Accessibility Statement Skip Navigation
  • Resources
  • Investor Relations
  • Journalists
  • Agencies
  • Client Login
  • Send a Release
Return to PR Newswire homepage
  • News
  • Products
  • Contact
When typing in this field, a list of search results will appear and be automatically updated as you type.

Searching for your content...

No results found. Please change your search terms and try again.
  • News in Focus
      • Browse News Releases

      • All News Releases
      • All Public Company
      • English-only
      • News Releases Overview

      • Multimedia Gallery

      • All Multimedia
      • All Photos
      • All Videos
      • Multimedia Gallery Overview

      • Trending Topics

      • All Trending Topics
  • Business & Money
      • Auto & Transportation

      • All Automotive & Transportation
      • Aerospace, Defense
      • Air Freight
      • Airlines & Aviation
      • Automotive
      • Maritime & Shipbuilding
      • Railroads and Intermodal Transportation
      • Supply Chain/Logistics
      • Transportation, Trucking & Railroad
      • Travel
      • Trucking and Road Transportation
      • Auto & Transportation Overview

      • View All Auto & Transportation

      • Business Technology

      • All Business Technology
      • Blockchain
      • Broadcast Tech
      • Computer & Electronics
      • Computer Hardware
      • Computer Software
      • Data Analytics
      • Electronic Commerce
      • Electronic Components
      • Electronic Design Automation
      • Financial Technology
      • High Tech Security
      • Internet Technology
      • Nanotechnology
      • Networks
      • Peripherals
      • Semiconductors
      • Business Technology Overview

      • View All Business Technology

      • Entertain­ment & Media

      • All Entertain­ment & Media
      • Advertising
      • Art
      • Books
      • Entertainment
      • Film and Motion Picture
      • Magazines
      • Music
      • Publishing & Information Services
      • Radio & Podcast
      • Television
      • Entertain­ment & Media Overview

      • View All Entertain­ment & Media

      • Financial Services & Investing

      • All Financial Services & Investing
      • Accounting News & Issues
      • Acquisitions, Mergers and Takeovers
      • Banking & Financial Services
      • Bankruptcy
      • Bond & Stock Ratings
      • Conference Call Announcements
      • Contracts
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Dividends
      • Earnings
      • Earnings Forecasts & Projections
      • Financing Agreements
      • Insurance
      • Investments Opinions
      • Joint Ventures
      • Mutual Funds
      • Private Placement
      • Real Estate
      • Restructuring & Recapitalization
      • Sales Reports
      • Shareholder Activism
      • Shareholder Meetings
      • Stock Offering
      • Stock Split
      • Venture Capital
      • Financial Services & Investing Overview

      • View All Financial Services & Investing

      • General Business

      • All General Business
      • Awards
      • Commercial Real Estate
      • Corporate Expansion
      • Earnings
      • Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
      • Human Resource & Workforce Management
      • Licensing
      • New Products & Services
      • Obituaries
      • Outsourcing Businesses
      • Overseas Real Estate (non-US)
      • Personnel Announcements
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Residential Real Estate
      • Small Business Services
      • Socially Responsible Investing
      • Surveys, Polls and Research
      • Trade Show News
      • General Business Overview

      • View All General Business

  • Science & Tech
      • Consumer Technology

      • All Consumer Technology
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Blockchain
      • Cloud Computing/Internet of Things
      • Computer Electronics
      • Computer Hardware
      • Computer Software
      • Consumer Electronics
      • Cryptocurrency
      • Data Analytics
      • Electronic Commerce
      • Electronic Gaming
      • Financial Technology
      • Mobile Entertainment
      • Multimedia & Internet
      • Peripherals
      • Social Media
      • STEM (Science, Tech, Engineering, Math)
      • Supply Chain/Logistics
      • Wireless Communications
      • Consumer Technology Overview

      • View All Consumer Technology

      • Energy & Natural Resources

      • All Energy
      • Alternative Energies
      • Chemical
      • Electrical Utilities
      • Gas
      • General Manufacturing
      • Mining
      • Mining & Metals
      • Oil & Energy
      • Oil and Gas Discoveries
      • Utilities
      • Water Utilities
      • Energy & Natural Resources Overview

      • View All Energy & Natural Resources

      • Environ­ment

      • All Environ­ment
      • Conservation & Recycling
      • Environmental Issues
      • Environmental Policy
      • Environmental Products & Services
      • Green Technology
      • Natural Disasters
      • Environ­ment Overview

      • View All Environ­ment

      • Heavy Industry & Manufacturing

      • All Heavy Industry & Manufacturing
      • Aerospace & Defense
      • Agriculture
      • Chemical
      • Construction & Building
      • General Manufacturing
      • HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning)
      • Machinery
      • Machine Tools, Metalworking and Metallurgy
      • Mining
      • Mining & Metals
      • Paper, Forest Products & Containers
      • Precious Metals
      • Textiles
      • Tobacco
      • Heavy Industry & Manufacturing Overview

