Legal Expert Says State AGs Should Join Microsoft Settlement
STORRS, Conn., Nov. 6 /PRNewswire/ -- Leonard Orland, University of Connecticut School of Law professor and the author of numerous articles on the U.S. v. Microsoft case issued the following statement on the settlement reached today by most of the parties in the case: From a legal perspective, the settlement announced today by Microsoft, the Department of Justice and half the state Attorneys General in the landmark United States v. Microsoft antitrust case clearly makes sense. What doesn't make sense is the continued opposition by the remaining AGs. When Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly turned the screws on the contesting parties to reach a settlement in a tight time frame, she said settlement could be achieved if all parties were "reasonable" and pointed to the virtues of compromise "in light of the recent tragic events affecting our nation." Concessions were made on all sides. Not only do provisions in the agreement address each of the narrow charges left standing against Microsoft by the Court of Appeals, but Microsoft conceded far more in order to reach settlement than a court would have required of the company in litigation. That was enough for the DOJ and half the state AGs to sign on to the deal and put the case behind them. But the extremist parties who persist in dragging out the proceedings against Microsoft in these uncertain times by seeking unwarranted and draconian conduct remedies do so at the expense of their states' consumers, innovation, and the economy. MAKE YOUR OPINION COUNT - Click Here http://tbutton.prnewswire.com/prn/11690X11653463
SOURCE White House Writers Group
More by this Source
Brett M. Decker joins White House Writers Group
Aug 27, 2013, 12:15 ET
Browse our custom packages or build your own to meet your unique communications needs.
Learn about PR Newswire services
Request more information about PR Newswire products and services or call us at (888) 776-0942.