PR Newswire: news distribution, targeting and monitoring
 

Supreme Court Case Highlights Need for Regulatory 'Challenge Flag,' Says Veteran Environmental Attorney

 
 

--Justices now appear more interested in safeguarding the due process rights of regulated entities, writes LeClairRyan's James A. Kosch

NEWARK, N.J., Feb. 23, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court's willingness to take the case of a family that was sanctioned for filling a wetland on its property could signal rising judicial concern about whether environmental agencies are overstepping their bounds, writes LeClairRyan attorney James A. Kosch in a Feb. 13 column published by CorporateComplianceInsights.com.

In the column ("Will Regulated Corporations Earn the Right to Throw a Red Challenge Flag?"), the veteran environmental attorney outlines how provisions of key regulations—including the Clean Water and Clean Air acts—have been interpreted to mean that regulated parties have no right to go to court and challenge expensive and difficult directions handed to them by the EPA or other agencies.

Kosch, a Newark-based shareholder in LeClairRyan's Tort Defense Practice and a director of the New Jersey State Bar Association's environmental law section, likens the situation to the National Football League back when coaches had no ability to throw a red flag and challenge close calls on the field. Today, regulated citizens and companies "must often undertake extremely expensive response actions that may make little or no economic, scientific or technical sense," he writes. "The regulated party is further constrained into unwilling compliance because the same statutes provide for draconian civil penalties of $25,000 or more for each day [the regulated party] remains out of compliance."

However, the U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in the case of Sackett v. EPA, No. 10-1062, in which an Idaho couple decided that enough was enough and took their case all the way to the top. As Kosch explains, the Sacketts had planned to build a home on a half-acre parcel they owned. Prior to construction, they filled in what the EPA later claimed was a wetland. The EPA issued an administrative compliance order asserting that the Sacketts had violated the Clean Water Act. The couple was ordered to remove the fill material, restore the supposed wetland to its original condition and take other action or face penalties of nearly $40,000 a day.

"This case is interesting, not only because the Supreme Court accepted it after rejecting numerous similar challenges in prior terms, but also because of the way the justices questioned the government during the proceedings," Kosch writes.

While it will be months before the Court's decision is reported, the case might well indicate a growing concern in the judiciary that the due process rights of the regulated community are under threat, even in matters as ordinary as the Sacketts' project, Kosch writes. It might also signal a growing willingness of property owners and companies to assert their right to throw the red challenge flag at perceived regulatory excesses.

In football, the refs repeat a timeworn phrase each time they announce the results of a challenge: "Based on further review, the ruling on the field …" If the Sackett family does win, agencies will have more incentive to act reasonably and regulated entities might just gain the ability to mount a challenge. "After that scarlet challenge flag flies through the air," Kosch writes in the conclusion to the piece, "a court might find that, 'upon further review,' regulators have been arbitrary and capricious."

Read the full column at http://www.corporatecomplianceinsights.com/will-regulated-corporations-earn-the-right-to-throw-a-red-challenge-flag/

About LeClairRyan
As a trusted advisor, LeClairRyan provides business counsel and client representation in corporate law and litigation. In this role, the firm applies its knowledge, insight and skill to help clients achieve their business objectives while managing and minimizing their legal risks, difficulties and expenses.  With offices in California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington, D.C., the firm has approximately 350 attorneys representing a wide variety of clients throughout the nation.  For more information about LeClairRyan, visit www.leclairryan.com.

Available Topic Expert: For information on the listed expert, click appropriate link.
James A. Kosch
http://www.profnetconnect.com/james_a._kosch

SOURCE LeClairRyan

Back to top

RELATED LINKS
http://www.leclairryan.com

Custom Packages

Browse our custom packages or build your own to meet your unique communications needs.

Start today.

 

PR Newswire Membership

Fill out a PR Newswire membership form or contact us at (888) 776-0942.

Learn about PR Newswire services

Request more information about PR Newswire products and services or call us at (888) 776-0942.

Featured Video

 
  • Print
  • Email
  •   RSS
  • Share it  
  • Blog it  
  • Blog Search  

Journalists and Bloggers

Visit PR Newswire for Journalists for releases, photos, ProfNet experts, and customized feeds just for Media.

View and download archived video content distributed by MultiVu on The Digital Center.

Free Investing Newsletter from Investor Uprising!

Learn to navigate the world's financial system and profit from leading companies.  

Register for Investor Uprising, the people's investment site, for a free weekly newsletter, information, education and premium research including our latest IU Confidential Report - "All That Glitters: The Ultimate Gold Report".

Advanced Search
Search
  
  1. Products & Services
  2. Knowledge Center
  3. Browse News Releases
  4. Contact PR Newswire