      • View All Heavy Industry & Manufacturing

      • Telecomm­unications

      • All Telecomm­unications
      • Carriers and Services
      • Mobile Entertainment
      • Networks
      • Peripherals
      • Telecommunications Equipment
      • Telecommunications Industry
      • VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol)
      • Wireless Communications
      • Telecomm­unications Overview

      • View All Telecomm­unications

  • Lifestyle & Health
      • Consumer Products & Retail

      • All Consumer Products & Retail
      • Animals & Pets
      • Beers, Wines and Spirits
      • Beverages
      • Bridal Services
      • Cannabis
      • Cosmetics and Personal Care
      • Fashion
      • Food & Beverages
      • Furniture and Furnishings
      • Home Improvement
      • Household, Consumer & Cosmetics
      • Household Products
      • Jewelry
      • Non-Alcoholic Beverages
      • Office Products
      • Organic Food
      • Product Recalls
      • Restaurants
      • Retail
      • Supermarkets
      • Toys
      • Consumer Products & Retail Overview

      • View All Consumer Products & Retail

      • Entertain­ment & Media

      • All Entertain­ment & Media
      • Advertising
      • Art
      • Books
      • Entertainment
      • Film and Motion Picture
      • Magazines
      • Music
      • Publishing & Information Services
      • Radio & Podcast
      • Television
      • Entertain­ment & Media Overview

      • View All Entertain­ment & Media

      • Health

      • All Health
      • Biometrics
      • Biotechnology
      • Clinical Trials & Medical Discoveries
      • Dentistry
      • FDA Approval
      • Fitness/Wellness
      • Health Care & Hospitals
      • Health Insurance
      • Infection Control
      • International Medical Approval
      • Medical Equipment
      • Medical Pharmaceuticals
      • Mental Health
      • Pharmaceuticals
      • Supplementary Medicine
      • Health Overview

      • View All Health

      • Sports

      • All Sports
      • General Sports
      • Outdoors, Camping & Hiking
      • Sporting Events
      • Sports Equipment & Accessories
      • Sports Overview

      • View All Sports

      • Travel

      • All Travel
      • Amusement Parks and Tourist Attractions
      • Gambling & Casinos
      • Hotels and Resorts
      • Leisure & Tourism
      • Outdoors, Camping & Hiking
      • Passenger Aviation
      • Travel Industry
      • Travel Overview

      • View All Travel

  • Policy & Public Interest
      • Policy & Public Interest

      • All Policy & Public Interest
      • Advocacy Group Opinion
      • Animal Welfare
      • Congressional & Presidential Campaigns
      • Corporate Social Responsibility
      • Domestic Policy
      • Economic News, Trends, Analysis
      • Education
      • Environmental
      • European Government
      • FDA Approval
      • Federal and State Legislation
      • Federal Executive Branch & Agency
      • Foreign Policy & International Affairs
      • Homeland Security
      • Labor & Union
      • Legal Issues
      • Natural Disasters
      • Not For Profit
      • Patent Law
      • Public Safety
      • Trade Policy
      • U.S. State Policy
      • Policy & Public Interest Overview

      • View All Policy & Public Interest

  • People & Culture
      • People & Culture

      • All People & Culture
      • Aboriginal, First Nations & Native American
      • African American
      • Asian American
      • Children
      • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
      • Hispanic
      • Lesbian, Gay & Bisexual
      • Men's Interest
      • People with Disabilities
      • Religion
      • Senior Citizens
      • Veterans
      • Women
      • People & Culture Overview

      • View All People & Culture

      • In-Language News

      • Arabic
      • español
      • português
      • Česko
      • Danmark
      • Deutschland
      • España
      • France
      • Italia
      • Nederland
      • Norge
      • Polska
      • Portugal
      • Россия
      • Slovensko
      • Suomi
      • Sverige
  • Explore Our Platform
  • Plan Campaigns
  • Create with AI
  • Distribute Press Releases
  • Amplify Content
  • All Products
  • General Inquiries
  • Editorial Bureaus
  • Partnerships
  • Media Inquiries
  • Worldwide Offices
  • Hamburger menu
  • PR Newswire: news distribution, targeting and monitoring
  • Send a Release
    • ALL CONTACT INFO
    • Contact Us

      888-776-0942
      from 8 AM - 10 PM ET

  • Send a Release
  • Client Login
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Journalists
  • RSS
  • News in Focus
    • Browse All News
    • Multimedia Gallery
    • Trending Topics
  • Business & Money
    • Auto & Transportation
    • Business Technology
    • Entertain­ment & Media
    • Financial Services & Investing
    • General Business
  • Science & Tech
    • Consumer Technology
    • Energy & Natural Resources
    • Environ­ment
    • Heavy Industry & Manufacturing
    • Telecomm­unications
  • Lifestyle & Health
    • Consumer Products & Retail
    • Entertain­ment & Media
    • Health
    • Sports
    • Travel
  • Policy & Public Interest
  • People & Culture
    • People & Culture
  • Send a Release
  • Client Login
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Journalists
  • RSS
  • Explore Our Platform
  • Plan Campaigns
  • Create with AI
  • Distribute Press Releases
  • Amplify Content
  • All Products
  • Send a Release
  • Client Login
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Journalists
  • RSS
  • General Inquiries
  • Editorial Bureaus
  • Partnerships
  • Media Inquiries
  • Worldwide Offices
  • Send a Release
  • Client Login
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Journalists
  • RSS

