Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG) is a Guernsey closed-ended investment company
traded on NYSE Euronext in Amsterdam under the ticker symbol "TFG."(1) In this report we
provide an update on TFG's results of operations for the period ending 31 March 2013.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
OVERVIEW
TFG achieved strong operating and financial performance in Q1 2013, with a return on
equity ("RoE") above our over-the-cycle target of 10-15% per annum.(2) This strong
performance was driven principally by the company's U.S. Pre-Crisis CLOs, where continued
credit spread tightening, among other factors, contributed to a reduction in applicable
CLO cash flow discount rates. However, as loan spreads have tightened over past months,
this has, via repayments, re- pricings, and other amendment activity, caused CLO
weighted-average spreads to begin to decline, resulting in a reduction in CLO net interest
margins. This effect has begun to reduce the future expected profitability of the
company's current CLOs and if spreads continue to tighten, all else being equal, could
lead to further reductions.
During Q1 2013, TFG made new investments into Polygon hedge funds, CLO equity (LCM
XIII and a third-party transaction) as well as GreenOak-managed real estate vehicles. TFG
also materially reduced its holdings in directly-held bank loans.
TFG's asset management platform ("TFG Asset Management") seeks to allow the company to
achieve fee income on top of its investment income, so as to potentially achieve a higher
blended IRR for each asset class in which TFG invests. Thus, the financial performance of
the asset management business over the long term should be significantly correlated with
TFG's overall investment performance. TFG Asset Management generally performed well and in
accordance with expectations in Q1 2013, with all open funds from LCM Asset Management LLC
("LCM"), GreenOak Real Estate LP ("GreenOak") and Polygon having positive performance and
all three brands increasing their assets under management ("AUM") during the quarter.
As TFG looks for new businesses to expand its asset management platform, the criteria
and objectives remain the same (i.e. to find asset classes where TFG may make good
risk-adjusted investments with sustainable returns, with increased diversification versus
the current portfolio and managed by high-quality investment teams).
GOALS
Looking at the company's goals for 2013 expressed in the recent 2012 Annual Report:
1. To deliver 10-15% RoE per annum to shareholders.(2)
The company exceeded its RoE target of 10-15% during Q1 2013 (on an annualised basis).
For the remainder of the year, however, we may see greater volatility of earnings and
therefore, have more limited visibility as to RoE performance due to, among other factors,
recent credit spread tightening, the uncertainty of loan repayment speeds, reinvestment
opportunities and the de-leveraging paths of CLO transactions past their reinvestment
periods.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
GOALS (continued)
2. To manage more of TFG's assets on the TFG Asset Management platform.
TFG's assets managed on the TFG Asset Management platform grew slightly to 27.5% at
the end of Q1 2013, compared to 27.4% at 31 December 2012.
3. To grow client AUM and fee income.
TFG Asset Management's AUM at 31 March 2013 stood at $8.1 billion, up from $7.7
billion at 2012 year end.(3)
4. To add further asset management businesses to the TFG Asset Management platform.
A number of asset management business opportunities are currently being considered.
DIVIDENDS AND SHARE REPURCHASES
The Q1 2013 dividend was declared at $13.5 cents per share, unchanged from Q4 2012,
resulting in dividend growth of 22.0% on a rolling 12-month basis. During Q1 2013, TFG
resumed its share repurchase program, which will expire on 30 April 2013, and repurchased
approximately 1.02 million shares in the quarter.
OUTLOOK
We remain cautiously optimistic as to the company's performance for the rest of the
year. Some of TFG's CLO investments are nearing the end of, or have exited, their
reinvestment periods and TFG will continue to evaluate its options in respect of such
investments. For example, as typically a majority equity holder in such deals, TFG will
consider, and potentially execute, the exercise of optional calls or other refinancing
activity for such investments over the coming months. We would also like to see at least
one of the new business ventures under current review come to fruition later in the year.
In summary, during the remainder of 2013 we continue to expect to focus on realizing
the benefits of the combination of TFG and the businesses and interests acquired in the
Polygon transaction and continuing to invest for growth over the long-term.
TFG INVESTOR DAY
As part of our ongoing program to enhance communication with current and potential
investors, TFG plans to hold an investor day in London later in 2013. Further details will
follow in due course.
KEY METRICS
We continue to focus on three important metrics when assessing how value is being
created for and delivered to TFG shareholders: Earnings, Net Asset Value ("NAV") per share
and Dividends.
EARNINGS - RETURN ON EQUITY ("RoE")
TFG generated Net Economic Income(4) of $69.3 million in Q1 2013, an increase of 29.8%
versus the same period in 2012.
Q1 2013 RoE(5) of 4.3% (17.1% annualised) reflected another quarter of outperformance
against TFG's over-the-cycle target of 10-15% per annum.(6)
Q1 2013 results were boosted by the sustained re-rating of the CLO portfolio, which
was reflected through a further reduction of the rates used to discount future cash flows
on both U.S. Pre-Crisis CLOs and Euro-denominated deals.
