized feeds just for Media.
View and download archived video content distributed by MultiVu on The Digital Center.
See more news releases in: Health Care & Hospitals, Tobacco, Domestic Policy, Legal Issues, Not For Profit
According to John F. Banzhaf III of Action on Smoking and Health, Supreme Court Hits Big Tobacco Hard in Pocketbook, Opens Doors to Much Bigger Verdicts in State Courts
WASHINGTON, June 11 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Supreme Court opened
the door to much bigger verdicts against the major tobacco companies in a
unanimous decision which said that many if not most smoker law suits
against the companies can proceed in state courts where damages tend to be
much higher, rather than in federal courts as the defendants had pushed
for.
"Smokers killed, disabled, or injured by cigarettes which they smoked
because of tobacco company's lies now have a better chance of obtaining
real justice in amounts which come closer to compensating them," said law
professor John Banzhaf of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)
http://ash.org, a legal action antismoking organization.
"Because the courts of many states have the potential for higher damage
awards than corresponding federal courts, tobacco companies have long
sought to transfer cases filed against them in state court to the federal
court system, even on the flimsiest of reasons. Here they argued that
pervasive regulation by the FTC provided a rationale."
But, explains Banzhaf, that justification, if accepted by the Supreme
Court, could have robbed state courts of virtually all of their
jurisdiction over product liability cases since such products are regulated
by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and sometimes also other
agencies. Moreover, said Banzhaf, the irony is that cigarettes are
virtually the only consumer product which is totally unregulated by the
federal government.
"State courts and state court juries which believe that illegal
deceptive tactics by major cigarette manufacturers annually cause the death
of almost half a million Americans, and cripple and disable millions more,
should be able to award the huge damages such actions warrant without
interference by the federal government," argues Banzhaf.
Prof. Banzhaf was one of the first to suggest that cigarette makers
could be successfully sued by smokers, and worked with attorneys like
Melvin Belli to bring some of the earliest law suits. His organization,
ASH, serves as the legal action arm of the antismoking movement, and has
championed such law suits for almost forty years. It also assists in law
suits against the tobacco industry.
PROFESSOR JOHN F. BANZHAF III
Executive Director and Chief Counsel
Action on Smoking and Health (ASH)
2013 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006, USA
(202) 659-4310 // http://ash.org
SOURCE Action on Smoking and Health













