Tech Industry Urges Congressional Supercommittee to Seize Opportunity to Spur Innovation as Key Tool for U.S. Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction
WASHINGTON, Oct. 27, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Six of America's leading technology trade organizations and their members today urged the bipartisan Joint Committee on Deficit Reduction to embrace a series of proposals that would help America's economy and debt stabilization by supporting innovation.
The recommendations were part of a letter sent to the Joint Committee today sponsored by TechNet, Business Software Alliance, Consumer Electronics Association, Information Technology Industry Council, Silicon Valley Leadership Group and TechAmerica. The letter included recommendations on tax reform, research and development, spectrum, smart deployment of information technology to reduce waste, high-skilled immigration reform, deployment, among others.
The Joint Committee, also called the "Supercommittee," includes a bipartisan group of twelve members of Congress and has until November 23 to draft the deficit-reduction plan. The Joint Committee was formed in response to the debt negotiations held by the Obama Administration and Congress during the summer.
The following is the text of the letter sent today to the committee and its co-chairs, Senator Patty Murray (D-Washington) and Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas):
"We write as American business leaders concerned by the direction, substance, and tone of our nation's policies and politics. We are hopeful that your work will help the nation emerge from this period of economic uncertainty stronger, more competitive, and with a clear window of prosperity for all Americans.
As leaders within companies that collectively employ millions of Americans and operate and compete around the globe, we know this country can do better. Thus we offer below our ideas for (a) addressing the nation's structural challenges in a fashion that will stimulate growth and job creation and (b) stabilizing the U.S. debt:
Create Jobs and Ensure U.S. Competitiveness -- Tax Reform
First and foremost, America's corporate tax system is globally uncompetitive and is woefully out of step with the world in which we currently live. Many of the companies that are signatories to this letter and the innovations that drive their businesses simply did not exist when the code was last revised in 1986. While the code has remained largely static over time (with piecemeal patches), the environment in which our companies operate has changed dramatically.
To attract – rather than lock out – capital and create jobs here at home, we must act in our short- and long-term interest. With regard to the first, we should take immediate steps to encourage U.S. businesses to repatriate the approximate $1 trillion in accumulated foreign earnings that are locked outside of our country because of an antiquated and punitive tax code. As a nation, we are much better off with those dollars being invested here rather than elsewhere.
In the long term, we must reduce the rate, simplify the code, and strengthen incentives for job-creating activities such as R&D, and transition to a competitive territorial tax system.
Globally, in just the past four years, most of the major markets with which we compete have reduced corporate tax rates and transitioned to a competitive territorial tax system. In fact, our largest trading partners—Canada, Great Britain, and Japan—have all done so to become more competitive. Further, this exact approach to tax reform has been urged by many who have closely studied the issue including the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, and the "Gang of Six" U.S. Senators who proposed a solution to the debt ceiling crisis this summer.
Stimulate Growth - -Targeted Investments
Second, there are other important steps that the select committee can take to stimulate growth, including making targeted investments. Not every dollar spent has the same effect on the economy. Thus, we recommend reducing or eliminating low-impact spending in order to create the fiscal space to focus on pro-growth investments. Within our companies we continue to invest in research and development even in tough times because that investment provides a rate of return that is a multiple of the expenditure. It is important that our government does the same. Thus, we recommend greater investments in those activities with clear economic benefits because of their transformative potential. Programs that support basic scientific research, improve our infrastructure, protect our intellectual property and create a 21st century workforce are smart investments.
Finally, government spending is unsustainable. We all face difficult decisions within our companies and making cuts is often the most difficult but also the most necessary. That is the case for the U.S. Thus, as the committee works to identify the best deficit reduction approach, avoiding the hard decisions, such as entitlement reform, would be a mistake. There are steps the select committee can take that will contribute significantly to deficit reduction, and provide long-term growth opportunities for our economy. Those steps include:
- Spurring Innovation and Job Creation through Spectrum Sales: The Congressional Budget Office estimates new authority expanding the Federal Communications Commission's spectrum auction authority to conduct voluntary incentive auctions (as included in S.911) could generate more than $24.5 billion. Making more spectrum available for mobile broadband, including recognizing the benefits of unlicensed uses, is a win-win-win-win, creating jobs, benefitting consumers, fostering innovation, and reducing the deficit.