New NI 43-101 Resource Estimate Significantly Increases CuMo Deposit With Substantial Increases in Silver and Copper


News provided by

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited

Apr 27, 2011, 08:35 ET

Share this article

Share toX

Share this article

Share toX

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, April 27, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited (TSX.V: MSQ; USOTCQX: MQCMF – "Mosquito" or the "Company")  is pleased to announce that Mr. Shaun M. Dykes, M.Sc. (Eng), P. Geo, Exploration Manager and Director of Mosquito and Mosquito's qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 has  reported the results of a new 43-101 compliant independent mineral resource estimate for Mosquito's CuMo porphyry molybdenum-copper-silver deposit located in Idaho. Snowden Mining Industry Consultants (Snowden), an independent, internationally recognized mineral industry consultant, completed the estimate. The results represent a significant addition to the 2009 resource estimate, most notably substantial increases to the silver and copper estimates, and cover only approximately 60% of the mineralizing system's footprint identified to date.

The results confirm that CuMo is the largest unmined open pit molybdenum deposit in the world, and also one of the world's largest silver deposits, ranking behind the Navidad and the Pitarrilla silver projects.

The NI 43-101 compliant calculation confirms that the CUMO deposit contains, at a $2.50 cutoff:

TABLE 1

Indicated

Inferred

Metal

2.14

2.34

billion pounds of molybdenum oxide(MoO3),

3.27

5.55

billion pounds of copper (Cu),

140.7

242.5

million ounces of silver (Ag) and

158.2

90.9

million pounds of tungsten(W)




2.03

3.95

billion tons

within an Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource. (See notes for reason for using this cutoff)

This represents the following increases over previous resource estimates (Giroux 2009):

65.3% increase in ounces of Silver (Ag)

57.0% increase in pounds of Copper (Cu),

12.9% increase in pounds Molybdenum Oxide (MoO3), and

Very little change in the tungsten pounds

"I am extremely pleased with the results of CuMo's new 43-101 mineral resource estimate. Together with an increase in the indicated and inferred molybdenum resource, the silver and copper estimates significantly increase CuMo's previous valuations. In addition, independent metallurgical studies show that this deposit offers the potential for high percentage recoveries of these metals. The increases in silver and copper were expected, as recent drilling has outlined an older copper-silver system into which the main molybdenum system intruded," stated Mr. Dykes.

The overall estimated mineral resource is divided into two categories:

TABLE 2a

Category

Cutoff

   RCV

Zone

tons

Recovered
MoS2

Recovered
Cu

MoS2

Cu

Ag

W


grade


millions

Equiv. %*

Equiv. %*

%

%

ppm

ppm

Indicated

$2.50

Weathered

128.87

0.024

0.16

0.016

0.07

2.20

26.46

Indicated

$2.50

CuAg

465.69

0.031

0.21

0.019

0.10

3.03

27.59

Indicated

$2.50

CuMo

595.08

0.067

0.46

0.055

0.11

3.04

45.38

Indicated

$2.50

Mo

743.37

0.097

0.67

0.095

0.05

1.68

45.10

Indicated

$2.50

Footwall

92.70

0.055

0.38

0.056

0.02

0.74

25.22

Indicated

$2.50

All zones

2,025.7

0.067

0.46

0.059

0.08

2.38

39.06


TABLE 2b

Category

Cutoff

RCV

Zone

tons

Recovered
MoS2

Recovered
Cu

MoS2

Cu

Ag

W


grade


millions

Equiv. %*

Equiv. %*

%

%

ppm

ppm

Inferred

$2.50

Weathered

231.56

0.021

0.14

0.014

0.06

1.91

13.64

Inferred

$2.50

CuAg

1,913.4

0.019

0.13

0.010

0.09

2.51

6.48

Inferred

$2.50

CuMo

918.35

0.074

0.51

0.054

0.08

2.15

17.86

Inferred

$2.50

Mo

650.18

0.070

0.48

0.068

0.02

1.36

15.47

Inferred

$2.50

Footwall

233.17

0.058

0.40

0.061

0.01

0.94

14.68

Inferred

$2.50

All zones

3,946.7

0.038

0.26

0.033

0.07

2.11

11.51


The mineralized zones have different metal distributions, thus the overall average grades tend to be misleading due averaging of these zones.  For example: molybdenum is very weak to not present in the Copper-Silver zone, and copper is weak in the molybdenum and Footwall Zones. Mosquito's assay results also indicate the presence of significant quantities of Rhenium, a special metal, which due to the lack of historical assays could not be estimated at this time.

