Greater Reliability Spurs Leading Companies to Choose Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Over Linux

VeriTest Finds Microsoft Windows Server 2003 More Reliable Than Red Hat

Enterprise Linux AS 3.0.

Apr 06, 2005, 01:00 ET from Microsoft Corp.

    REDMOND, Wash., April 6 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Microsoft Corp.
 (Nasdaq:   MSFT) today announced that industry-leading customers - including
 Fender Musical Instruments Corp., Independence Air Inc. and National
 Enterprise Systems (NES) -- have cited greater reliability as their reason for
 deploying Microsoft(R) Windows Server(TM) 2003 instead of Linux. Microsoft
 also announced findings from a report it commissioned from VeriTest, the
 independent testing division of Lionbridge Technologies Inc., that concluded
 Windows Server 2003 was more reliable that Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 3.0 in
 a simulated real-world usage scenario. The study findings confirm what many
 customers are experiencing in their deployment scenarios:
     -- Fender Musical Instruments. The iconic designer and manufacturer of
        electric guitars could not support its worldwide network of dealers and
        distributors on its existing Red Hat Linux platform. Windows Server
        2003 provided a scalable and security-enhanced IT infrastructure that
        increased efficiency, interoperability and ease of use.
     -- Independence Air. Citing high support costs on its previous Apache
        Linux e-commerce solution, Independence Air switched to the Windows(R)
        platform and realized 70 percent lower recurring costs and 50 percent
        higher developer productivity.
     -- National Enterprise Systems. The scalability and reliability of the
        Windows platform accommodated NES' growth plans. The company
        immediately experienced a 50 percent reduction in support costs
        compared with the Linux platform it previously used.
     "Customers have told us that kernel uptime or availability of a single
 component is only one factor in how they view reliability; real customer pain
 is caused by the system itself failing to meet its reliability requirements
 over time," said Martin Taylor, general manager of the Platform Strategy Group
 at Microsoft. "This study shows that when compared to Red Hat Enterprise Linux
 3.0, Windows Server 2003 is easier to maintain and predictable, and allows end
 users to access the resources they need in a timely manner."
     VeriTest Puts Reliability to the Test
     VeriTest assigned to IT administrators a series of tasks involving
 upgrading and reconfiguring systems, with the goal of improving the
 reliability of the technology environment. The test led to the following
 conclusions about the use of Windows Server 2003 versus Red Hat Enterprise
 Linux AS 3.0:
     -- Windows provides more reliable end-user service
        - Problem prevention. Windows Server 2003 prevented four times as many
          events that would have resulted in end-user service loss.
        - Service loss. Red Hat Linux end users experienced an average of 15
          percent more service loss time.
     -- Windows Server 2003 is more effective at troubleshooting
        - Trouble tickets were resolved 20 percent more quickly and 8 percent
          more successfully with Windows Server 2003.
        - Windows detected more than twice as many issues before the trouble
          ticket was received.
     -- Windows Server 2003 is easier to configure and maintain
        - Twenty-one percent more tasks involved in upgrading and reconfiguring
          the system were completed in the Windows environment.
        - These tasks were completed 37 percent faster on average for Windows
          Server 2003.
        - Changes to the Linux environment created far more dependencies and
          breakages (e.g., impact of patches on network services).
     "We migrated from SCO UNIX to Red Hat Linux about a year ago. We had more
 downtime in the first eight months on Linux than we had in the entire previous
 17 years of our company," said Matt Javorsky, chief information officer at
 National Enterprise Systems. "Migrating to Windows is eliminating the
 downtime, saving us money and providing the scalability that our growing
 company needs."
     Stephen Shaffer, director of software systems at Independence Air, said,
 "Maintaining a Linux-Apache solution required four full-time consultants at
 $115 to $130 per hour. They were the only ones who could troubleshoot it,
 which left us helpless on nights and weekends. Switching to Windows will make
 us self-sufficient and reduce recurring costs by 70 percent."
     "Microsoft understands the value of working with VeriTest as an
 independent organization that has the expertise and methodology recognized
 throughout the industry," said Katrina Teague, vice president of Marketing and
 Solutions at VeriTest. "We simulated a real-world medium-sized business
 environment with two independent teams of IT professionals who passed a
 thorough screening process prior to the study, so the results of this study
 are consistent with the experience of many customers in the real world."
     The complete VeriTest study can be accessed at .
     Founded in 1975, Microsoft is the worldwide leader in software, services
 and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.
     (Logo: )
     NOTE:  Microsoft, Windows Server and Windows are either registered
 trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. in the United States and/or other
     The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
 trademarks of their respective owners.

SOURCE Microsoft Corp.