Other News Releases in Domestic Policy
U.S. Census Bureau Daily Feature for Nov. 22
Congressman Fattah: Thanks to Specter, Casey for a Major Step Along History's Path
Leading Anti-Abortion Group Vows to Vigorously Fight the Senate Health Bill
Journalists and Bloggers
Visit PR Newswire for Journalists for releases, photos, ProfNet experts, and customized feeds just for Media.
View and download archived video content distributed by MultiVu on The Digital Center.
See more news releases in: Domestic Policy, Legal Issues, Public Safety, Not For Profit
D.C. Appeals Court Ruling Holds Second Amendment Protects 'Individual Right'
BELLEVUE, Wash., March 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A ruling Friday by
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that strikes down
the District's 1976 handgun ban and holds that the Second Amendment
protects an individual right to keep and bear arms is "a landmark for
liberty, and an affirmation that everything the gun rights community has
been saying for years is correct," the Second Amendment Foundation said
today.
The 2-1 ruling came in the case of Parker v. District of Columbia.
Senior Judge Laurence H. Silberman wrote the opinion, with Judge Thomas B.
Griffith concurring. Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson dissented. The ruling
holds that the District's long-standing ban on carrying a pistol in the
home for personal protection is unconstitutional. SAF filed an amicus brief
in the case.
In his ruling, Judge Silberman wrote, "In sum, the phrase 'the right of
the people,' when read intratextually and in light of Supreme Court
precedent, leads us to conclude that the right in question is individual."
"This is a huge victory for firearm civil rights," said SAF founder
Alan M. Gottlieb. "It shreds the so-called 'collective right theory' of gun
control proponents, and squarely puts the Second Amendment where it has
always belonged, as a protection of the individual citizen's right to have
a firearm for personal defense."
Judge Silberman's ruling notes that the Second Amendment "acknowledges
... a right that pre-existed the Constitution like 'the freedom of
speech'."
"Because the right to arms existed prior to the formation of the new
government," Judge Silberman wrote, "the Second Amendment only guarantees
that the right 'shall not be infringed'."
Silberman's ruling also observed, "The right of self-preservation ...
was understood as the right to defend oneself against attacks by lawless
individuals, or, if absolutely necessary, to resist and throw off a
tyrannical government."
"Judge Silberman's ruling," Gottlieb said, "reverses 31 years of
unconstitutional infringement on the rights of District of Columbia
residents, not only to keep and bear arms, but to be safe and secure in
their own homes. This is a ruling that should make all citizens proud that
we live in a nation where the rights of individual citizens trump political
correctness."
The ruling may be viewed at:
http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200703/04-7041a.pdf
SAF has also mirrored the decision on our site at
http://www.saf.org/dc.lawsuit/parker.decision.pdf
The Second Amendment Foundation (http://www.saf.org) is the nation's
oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal
action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately
own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more
than 600,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to
better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
SOURCE Second Amendment Foundation