TABLE 3

Classification

Cutoff

   RCV

Short

tons

Recovered
MoS2

Recovered
Cu

MoS2

Cu

Ag

W


grade

millions

Equiv. %

Equiv. %

%

%

ppm

ppm

Indicated

$5.00

1,893.7

0.070

0.48

0.062

0.08

2.42

40.59

Inferred

$5.00

2,914.9

0.050

0.34

0.043

0.07

2.10

14.43










Indicated

$7.50

1,737.0

0.075

0.51

0.067

0.08

2.45

41.85

Inferred

$7.50

2,252.1

0.058

0.40

0.053

0.06

2.11

15.53










Indicated

$10.00

1,589.0

0.067

0.54

0.071

0.08

2.42

42.51

Inferred

$10.00

1,781.0

0.066

0.45

0.061

0.06

2.03

15.54










Indicated

$15.00

1,281.8

0.087

0.60

0.080

0.08

2.31

44.77

Inferred

$15.00

1,200.3

0.077

0.53

0.073

0.06

1.87

16.63










Indicated

$20.00

881.2

0.099

0.68

0.094

0.08

2.15

47.37

Inferred

$20.00

702.9

0.089

0.61

0.085

0.07

1.94

17.27


Note: *  Metallurgical study recoveries are  included in the recovered equivalent calculation.  

For calculation of Recovered  values (RCV), Cu Equiv., and  MoS2 equiv.  see description at end of Table 4.

A technical report detailing the CuMo resource estimate will be filed on SEDAR within the next 45 days.  Table 4, below, contains the breakdown of Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources for the CuMo deposit above varying cut-off grades.  

Snowdon's estimate is based on drill core assay results from 20,335.6 meters (66,718 feet) of drilling in 32 holes Mosquito completed between 2006 and 2010  and 10,178.8 meters (33,395 feet) in 23 diamond drill holes completed by AMAX between 1971 and 1981.  Due to mineral zonation the deposit was split into five mineral zones, or domains, one grading downward into the next: A weathered near-surface zone a Cu-Ag zone, a Cu-Mo zone, a Mo zone, and finally a footwall zone.  Copper and silver were highest within the Cu-Ag and Cu-Mo Domains, while molybdenum was highest in the Cu-Mo, Mo and MSI domains.  The estimated grade distribution for each variable was examined in each zone with erratic high grades capped.  Uniform 20-foot composites were formed that honored the boundaries of the five grade zones.  Variograms were assessed for each metal variable and anisotropic models were fitted to the data.  Grade estimates for each variable were interpolated into 100 x 100 x 50 foot blocks by ordinary kriging with parameters derived from the variograms models.  Specific gravities were obtained from drill core and the metallurgical bulk sample and average values were applied to each zone.  Snowden then applied a very conservative approach to resource classification by restricting the indicated classification to one-half the variograms' range only within the drilled area (interpolated).  All blocks outside of the drilled area (extrapolated) were assigned the Inferred classification irrespective of the variograms' range. A preliminary, conceptual pit design was applied to the overall block model and blocks outside of this preliminary design were removed from the results.

Mosquito has substantiated that the 2011 CuMo estimated resource consists of approximately 60% of the identified mineralized system covered by the property.  This is consistent with AMAX's findings in 1981 and is confirmed by Snowdon's resource calculation.  The current geological block model comprising 100% of the known mineralized system has a total of 453,998 blocks while Snowden calculated 276,244 blocks for a total of 60.85% of the blocks in the geologic model of the mineralized system.  A large portion of the 2011 exploratory drill program will be focused on drilling in the areas of the uncalculated blocks and improving the confidence in the resource.

CuMo is located in southwestern Idaho in an extensively logged, historic gold placer and lode mining area, readily accessible from nearby major centers of Idaho City and Boise. Mineralization consists of copper, molybdenum, silver, tungsten, rhenium and gallium. As a result of the multi-element nature of the mineralization, Mosquito decided to include both a copper and molybdenum equivalent for the estimated resource table. Both equivalents are required as the deposit is zoned, for conceptual purposes, as described in previous press releases and in the resource tables.  See notes below for explanation of the calculation of Recovered Value (RCV), copper equivalent (Cu Equiv.), MoS2 equivalent (MoS2 Equiv.).  The presence of the by-product elements copper, silver, tungsten, and rhenium is significant

Preliminary results of the exploration so far indicate that CuMo has a configuration that will potentially allow for low cost open-pit mining.  The thick mineralization is very continuous and indicates little internal waste and is persistent over a broad area measuring 2 km by 3 km. Mineralization begins at the bedrock surface which is covered by a thin layer of overburden and broken rock ranging from 4 to 20 meters thick.  The deposit is currently 650-850 meters thick and open to the south and west.  If further exploration substantiates these overburden characteristics, development would involve an unusually low strip ratio.

Immediate plans for the CuMo deposit are, to continue drilling to further delineate the mineralized zones and to convert the large part of the inferred resource to measured and indicated.  Engineering and environmental work will aim to produce a feasibility study in two to three years.  Drilling is scheduled to resume in mid-may  on Mosquito's private land.

