Large Bipartisan Majorities Favor Growing Trade Through International Agreements, Survey Finds

News provided by

Jun 26, 2019, 08:45 ET

COLLEGE PARK, Md., June 26, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- A new in-depth survey from the Program for Public Consultation at the University of Maryland finds that large majorities of Americans have concerns about the impact of international trade on the US economy, job security, and inequality, but an overwhelming 87% support the US, together with other countries, continuing to promote the growth of trade through a set of agreed-upon rules that seek to lower barriers to trade and ensure trade is done fairly. This includes 84% of Republicans as well as 93% of Democrats.

A large majority—72%—also approve of the US continuing to be part of the World Trade Organization (WTO), including 54% of Republicans and 89% of Democrats. Similarly, 72% approve of the US being part of NAFTA, including 55% of Republicans and 88% of Democrats.

To address the negative effects of trade, majorities favor efforts to mitigate its negative effects through more extensive job training, Trade Adjustment Assistance, and stronger labor and environmental standards in trade agreements.

"Americans see international trade as having both major costs and major benefits, which may create an impression that support for trade is weak," commented Steven Kull, director of PPC. "But, ultimately Americans come down firmly on the side of continuing the post-war program of furthering the growth of trade through an international rules-based system. Rather than putting the brakes on trade they favor other means to mitigate its negative effects."

The survey found robust support for various means to mitigate the negative effects of trade:

Eight in ten favor new legislative proposals to increase spending to train more Americans in new fields, including cybersecurity and the energy industry, and to provide tax credits for apprenticeship programs.
Six in ten favor expanding Trade Adjustment Assistance to provide training and support for more people who get laid off from their job because of an increase in trade.
Over seven in ten favor increasing the amount of unemployment benefits.
Nearly nine in ten favor including in new international trade agreements the requirement that countries abide by both the labor and environmental standards they have committed to, that they do not lower their standards to attract business or to get a competitive edge, and that there is an effective system for enforcing these requirements.

Contrary to the bipartisan consensus on broader principles, for many foreground trade issues that have been immersed in partisan conflict, the public has divided along party lines:

After hearing the main terms of the proposed USMCA agreement to replace NAFTA, 64% of Republicans favor it while 54% of Democrats are opposed; overall 53% favor it.
On the US administration invoking the national security exemption and imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum, three-quarters of Republicans approve, while 70% of Democrats disapprove; overall 51% approve.
Over three-quarters of Republicans approve of the administration imposing tariffs on China, while 74% of Democrats disapprove; overall, responses were statistically divided with 50% approving and 49% disapproving.
If China does not change the practices that led to the US imposing tariffs on China, 77% of Democrats say the US should not impose additional tariffs, but continue to work through the WTO, while 64% of Republicans prefer imposing additional tariffs without a WTO ruling: overall 55% recommend not imposing tariffs and working through the WTO.

Broadly, Democrats show greater support for international trade than Republicans. "This stands in sharp contrast to Congressional votes on contested trade agreements over the past thirty years," notes Saul I. Stern Professor I.M. "Mac" Destler, one of the primary investigators of the study. "On a range of regional free trade agreements from NAFTA to CAFTA as well country-specific pacts," he notes, "a majority of House Democrats voted 'No,' while preponderant majorities of Republicans were in favor."

The survey was conducted online from Apr. 10 - May 13, 2019 with a national probability-based sample of 2,993 registered voters from Nielsen Scarborough's sample of respondents. The national sample has a margin of error of +/- 1.8% and the half-sample has a margin of error of +/-2.5%.

Report: http://www.publicconsultation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Intl_Trade_Report_0619.pdf
Questionnaire: http://www.publicconsultation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Intl_Trade_Quaire_0619.pdf

Contacts: Steven Kull, [email protected], 202-232-7500
I.M. Destler, [email protected], 202-405-6357

SOURCE Program for Public Consultation