Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission Holds Corporate Officers Personally Liable for Sales Tax

The Petitioners, having financial troubles as a result of an attempt to expand their marina business, entered into a forbearance agreement with its bank. The Petitioners also agreed to a bank requirement that all inflows to be deposited into a bank-controlled account, including all sales receipts and sales tax, as well as hiring a bank preapproved consultant to help operate daily affairs. The Petitioners then acquiesced to the bank's procedure of choosing which creditors/vendors would be paid and when. The Department was on such priority list, but was at some point removed, which the Petitioners were aware. Subsequently, the Petitioners attempted to pay the Department for delinquent sales tax payments, but by the time the check reached the Department, the bank had already withdrawn all funds from the bank-controlled account.

Despite deflecting responsibility by showing the bank's and consultant's control of the marinas' operations, the Petitioners were still liable for the tax. By admitting they owned the marinas, were corporate officers, collected tax from sales at the marina, knew that sales tax was not being paid to the Department, were authorized signers on the accounts, and paid other creditors, the officers admitted to all three prongs for establishing liability of a responsible person under Wisconsin law.

The WTAC emphasized that when "a taxpayer collects sales taxes, that money is not his to use. It is to be held in trust until remitted to the state. The taxpayer cannot use that money to keep the business going or for any other noble purpose. Even if paying the taxes over to the Department brings hardship and leaves little hope of paying other creditors, the taxpayer still has no legal alternative." Accordingly, the Petitioners should have paid the sales tax to the Department as required.

The take-away here is that the collection of sales tax creates a fiduciary role for businesses and corporate officers and/or owners of a business to remit any sales tax collected to the appropriate tax jurisdiction.

^[1] Heckel v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Nos. 14-S-099, 14-S-100, 14-S-101, 14-S-102, 14-S-103, and 14-S-104 (WTAC 2016).

About Ryan
Ryan is an award-winning global tax services firm, with the largest indirect and property tax practices in North America and the seventh largest corporate tax practice in the United States. With global headquarters in Dallas, Texas, the Firm provides a comprehensive range of state, local, federal, and international tax advisory and consulting services on a multi-jurisdictional basis, including audit defense, tax recovery, credits and incentives, tax process improvement and automation, tax appeals, tax compliance, and strategic planning. Ryan is a five-time recipient of the International Service Excellence Award from the Customer Service Institute of America (CSIA) for its commitment to world-class client service. Empowered by the dynamic myRyan work environment, which is widely recognized as the most innovative in the tax services industry, Ryan's multi-disciplinary team of more than 2,100 professionals and associates serves over 12,000 clients in more than 40 countries, including many of the world's most prominent Global 5000 companies. More information about Ryan can be found at ryan.com.

Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20160125/325377LOGO

TECHNICAL INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeremiah T. Lynch
Principal
Ryan
212.847.0113
[email protected]

Available Topic Expert(s): For information on the listed expert(s), click appropriate link.
Jerry Lynch
ProfNet - http://www.profnetconnect.com/jeremiahlynch  

SOURCE Ryan

Related Links

http://www.ryan.com