Logging and sampling of the drill cores are completed at Mosquito's secure facility at Garden Valley, Idaho.  The entire HQ diameter core was sampled and cut in half longitudinally using a diamond saw. Half the core is sent for analysis, the other half has been retained and stored at the secure core storage facility.  Following cutting, the samples are delivered directly by Mosquito personnel to ALS Chemex in Elko, Nevada, a fully accredited analytical laboratory. They are first analyzed for 47 elements using a four acid digestion with analysis by Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma Optical Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS).  Copper and molybdenum bearing samples are then checked by using a larger 5 gram sample and analyzed using pressed powder pellet X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF).  In addition, duplicates, blanks, and standards are analyzed to ensure analytical accuracy and reproducibility. All rejects are being kept for further analysis and for use in metallurgical testing.

Drill hole location maps, an outline of the CuMo deposit and mineralized zone, an interactive drill hole model and a complete tabulation of significant intersections from the CuMo drill programs to date may be found on Mosquito's web site at www.mosquitogold.com.

Mr. Shaun M. Dykes, M.Sc. (Eng), P.Geo., Exploration Manager and Director of Mosquito is the designated qualified person for the CuMo Project.  Mr. Dykes prepared the technical information in this news release.  Mr. Ivor Jones (B.Sc(Hons), M.Sc., FAusIMM, CPgeo), Group General Manager of Geosciences, is the independent designated qualified person for Snowden who is responsible for the resource estimate.

On Behalf of the Board

MOSQUITO CONSOLIDATED GOLD MINES LTD.

Brian McClay

President

About Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines

Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited is a mining exploration and development company with a diverse portfolio of high potential precious and base metals projects, located in low political risk environments in North America. The Company's primary focus is developing its Idaho-based CuMo project, one of the world's largest molybdenum, copper and silver deposits. For more information about the Company, please visit www.mosquitogold.com and www.CuMoproject.com

THIS NEWS RELEASE WAS PREPARED BY MANAGEMENT WHO TAKES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ITS CONTENTS. THE TSX-VENTURE EXCHANGE does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This news release includes certain statements that express management's expectation or estimates of future performance and may be deemed "forward-looking statements".  These forward-looking statements include plans, estimates, forecasts and statements as to management's expectations regarding the CuMo Project. These forward-looking statements involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties and actual results may vary materially.  For these reasons shareholders should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking information.

United States residents are cautioned that some of the information that may be published by Mosquito may not be consistent with United States Securities and Exchange Commission disclosure rules and may be materially different from what the Company is permitted to disclose in the United States and therefore United States residents should not rely on such information.


Table 4a    2011 Indicated Resource Estimate for CUMO



CuMo WEATHERED ZONE - INDICATED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

$US 

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       136.28

0.015

0.06

2.17

25.84


25.021

37.531

171.305

8.623

7.043

2.5

       128.87

0.016

0.07

2.20

26.46


24.672

37.008

169.006

8.279

6.818

5

         98.79

0.018

0.07

2.30

27.57


21.692

32.538

142.119

6.618

5.446

7.5

         39.02

0.024

0.09

2.60

32.18


11.402

17.104

71.949

2.961

2.512

10

         14.20

0.033

0.11

2.71

40.36


5.661

8.491

29.866

1.121

1.146

12.5

            6.70

0.040

0.11

2.88

46.49


3.218

4.827

15.161

0.563

0.623

15

            3.37

0.044

0.12

3.03

50.70


1.777

2.666

8.337

0.298

0.342

17.5

            0.81

0.048

0.15

3.53

56.53


0.463

0.695

2.376

0.083

0.091

20

            0.01

0.049

0.20

4.09

70.51


0.004

0.007

0.029

0.001

0.001



CuMo CU-AG ZONE -  INDICATED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       484.86

0.018

0.10

2.99

26.59


106.746

160.120

968.770

42.239

25.787

2.5

       465.69

0.019

0.10

3.03

27.59


106.569

159.853

951.756

41.205

25.696

5

       364.60

0.022

0.12

3.40

30.99


98.258

147.387

853.810

36.118

22.600

7.5

       272.02

0.026

0.13

3.79

32.20


83.218

124.826

722.867

30.038

17.517

10

       172.27

0.030

0.15

4.25

31.06


62.066

93.099

520.060

21.355

10.701

12.5

         99.20

0.035

0.17

4.51

31.68


41.989

62.983

327.580

13.042

6.285

15

         50.57

0.040

0.18

4.74

37.45


24.280

36.420

185.511

6.995

3.788

17.5

         23.50

0.04

0.20

5.00

38.86


62.068

93.101

3.428

19.30

18.793

20

            5.65

0.052

0.19

4.91

38.72


3.538

5.307

21.749

0.810

0.438


Table 4a    2011 Indicated Resource Estimate for CUMO (Continued)


CuMo CU-MO ZONE -  INDICATED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       595.08

