PZZA UPCOMING DEADLINE: Levi & Korsinsky Alerts Papa John's International, Inc. Stockholders of Securities Class Action - Contact the Firm

Disclosure Under Scrutiny: Were Risk Warnings Adequate? The securities action alleges Papa John's told the market it was managing a "cautious consumer" while allegedly omitting that its transformation was already failing to hold North American market share, leaving PZZA shareholders with a $5.11 per-share single-session loss.

NEW YORK, Oct. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP alerts investors in Papa John's International, Inc. (NASDAQ: PZZA) that a securities class action has been filed on behalf of shareholders who purchased or acquired common stock between August 7, 2025 and August 5, 2026. Submit your information now. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.

On August 6, 2026, Papa John's reported an 8.3% decrease in North American comparable sales, suspended its dividend, and reduced its 2026 North American outlook from a 3% decline at the midpoint to a 6-8% annual decline. PZZA closed at $24.64, down $5.11 from the prior close of $29.75. Investors seeking appointment as lead plaintiff must file with the Court by November 2, 2026.

What the Company Disclosed

During the Class Period, Company disclosure language indicated awareness of a "more cautious consumer" and a "promotional QSR marketplace," paired with statements that the strategic transformation was progressing. Guidance issued on February 26, 2026 projected North American comparable sales down 2% to 4%, consolidated adjusted EBITDA of $200 million to $210 million, and approximately $22 million in supplemental marketing and franchisee subsidies. The complaint challenges whether that combination of caution and reassurance conveyed the actual condition of the turnaround.

What Plaintiffs Allege Was Missing

The action contends that general references to consumer softness did not disclose specific, ongoing problems that management allegedly knew about.

Disclosure Gaps Alleged

• Alleged omission that the transformation was "taking longer than expected" and was not preventing continued market share losses
• Alleged failure to disclose that the rebuilt innovation pipeline was "not bringing in as many new customers" than internally expected
• Alleged omission that the Company had not "meet the consumer as much as [it] should have" on value and price
• Alleged failure to disclose that a sharp increase in promotional activity would be required to defend the Company's competitive position
• Alleged presentation of consumer caution as a general market condition rather than a measurable, worsening trend, as North American comparable sales moved from a 1% increase in the second quarter of 2025 to declines of 3%, then 5%, and ultimately 8.3%

Why Generic Warnings May Not Protect

Under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, cautionary framing does not shield statements that allegedly omit material problems already affecting operations. As pleaded, shareholders who bought at allegedly inflated prices may seek damages tied to the August 6, 2026 repricing.

"Generic risk factor language cannot substitute for disclosing specific, known problems that are already affecting a company's operations. Here, the complaint alleges that investors were told a transformation was working even as North American comparable sales deteriorated quarter after quarter." -- Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Find out if you might qualify to recover losses or call (212) 363-7500.

WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, Levi & Korsinsky LLP has established itself as a nationally-recognized securities litigation firm that has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. The firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions About the PZZA Lawsuit

Q: What court was the PZZA class action filed in? A: The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Jury Division, governed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Q: Who are the defendants named in the PZZA lawsuit? A: The complaint names Papa John's International, Inc. and individual defendants who were senior investors during the class period, including Todd Allan Penegor and Ravi Thanawala.

Q: What specific misstatements does the PZZA lawsuit allege? A: The complaint alleges Papa John's International, Inc. made materially false or misleading statements regarding the purported effectiveness of its strategic transformation and its ability to stabilize growth against a cautious consumer market during the Class Period. When the Company disclosed an 8.3% decline in North American comparable sales, a dividend suspension, and a cut in its 2026 outlook to a 6-8% annual decline, the stock price declined sharply.

Q: What is a lead plaintiff and why does it matter? A: A lead plaintiff is the investor appointed by the court to represent the entire class. Lead plaintiffs are typically investors with the largest documented losses. Being appointed does not increase individual recovery but gives direct oversight of how the case is run.

Q: What documents do I need to to submit my information? A: Brokerage statements or trade confirmations showing purchase dates, share quantities, prices paid, and any subsequent sale dates and prices.

Q: What does it cost me to participate? A: There is no upfront cost to submit your information and review whether you may be eligible to recover. Should you choose to participate in the securities class action, they are generally handled on a contingency basis, with any attorneys' fees and expenses subject to court approval.

Q: What if I live outside the United States? A: U.S. securities class actions generally cover purchases on U.S. exchanges regardless of the investor's country of residence.

Q: Can I join a different law firm's lawsuit instead? A: Yes. Investors may choose which law firm to contact. Multiple firms often file competing complaints. The court may consolidate related cases and appoint a single lead counsel.

CONTACT:\

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP\

Joseph E. Levi, Esq.\

Ed Korsinsky, Esq.\

33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor\

New York, NY 10004\

[email protected]\

Tel: (212) 363-7500\

Fax: (212) 363-7171

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

SOURCE Levi & Korsinsky, LLP