That said, as discussed in TFG's 2012 Annual Report, the cash and income generation
capacity of TFG's U.S. CLO portfolio has continued to decline during Q1 2013 as loan
spreads tightened, reducing the excess interest distributable to equity holders (such as
TFG). All else being equal, we would expect returns on the overall U.S. CLO portfolio to
decline further if the pace and/or extent of loan spread tightening were greater than
projected under the models currently used for determining their fair value. Pre-Crisis
CLOs and early Post-Crisis CLOs which are exiting their reinvestment period may experience
structural de-leveraging more quickly than modeled, which may further reduce future
returns.
Operating expenses of $47.0 million in Q1 2013 were materially higher than the
corresponding period in 2012 primarily due to the acquisition of Polygon's operating
companies and infrastructure in Q4 2012, although the overall TFG Asset Management
business contributed approximately $5.3 million of "EBITDA equivalent"(7) in the quarter.
<pre>
Figure 1
Annual Return on Equity
RoE
2007 11.4%
2008 -3.7%
2009 -27.6%
2010 48.0%
2011 36.0%
2012 24.2%
2013 annualised 17.1%
</pre> EARNINGS PER SHARE ("EPS")
- TFG generated Adjusted EPS(8) of $0.70 during Q1 2013 (Q1 2012: $0.46).
- In Q1 2013, we recalibrated certain of the discount rates used in modeling the fair
value of the CLO portfolio, largely in response to sustained reductions in observed risk
premium data, which added approximately $0.42 of earnings per share after fees (please see
page 24 for further detail).
<pre>
Figure 2
Adjusted EPS Comparison Q1 2011 - Q1 2013
Q1 2011 $1.46
Q1 2012 $0.46
Q1 2013 $0.70
</pre> NAV PER SHARE
Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share(9) ended the quarter at $15.02, up 2.5% since
the end of 2012 and up 14.5% as compared with Q1 2012.
- Total NAV increased year-on-year by 10.4% to $1,666.9 million which equated to Pro
Forma Fully Diluted NAV per share of $15.02.
- The NAV per share improvement in Q1 2013 was primarily driven by the strong
underlying performance of the investment portfolio, in particular the U.S. CLOs, but was
also positively impacted by the company's share repurchase program.
DIVIDENDS
Dividends per Share ("DPS"): TFG declared a Q1 2013 DPS of $0.135, unchanged from Q4
2012. On a rolling 12-month basis, the dividend of $0.50 represents a 22.0% increase over
the previous four quarters.
- TFG continues to pursue a progressive dividend policy with a target payout ratio of
between 30-50% of normalized earnings, recognizing the long-term sustainable target RoE of
10-15% per annum.(10) The Q1 2013 DPS of $0.135 brings the cumulative DPS since TFG's IPO
to $2.395.
<pre>
Figure 4
12-month Rolling DPS Comparison Q1 2011 - Q1 2013 (USD)
Q1 2011 $0.34
Q1 2012 $0.41
Q1 2013 $0.50
</pre> CASH FLOW & USES OF CASH
CASH FLOW AND USES OF CASH
TFG's cash generation remained robust during the first quarter of 2013. During that
period, the CLO portfolio generated $125.6 million in cash flow, compared with $127.6
million in Q4 2012. We describe the CLO portfolio's cash generation in more detail in the
Investment Portfolio section.
During Q1 2013, TFG invested $45.5 million into the equity tranches of new CLO issues,
one managed by LCM and the other by a third-party manager already represented in TFG's CLO
equity portfolio. TFG also invested $40.0 million into various Polygon-managed hedge fund
vehicles, putting the total amount invested in such funds through the end of Q1 2013 at
$95.0 million. Additionally, TFG invested $6.3 million into real estate vehicles managed
by GreenOak during the quarter.
We continued to reduce the size of the direct bank loan portfolio during the quarter,
which resulted in $63.8 million in cash flow from sales of bank loans, net of purchases.
Finally, TFG used approximately $22.3 million in Q1 2013 for net share repurchases at
a discount to NAV and cash dividends.
At the end of Q1 2013, TFG's cash balance was $225.0 million, approximately 13.5% of
net assets.
SHARE REPURCHASES
During Q1 2013, TFG resumed its share repurchase program, which will expire on 30
April 2013, and repurchased approximately 1.02 million shares ($11.4 million) during the
quarter.
Since its launch in 2007 to the end of Q1 2013, TFG's share repurchase program has
resulted in the repurchase of approximately 35.8 million shares at an aggregate cost of
$268.9 million (including the 2012 tender offer).
<pre>
Figure 5
TFG Share Repurchases ($MM)
2010 $25.5
2011 $35.2
2012* $23.6
Q1 2013 $11.4
*2012 figure excludes $150.0 million of shares repurchased in a tender offer
in Q4 2012.
</pre> TFG'S BUSINESS SEGMENTS:
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO AND ASSET MANAGEMENT PLATFORM (TFG ASSET MANAGEMENT)
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
During Q1 2013, we continued to invest in U.S. corporate loans (by investing in the
equity tranches of new issue U.S. CLOs managed by LCM and third-party managers) and real
estate (via GreenOak-managed funds). In addition, we made incremental investments in
Polygon- managed hedge funds.