0.055

0.11

3.04

45.38


391.467

587.200

1343.053

52.825

54.016

2.5

       595.08

0.055

0.11

3.04

45.38


391.467

587.200

1343.053

52.825

54.016

5

       595.03

0.055

0.11

3.04

45.39


391.460

587.190

1343.011

52.821

54.014

7.5

       592.74

0.055

0.11

3.05

45.36


391.026

586.539

1340.042

52.672

53.778

10

       575.28

0.056

0.11

3.07

45.15


386.564

579.846

1312.257

51.541

51.947

12.5

       527.25

0.058

0.12

3.13

45.69


369.250

553.874

1232.882

48.198

48.185

15

       459.98

0.061

0.12

3.20

46.50


338.737

508.105

1107.224

42.959

42.780

17.5

       362.89

0.066

0.12

3.25

47.87


286.449

429.674

901.043

34.361

34.744



CuMo MO ZONE - INDICATED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       743.37

0.095

0.05

1.68

45.10


843.661

1265.491

777.684

36.339

67.047

2.5

       743.37

0.095

0.05

1.68

45.10


843.661

1265.491

777.684

36.339

67.047

5

       743.37

0.095

0.05

1.68

45.10


843.661

1265.491

777.684

36.339

67.047

7.5

       743.37

0.095

0.05

1.68

45.10


843.659

1265.489

777.681

36.339

67.047

10

       742.90

0.095

0.05

1.68

45.11


843.488

1265.232

777.448

36.321

67.027

12.5

       731.36

0.096

0.05

1.68

45.37


838.237

1257.355

770.434

35.865

66.368

15

       709.95

0.097

0.05

1.69

45.80


826.812

1240.217

753.477

34.953

65.038

17.5

       674.05

0.100

0.05

1.69

46.21


804.211

1206.317

717.663

33.130

62.296

20

       607.77

0.104

0.05

1.67

46.93


755.844

1133.767

645.319

29.535

57.048


Table 4a    2011 Indicated Resource Estimate for CUMO (Continued)


CuMo FOOTWALL  ZONE - INDICATED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

         92.68

0.056

0.02

0.74

25.22


62.419

93.629

30.651

2.003

4.675

2.5

         92.68

0.056

0.02

0.74

25.22


62.419

93.629

30.651

2.003

4.675

5

         91.88

0.057

0.02

0.74

25.25


62.293

93.439

30.547

1.971

4.640

7.5

         89.85

0.057

0.02

0.73

25.32


61.780

92.671

30.214

1.906

4.550

10

         84.31

0.059

0.02

0.72

25.40


59.752

89.628

28.945

1.763

4.282

12.5

         74.19

0.062

0.02

0.73

25.22


54.948

82.421

26.233

1.576

3.742

15

         57.97

0.065

0.02

0.77

24.34


45.492

68.238

21.483

1.294

2.822

17.5

         39.97

0.069

0.02

0.83

23.42


32.919

49.378

15.986

0.966

1.872

20

         10.88

0.075

0.02

0.87

25.67


9.828

14.741

4.928

0.276

0.559



All Zones-INDICATED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

   2,052.28

0.058

0.08

2.37

38.63


1,429.314

2143.971

3291.463

142.029

158.568

2.5

   2,025.70

0.059

0.08

2.38

39.06


1,428.788

2143.182

3272.150

140.650

158.252

5

   1,893.68

0.062

0.08

2.42

40.59


1,417.363

2126.045

3147.172

133.866

153.747

7.5

   1,737.00

0.067

0.08

2.45

41.85


1,391.085

2086.628

2942.752

123.915

145.404

10

   1,588.95

0.071

0.08

2.42

42.51


1,357.531

2036.296

2668.576

112.102

135.102

12.5

   1,438.70

0.076

0.08

2.37

43.51


1,307.640

1961.460

2372.289

99.244

125.201

15

   1,281.84

0.080

0.08

2.31

44.77


1,237.098

1855.647

2076.032

86.499

114.770

17.5

   1,101.21

0.086

0.08

2.24

45.78


1,136.571

1704.857

1730.170

71.966

100.829

20

       881.17

0.094

0.08

2.15

47.37


988.496

1482.745

1325.774

55.153

83.475


Table 4b    2011 Inferred Resource Estimate for CUMO


CuMo WEATHERED ZONE - INFERRED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

