LINC Shareholder Alert: Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action in Lincoln Educational Services Securities Lawsuit - Contact Levi & Korsinsky

A securities class action alleges Lincoln Educational Services' SEC filings touted 19.5% student start growth and raised full-year guidance without disclosing that enrolled students had stopped showing up for class, or that resumed federal student loan repayment obligations were already driving borrower defaults.

NEW YORK, Sept. 16, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (NASDAQ: LINC) that a securities class action has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased securities between May 11, 2026 and August 9, 2026. Submit your information now. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.

LINC closed at $30.77 on August 10, 2026, down $10.22 per share, or 24.93%, in a single session on unusually heavy trading volume. Shares had traded as high as $55.68 on July 7, 2026, during the Class Period. The deadline to move for appointment as lead plaintiff is November 10, 2026.

What the Company Disclosed

SEC filings stated that first quarter revenue rose 22.5% to $144.0 million, that adjusted EBITDA rose 85% to $15.5 million, and that revenue growth was "primarily due to a 18.2% increase in average student population driven by 19.5% start growth." On the same day, the Company raised its full-year student start growth guidance to 10% to 14%.

What Plaintiffs Allege Was Missing

The complaint challenges those disclosures as materially incomplete. According to the action, investors were not told that the admissions process was no longer effectively converting enrolled students into students who actually attended the first day of class. On August 10, 2026, the Company reported that second quarter enrollment grew approximately 9% while student starts grew only about 1%, and that it had "observed changes in the student decision-making process that affected conversion from enrollment to start."

Regulatory Reality and Disclosure Adequacy

Disclosure language indicated confidence in the start pipeline throughout the Class Period. After the Class Period closed, the Company attributed part of the shortfall to a federal requirement that student borrowers resume repaying their loans, which management stated had produced defaults among some of those borrowers roughly nine to ten months later.

Disclosure Gaps Alleged

• Class Period filings reported 19.5% first quarter start growth without disclosing that conversion from enrollment to start was allegedly deteriorating.
• Full-year start growth guidance of 10% to 14% was raised on May 11, 2026, and reiterated on August 10, 2026, even after second quarter starts grew only about 1%.
• Second quarter enrollment grew approximately 9%, a level that the Company said would historically have produced comparable start growth.
• Lower start volume contributed to a higher cost per start, an operating consequence the complaint contends was not flagged to investors in advance.
• The effect of resumed federal student loan repayment obligations, and the resulting borrower defaults, was not identified as a factor affecting conversion during the Class Period, the action alleges.
• Second quarter adjusted EBITDA of $12.7 million trailed the $15.5 million reported for the first quarter.

"Generic risk factor language cannot substitute for disclosing specific, known problems that are already affecting a company's operations. Here, the complaint alleges that Lincoln reaffirmed full-year student start growth of 10% to 14% while conversion from enrollment to start was already breaking down." -- Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Find out if you might qualify to recover losses or call (212) 363-7500.

WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, Levi & Korsinsky LLP has established itself as a nationally-recognized securities litigation firm that has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. The firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions About the LINC Lawsuit

Q: What court was the LINC class action filed in? A: The case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, governed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Q: What specific misstatements does the LINC lawsuit allege? A: The complaint alleges Lincoln Educational Services Corporation made materially false or misleading statements regarding the effectiveness of its admissions process and its ability to convert enrolled students into actual student starts during the Class Period. When the Company disclosed that second quarter student starts grew only about 1% despite 9% enrollment growth, the stock price declined sharply.

Q: Who are the defendants named in the LINC lawsuit? A: The complaint names Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and individual defendants including senior executives who signed SEC filings, made public statements, or certified financial disclosures under Sarbanes-Oxley.

Q: What do LINC investors need to do right now? A: Investors may gather brokerage records showing purchase dates, share quantities, and prices paid. Submit your information for a no-cost, no-obligation evaluation of your potential recovery. No immediate action is required to remain eligible as an absent class member.

Q: What documents do I need to to submit my information? A: Brokerage statements or trade confirmations showing purchase dates, share quantities, prices paid, and any subsequent sale dates and prices.

Q: What does it cost me to participate? A: There is no upfront cost to submit your information and review whether you may be eligible to recover. Should you choose to participate in the securities class action, they are generally handled on a contingency basis, with any attorneys' fees and expenses subject to court approval.

Q: What if I live outside the United States? A: U.S. securities class actions generally cover purchases on U.S. exchanges regardless of the investor's country of residence.

Q: What if I missed the lead plaintiff deadline? A: The deadline applies only to investors seeking lead plaintiff appointment. Class members who miss it may still be able to participate in any potential settlement or recovery.

CONTACT:\
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP\
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.\
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.\
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor\
New York, NY 10004\
[email protected]\
Tel: (212) 363-7500\
Fax: (212) 363-7171

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

SOURCE Levi & Korsinsky, LLP