- Strengthening the U.S. workforce to raise direct revenue: Studies across the political spectrum confirm that increasing the number of employment-based visas for highly educated workers will not only strengthen our nation's workforce and competitiveness, but could also generate direct revenues for the Treasury. Simple fixes such as awarding permanent visas to foreign-born students who earn doctorates and repealing the annual limit on the number of applicants per country who receive visas is simply good economics.
- Reducing spending through information technology: The Federal Government uses information technology to great effect. As has been made clear, however, there is a gap in power and productivity between Government IT and IT across the private sector. The federal government can reduce spending by more than $1 trillion over the next 10 years by adopting the latest technology-fueled private sector best practices in key areas, such as consolidating IT infrastructure, streamlining government supply-chains, encouraging adoption of cloud computing technologies, and reducing government energy use.
As markets lose faith in America's ability to meet its challenges and lead the world, investors look elsewhere and entrepreneurs fail to dare. We can do better. We humbly offer our thoughts on a few viable, but near-term and practical solutions. More importantly, we offer our commitment to working with you to move this great nation forward towards greater prosperity."
The full copy of the letter is available here.
The letter was also signed by more than 50 leaders from the technology sector including: Eric Davidson, President, American Automation & Communications, Inc.; Joseph Kopfman, Vice President, AMERICAN SYSTEMS; Robert Heiblim, Principal, Blue Salve Professional Consulting; Dave Hagan, President & CEO, Boingo Wireless; Scott McGregor, President & Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom Corporation; Mike Klayko, Chief Executive Officer, Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.; Robert Holleyman, President and CEO, Business Software Alliance; Rip Hanks, President & CEO, Centerpin Technology Inc.; John T. Chambers, Chairman and CEO, Cisco; Kim Polese, Chairman, ClearStreet; Jim Bazet, President & CEO, Cobra Electronics Corporation; Gary Shapiro, President & CEO, Consumer Electronics Association; Thomas Ardolf, President, Cybermation, Inc.; Don Means, Principal, Digital Village; John Donahoe, President and CEO, eBay, Inc.; Timothy Healy, Chairman, CEO, & Co-Founder, EnerNOC, Inc.; Dean DeBiase, Chairman & CEO, Entertainment.com; Dan Fulmer, CEO, FulTech Soultions, Inc.; Jay McLellan, President & CEO, HAI (Home Automation Inc.); Dean C. Garfield, President and CEO, Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), David Tschirpke, Founder & CEO, Innovative Audio, LLC; David B. Bell, President and CEO, Intersil Corporation; Mitchell Gaynor, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Juniper Networks; Shaun Cross, CEO, Lee & Hayes, pllc; Jake Sigal, CEO, Livio Radio; Fred Humphries, Vice President, U.S. Government Affairs, Microsoft Corp.; Ted Smith, Chairman and CEO, MIND Research Institute; William Nuti, Chairman, CEO and President, NCR; Jay Buchanan, GMM/Director, Electronics, Nebraska Furniture Mart; Lee Cheng, VP of HR, Head of OCEO, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Newegg Inc.; David Rodarte, President & COO, NuVo Technologies; Safra A. Catz, President, Oracle; Bruce Ballengee, CEO and Co-Founder, Pariveda Solutions, Inc.; Joshua Marti, CEO, Point Inside; Dan Squiller, CEO, PowerGenix; Eric Bodley, Vice President, PPC; Philippe Courtot, Chairman and CEO, QUALYS; Kim Folsom, Founder & CEO, ShowUhow, Inc.; Mary Dent, General Counsel, Silicon Valley Bank; Carl Guardino, President and CEO, Silicon Valley Leadership Group; Patricia Schoenberg, President, Spectra Merchandising International, Inc.; Daniel Pidgeon, Chairman, Starpower; Bruce Borenstein, Vice President, Sales, Sunflex USA LLC; Tom Werner, President and CEO, SunPower Corporation; Gary Yacoubian, President and Managing Partner; SVSound; Dr. Aart de Geus, Chairman and CEO, Synopsys; Philipp Humm, President and Chief Executive Officer, T-Mobile USA; Dan Varroney, Acting President and CEO, TechAmerica; Rey Ramsey, President & CEO, TechNet; Mark Luden, President, The Guitammer Company; Steven J. Sharp, Chairman, TriQuint Semiconductor; Peter Craig, Chairman, Valicore Technologies, Inc.; Timothy E. Guertin, President and CEO; Varian Medical Systems, Inc.; James Treleaven CEO, Via Strategy Groupo, LLC.