$US 

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       333.23

0.010

0.05

1.59

10.40


39.407

59.110

318.989

15.440

6.931

2.5

       231.56

0.014

0.06

1.91

13.64


37.618

56.427

280.916

12.868

6.317

5

       134.46

0.019

0.06

2.10

17.09


30.707

46.061

170.433

8.219

4.597

7.5

         50.63

0.028

0.06

2.01

16.80


17.191

25.787

59.461

2.972

1.702

10

         18.28

0.038

0.06

1.87

18.44


8.322

12.483

20.920

0.997

0.674

12.5

            9.02

0.041

0.07

2.18

24.12


4.430

6.645

13.077

0.574

0.435

15

            1.02

0.045

0.10

2.55

40.20


0.551

0.827

1.985

0.076

0.082

17.5

            0.11

0.046

0.14

3.55

61.89


0.062

0.092

0.315

0.012

0.014



CuMo CU-AG ZONE -  INFERRED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

   3,343.65

0.006

0.06

1.93

3.73


225.882

338.822

4302.279

188.364

24.914

2.5

   1,913.41

0.010

0.09

2.51

6.48


222.467

333.700

3521.830

139.937

24.781

5

       981.42

0.016

0.10

2.81

10.12


186.879

280.318

2053.585

80.531

19.862

7.5

       481.84

0.022

0.11

3.47

10.82


124.797

187.196

1105.455

48.730

10.426

10

       205.15

0.026

0.13

4.10

8.22


64.502

96.753

552.520

24.519

3.372

12.5

         59.29

0.034

0.15

4.19

3.60


23.867

35.800

182.790

7.248

0.426

15

         19.52

0.041

0.17

4.20

0.16


9.701

14.551

67.423

2.391

0.006

17.5

            6.57

0.046

0.19

4.35

0.00


3.652

5.478

24.415

0.833

0.000

20

            1.44

0.054

0.18

4.43

0.00


0.933

1.400

5.238

0.187

0.000


Table 4b    2011 Inferred Resource Estimate for CUMO (Continued)


CuMo CU-MO ZONE -  INFERRED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       959.33

0.052

0.08

2.08

17.10


598.501

897.751

1491.587

58.314

32.803

2.5

       918.35

0.054

0.08

2.15

17.86


598.501

897.751

1482.785

57.477

32.803

5

       916.90

0.054

0.08

2.15

17.87


598.293

897.439

1481.786

57.424

32.763

7.5

       877.32

0.056

0.08

2.18

17.74


590.376

885.564

1442.224

55.841

31.128

10

       766.76

0.061

0.09

2.24

16.58


558.628

837.941

1307.090

50.072

25.433

12.5

       647.39

0.066

0.09

2.27

16.52


512.189

768.283

1170.002

42.905

21.389

15

       563.14

0.070

0.10

2.35

16.37


469.540

704.310

1069.999

38.652

18.442

17.5

       472.30

0.073

0.10

2.37

15.66


415.383

623.074

939.060

32.635

14.789

20

       365.09

0.078

0.10

2.33

14.59


342.637

513.956

741.788

24.849

10.653



CuMo MO ZONE - INFERRED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       650.24

0.068

0.02

1.36

15.47


533.321

799.982

237.605

25.824

20.115

2.5

       650.18

0.068

0.02

1.36

15.47


533.315

799.973

237.605

25.824

20.115

5

       650.18

0.068

0.02

1.36

15.47


533.315

799.973

237.605

25.824

20.115

7.5

       615.55

0.071

0.02

1.40

16.27


522.950

784.425

237.393

25.052

20.031

10

       578.69

0.073

0.02

1.42

16.93


509.134

763.701

232.938

24.046

19.599

12.5

       531.92

0.076

0.02

1.45

17.70


486.345

729.517

227.932

22.428

18.828

15

       467.01

0.080

0.02

1.48

18.24


448.888

673.332

211.176

20.222

17.041

17.5

       351.50

0.088

0.03

1.57

20.52


368.914

553.371

191.247

16.053

14.426

20

       256.58

0.096

0.03

1.65

22.21


294.715

442.073

166.879

12.359

11.397


Table 4b    2011 Inferred Resource Estimate for CUMO (Continued)


CuMo FOOTWALL  ZONE - INFERRED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

       237.79

0.060

0.01

0.94

14.40


170.801

256.202

30.276

6.510

6.848

2.5

       233.17

0.061

0.01

0.94

14.68


170.336

255.504

30.276

6.398

6.848

5

       231.98

0.061

0.01

0.94

14.66


170.193

255.289

30.259

6.364

6.802

7.5

       226.76

0.062

0.01

0.94

14.73


168.628

252.942

30.055

6.218

6.682

10

       212.10

0.064

0.01

0.94

14.75


163.108

244.661

28.982

5.837

6.259

12.5

       184.32

0.068

0.01

0.96

15.04


149.509

224.264

27.255

5.163

5.543

15

       149.57

0.072

0.01

0.98

14.56


128.875

193.313

23.565

4.266

4.356

17.5

       122.47

0.075

0.01

1.00

13.03


109.941

164.911

18.528

3.561

3.193

20

         79.74

0.078

0.01

1.01

13.96


74.865

112.298

13.005

2.337

2.227



All Zones-INFERRED RESOURCE

Cutoff

Tons > Cutoff

Grade  > Cutoff

Contained Metal

RCV

(tons)

MoS2

 Cu

Ag

W


Million

Million

Million

Million

Million

 $US

(Millions)

(%)

(%)

(g/t)

