HOUSTON, Feb. 3, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- In Parr v. Aruba, a case that has been closely followed by the oil and gas community, a Texas court of appeals on February 1 reversed a $2.9 million judgment against Aruba Petroleum Inc., holding that the plaintiffs failed to establish that the company's natural gas operations constituted an intentional nuisance.
The suit stemmed from drilling and production activity in the Barnett Shale in Texas. The plaintiffs, who owned land in the area, claimed Aruba's natural gas operations caused them various personal injuries, mental anguish, and property damages. The plaintiffs' lawyers claimed the suit was the first fracking trial in the nation — even though most of the evidence presented at trial did not concern hydraulic fracturing.
At the April 2014 trial, the jury found that Aruba created an intentional nuisance and awarded the plaintiffs $2.9 million in damages.
But the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas reversed and rendered a take-nothing judgment. The court concluded that the plaintiffs failed to establish a claim for intentional nuisance because there was "no legally sufficient evidence that Aruba intentionally created or maintained a condition that substantially interfered with [the plaintiffs'] use and enjoyment of their land."
"Aruba Petroleum is pleased with the opinion of the appellate court, as we believe the original verdict was without merit," said James L. Poston, Aruba's chief executive officer. "We seek to operate in compliance with all industry health, safety and environmental standards, as we believe we did in this particular matter."
Aruba was represented by the law firm of Haynes and Boone, LLP.
"I'm happy for Aruba," said Haynes and Boone Partner Michael Mazzone, Aruba's lawyer at trial. "They are good people and should not have been sued for drilling and producing gas wells in the Barnett Shale. We appreciate their principled stand, and we're proud that we were able to help them get justice."
Mazzone tried the case with Ben K. Barron of Ben K. Barron, PC. Haynes and Boone lawyers Christina Crozier and Mike Stewart assisted during the trial. Anne Johnson, Nina Cortell and Christina Crozier, of Haynes and Boone, handled Aruba's appeal.
About Haynes and Boone
Haynes and Boone, LLP is an international corporate law firm with offices in Texas, New York, California, Chicago, Denver, Washington, D.C., London, Mexico City and Shanghai, providing a full spectrum of legal services in technology, financial services, energy and private equity. With more than 600 lawyers, Haynes and Boone is ranked among the largest U.S.-based firms by The National Law Journal. The 2016 American Lawyer Corporate Scorecard rated the firm as one of the top two handling equities work for non-U.S. companies.
CONTACTS: Nathan Koppel
Haynes and Boone, LLP
For Aruba Petroleum:
Fred Stern, Sunwest Communications, Inc.
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aruba-petroleum-wins-appellate-ruling-in-closely-watched-nuisance-case-300402015.html
SOURCE Haynes and Boone, LLP