Grant & Eisenhofer Secures $148 Million Recovery for Shareholders of Dole Food Co. Over Senior Executives' Deceit in 2013 Management Buyout

Ruling by Vice Chancellor Travis Laster finds that Dole CEO David Murdoch and COO Michael Carter undermined stockholders and misled board in taking company private: "what the Committee could not overcome...and what even an arguably fair price does not immunize, is fraud"

Aug 27, 2015, 12:56 ET from Grant & Eisenhofer

WILMINGTON, Del., Aug. 27, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- In a decisive shareholder victory, the Delaware Court of Chancery has found that the two most senior officers of Dole Food Co. Inc. breached their fiduciary duties in structuring a 2013 buyout of the iconic producer of fresh fruits and vegetables that drastically undervalued the company to the detriment of stockholders.

Vice Chancellor Travis Laster held that Dole CEO David Murdock, along with the company's chief operating officer and general counsel Michael Carter undermined shareholders and misled the board of directors in their handling of Dole's privatized buyout, which closed in November 2013 in an all-cash deal valued at $1.2 billion.  He ordered Messrs. Murdock and Carter to pay shareholders more than $148 million in damages.

While finding that Dole's board was able to push for a higher per-share price at the time of the transaction, Chancellor Laster wrote that "what the Committee could not overcome, what the stockholder vote could not cleanse, and what even an arguably fair price does not immunize, is fraud." 

Reviewing trial documents that produced more than 1,800 exhibits, the judge held that Messrs. Murdoch and Carter "made false disclosures" about numerous aspects of the buyout in order to "freeze out" other suitors even as the food industry was awash in deals.  By providing the board with "lowball management projections" and delivering inaccurate financial information to Dole's outside advisors and lenders, the two executives ended up "driving down Dole's stock price and undermining its validity as a measure of value."

The Chancellor's precise determination of damages is telling.  He noted that even assuming that the ultimate price of $13.50 per share that finalized the buyout engineered by Murdock and Carter, the stockholders are not merely limited to a fair price.  Rather, he wrote, "they are entitled to a fairer price, designed to eliminate the ability of the defendants to profit from their breaches of duty of loyalty."  Thus he found Murdock and Carter jointly and severally liable for damages of $148,190,590.18 – "representing an incremental value of $2.74 per share." 

And, he added for emphasis, "Although factually large, the award is conservative relative to what the evidence could support."

"We are extremely pleased not only with the large financial recovery, but the forceful way in which the court excoriated the defendants for the brazen way they tried to hijack Dole for their own advantage in taking the company private," said Stuart Grant of Grant & Eisenhofer, co-lead counsel for the shareholders.

In his 106-page opinion, Chancellor Laster found that two other key defendants – Dole president David DeLorenzo and the company's financial advisor Deutsche Bank Securities – were not liable for their respective roles, though he noted that Deutsche Bank "acted improperly by favoring Murdock and treating him as the bank's real client in transactions before the merger, even when Deutsche Bank was officially representing Dole."

The case caption was: In re Dole Food Company, Inc. Stockholder Litigation (8703-VCL, Del. Chancery Court).

In addition to G&E, shareholders were represented by Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, along with Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP.   Grant & Eisenhofer is also primary counsel for certain shareholders in the appraisal of Dole Food Co.

About Grant & Eisenhofer

Established in 1997, Grant & Eisenhofer is one of the top litigation and arbitration firms in the United States.  The Firm's clients include institutional investors, whistleblowers and other plaintiffs in securities class actions, derivative lawsuits, consumer class actions, antitrust suits, bankruptcy litigation and whistleblower cases involving the False Claims Act. 

G&E has recovered more than $28 billion in the last 10 years and has been cited by RiskMetrics for securing the highest average investor recovery in securities class actions. Grant & Eisenhofer has been named one of the country's top plaintiffs' law firms by The National Law Journal for the past 11 years. G&E was recently named one of the nation's Most Feared Plaintiffs Firms by Law360 for the second year in a row.  The firm has more than 60 attorneys, with offices in Wilmington, New York and Chicago, and an international docket of high-profile cases.  For more information, visit  

Allan Ripp 212-262-7477
Elise Martin 302-622-7004

SOURCE Grant & Eisenhofer