(ppm)


lbs. Mo

lbs MoO3

lbs Cu

oz Ag

lbs W

0

   5,524.24

0.024

0.06

1.83

8.29


1,567.912

2351.867

6380.736

294.452

91.611

2.5

   3,946.67

0.033

0.07

2.11

11.51


1,562.236

2343.354

5553.412

242.503

90.864

5

   2,914.94

0.043

0.07

2.10

14.43


1,519.387

2279.080

3973.667

178.362

84.139

7.5

   2,252.10

0.053

0.06

2.11

15.53


1,423.942

2135.913

2874.589

138.812

69.970

10

   1,780.99

0.061

0.06

2.03

15.54


1,303.693

1955.540

2142.449

105.472

55.337

12.5

   1,431.94

0.069

0.06

1.88

16.28


1,176.339

1764.509

1621.055

78.318

46.621

15

   1,200.27

0.073

0.06

1.87

16.63


1,057.555

1586.333

1374.148

65.607

39.927

17.5

       952.95

0.079

0.06

1.91

17.01


897.951

1346.927

1173.565

53.094

32.421

20

       702.85

0.085

0.07

1.94

17.27


713.151

1069.726

926.910

39.732

24.276


Notes: RCV is a recovered metal value based on the grade and tonnage estimates described above.

$2.50 RCV cutoff was chosen as the base cutoff grade for comparison of global resource as it is the lowest cutoff value that has reasonable prospects of economic extraction.  Especially when current metal prices, (which are significantly higher than those used in the study) are taken into consideration.

Some of the Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding.

Due to TSX exchange rules only the cutoff can be reported prior to feasibility, not the actual values. A Copper equivalent (Cu. Equiv.) and Molybdenite equivalent (MoS2 Equiv.) are based on the following metal prices (all in US$):  Copper $2.10/lb, Molybdenum Oxide ($16/lb), Silver $0.35/gram and Tungsten  $0.22/gram.($7.00 per lb).  Other factors include 1% = 20 pounds; 1 ppm = 1 gm/T;  1000 ppb =1 ppm = 1 gm/T.

Molybdenum is sold as either ferro-molybdenite or molybdenum oxide.

The price used in these estimates is $16 per pound Molybdenum oxide.

To obtain the amount of Molybdenum oxide that can be produced from MoS2, the following is required:  convert MoS2 to Mo by dividing MoS2 by 1.6681 then convert to MoO3 (Molybdenum Oxide) by multiplying by 1.5. Therefore the amount of molybdenum oxide is pounds MoS2 times 1.5 / 1.6681.

Estimated metallurgical recoveries used in the calculations are as follows for each metal zone. Recoveries are slightly lower that those currently reported by SGS in their recent metallurgical study, as they have been adjusted by Ausenco to reflect losses anticipated during the cleaning and roasting stages.

TABLE 4


Zone

Cu%

MoS2%

Ag %

W %

weathered

60%

80%

70%

35%

CuAg

68%

85%

73%

35%

CuMo

87%

92%

78%

35%

Mo

80%

95%

55%

35%

Footwall

80%

95%

55%

35%


Formulas :

Recovery (recv) for a metal is taken from the above table for each assay/block in a particular zone and is  value percentage/100
RCV= ((Cu*20*$* recv)+((MoS2*20*(1.5/1.6681)*$(MoO3)* recv)+(Ag*$* recv)+(W*$* recv))
Recovered Cu. Equiv. =  RCV / ($(Copper) *20)
Recovered MoS2. Equiv. =  RCV / ((1.6681/1.5)* $(MoO3)*20)

Mineral Resources do not have demonstrated economic viability.

43-101 Resource classification definition based on CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions.

"A 'Measured Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity."

"An 'Indicated Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality. Densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed."

"An 'Inferred Mineral Resource' is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes."

MOSQUITO CONSOLIDATED GOLD MINES LTD.

MSQ-TSX-VENTURE

Tel: 604-689-7902

WWW.MOSQUITOGOLD.COM

FAX: 604-689-7816

SOURCE Mosquito Consolidated Gold Mines Limited

21%

more press release views with 
Request a Demo

Modal title

Contact PR Newswire

  • Call PR Newswire at 888-776-0942
    from 8 AM - 9 PM ET
  • Chat with an Expert
  • General Inquiries
  • Editorial Bureaus
  • Partnerships
  • Media Inquiries
  • Worldwide Offices

Products

  • For Marketers
  • For Public Relations
  • For IR & Compliance
  • For Agency
  • All Products

About

  • About PR Newswire
  • About Cision
  • Become a Publishing Partner
  • Become a Channel Partner
  • Careers
  • Accessibility Statement
  • APAC
  • APAC - Simplified Chinese
  • APAC - Traditional Chinese
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • Czech
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Mexico
  • Middle East
  • Middle East - Arabic
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Russia
  • Slovakia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom
  • Vietnam

My Services

  • All New Releases
  • Platform Login
  • ProfNet
  • Data Privacy

Do not sell or share my personal information:

  • Submit via [email protected] 
  • Call Privacy toll-free: 877-297-8921

Contact PR Newswire

Products

About

My Services
  • All News Releases
  • Platform Login
  • ProfNet
Call PR Newswire at
888-776-0942
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Information Security Policy
  • Site Map
  • RSS
  • Cookies
Copyright © 2025 Cision US Inc.