Frost & Sullivan: Net Neutrality Distorts the Operator Investment Decision

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif., May 3 /PRNewswire/ -- According to recent research from Frost & Sullivan on the effects of net neutrality on consumers and the economy, net neutrality has the potential to distort the parameters built into operator business cases in such a way as to increase the expected risk.

(Logo:  http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20081117/FSLOGO)

Because it distorts the operator investment decision, net neutrality has the potential to significantly discourage infrastructure investment.  This is because investments in infrastructure are highly sensitive to expected subscriber revenue.  Anything that reduces the expectation of such revenue streams can either delay or curtail such investments.

"Broadband has been described as the new infrastructure on which the economy of the 21st century is being built," explains Mike Jude, Ph.D., Program Manager, Consumer Communications Services for Stratecast, a division of Frost & Sullivan.  "As such, its ubiquity, ease of access and cost to consumers are all of great concern to public policy and regulation."

In particular, regulators and legislators have expressed concern that operators may be tempted to discriminate in favor of their own services or those of third party partners to the detriment of competitive offerings.  

Net neutrality is, in fact, complex.  In the presence of net neutrality, operators would likely reduce investment due to the increased risk.  If operators maintained investment and simply recovered the costs associated with doing so from another source, those costs are ultimately borne by the consumer.  An operator denied the opportunity to generate service revenue would be forced to adopt other methods for covering deployment costs: These could include simply passing along the costs to the consumer, creating service bundles that limit consumer choice or passing the cost along to content providers.

"To the extent that consumers were unwilling or unable to incur such costs, net neutrality could, ironically, have the effect of actually reducing broadband penetration," cautions Jude.

Net neutrality acts like a tax on the Internet.  It imposes overheads on network operators, which, in turn, decrease network investments, providing less opportunity, not only for the operators, but also for those that use the operators' networks as well.

The report provides evidence to support the notion that net neutrality is much more complex than simply encouraging a level playing field. Policy that seeks to manage competition by influencing the investment decisions of operators could have a significantly negative impact on consumers, job growth and the economy in general.  The report will be of special interest to public policy makers, legislators, service providers and network operators.

If you are interested in more information on this study, please send an e-mail to Jake Wengroff, Corporate Communications, at [email protected], with your full name, company name, title, telephone number, company e-mail address, company website, city, state and country.

About Frost & Sullivan

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Partnership Company, enables clients to accelerate growth and achieve best-in-class positions in growth, innovation and leadership. The company's Growth Partnership Service provides the CEO and the CEO's Growth Team with disciplined research and best-practice models to drive the generation, evaluation, and implementation of powerful growth strategies. Frost & Sullivan leverages over 45 years of experience in partnering with Global 1000 companies, emerging businesses and the investment community from 40 offices on six continents. To join our Growth Partnership, please visit http://www.frost.com.

Net Neutrality: Impact on Consumer and Economic Growth

CCS 4-13

SOURCE Frost & Sullivan