U.S. corporate loans accessed via CLO equity, which constitute the majority of TFG's
investment assets, continued to perform well during Q1 2013. TFG's real estate, equity and
convertible bond investments also registered positive returns for the quarter and
investment-to-date.
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND OUTLOOK
The following chart shows the composition of net assets by asset class for Q1 2013 and
Q4 2012.
[Figure 6]
TFG's net assets, which totalled $1,666.9 million at the end of Q1 2013, consisted
mainly of:
- corporate loans, both directly owned and indirectly owned through CLO investments;
- equity, credit and convertible bonds owned through Polygon fund investments;
- real estate (owned through GreenOak fund investments or similar arrangements); and
- cash.
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
The following chart summarizes certain performance metrics for each asset class in
TFG's investment portfolio.
Figure 7
<pre>
March 2013
Asset Type NAV (in $MM) LTM Performance (ii) LTD Performance (iii)
U.S. Pre-Crisis CLOs (i) $872.8 39.1% 21.6%
U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs (i) $214.1 10.3% 10.8%
U.S. Direct Loans $51.0 6.5% 7.1%
European CLOs $132.0 31.9% 7.5%
Equities $89.2 4.9%(iv) 23.9%
Convertible Bonds and Credit $10.5 4.5%(iv) 14.3%
Real Estate $29.2 N/A N/A
</pre> (i) "U.S. Pre-Crisis CLO" and "U.S. Post-Crisis CLO" refers to U.S. CLOs issued before
and after 2008, respectively. TFG owns $1.75 million notional in a CLO debt tranche. Such
investment is excluded from these performance metrics.
(ii) For CLOs and direct loans, calculated as the total return. The total return is
calculated as the sum of the aggregate ending period fair values and aggregate cash flows
received during the year, divided by the aggregate beginning period fair values for all
such investments. LTM performance for U.S. Post-Crisis CLO is weighted by the end of Q1
2013 fair values. U.S. Post-Crisis CLO equity investments which were made during the year,
and which therefore lack a full year of performance, are annualised. The LTM performance
for European CLOs excludes the impact of any changes in the EUR-USD exchange rate on TFG's
fair values and cash flows received for such investments.
(iii) For CLOs, the LTD performance metric used is the IRR, weighted by the amortised
costs brought-forward of each investment. IRRs are calculated taking into account
historical cost, cash flows received, and future projected cash flows. For direct loans,
the LTD performance metric used is the annualised total rate of return. For
Polygon-managed funds (equities, credit, and convertible bonds), the LTD performance
metric shown is the IRR (calculated using the XIRR function in Excel), reflecting the
timing of all investments made through the end of Q1 2013 and the fair value of the funds
as of 31 March 2013.
(iv) Note that for Polygon-managed funds (equities, credit, and convertible bonds),
LTM returns are presented as the actual return for TFG's period of investment from 1
December to 31 March 2013. TFG invests in Polygon-managed funds on a preferred fee-basis.
CORPORATE LOANS
TFG's exposure to the corporate loan asset class (whether held directly or indirectly
via CLO equity investments) totalled $1,269.9 million at the end of Q1 2013 ($1,328.5
million at the end of 2012) and remained diversified, with 76.5% in U.S.
broadly-syndicated senior secured loans, 13.1% in U.S. middle-market senior secured loans
and 10.4% in European senior secured loans.(11)
TFG's CLO equity investments, which comprise the majority of its exposure to corporate
loan assets, represented indirect exposure to approximately $18.1 billion par value of
leveraged loans. TFG's total notional amount invested in the equity tranches of such deals
was approximately $1.8 billion. We view the difference between the par value of indirect
loan exposures and TFG's notional amount of equity as an approximation of TFG's portion of
the non-recourse debt "borrowed" via CLOs to fund the purchase of such loan assets. At the
end of Q1 2013, this difference was $16.3 billion.
When reporting on our corporate loan exposures, we find it useful to further segment
such investments into the following classes:
- U.S. Pre-Crisis CLOs
- U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs
- European CLOs
- Direct U.S. Loans
U.S. PRE-CRISIS CLOs
As of the end of Q1 2013, TFG held equity investments in 53 U.S. Pre-Crisis CLOs and
one investment in the debt tranche of a U.S. Pre-Crisis U.S. CLO.(12) The U.S. Pre-Crisis
CLO equity investments had total fair value of $872.8 million as of 31 March 2013,
compared with $914.8 million at the end of the prior quarter.
TFG's investments in U.S. Pre-Crisis CLO equity continued to perform well during Q1
2013, with all deals passing their junior-most O/C tests, benefitting from a benign credit
environment and active reinvestment periods for a significant share of this part of the
portfolio.(13) During this quarter, however, we also began to see the effects of U.S. loan
spread tightening filter through the U.S. CLO portfolio, as weighted-average spreads of
TFG's U.S. Pre-Crisis CLOs declined quarter-on-quarter. Given the relatively rapid pace of
loan spread tightening experienced during the quarter and the delay with which it
typically impacts CLO interest collections, cash flows generated by TFG's U.S. Pre-Crisis
CLOs remained robust. We anticipate, however, that the impact of loan spread tightening
executed to date may be more fully reflected in TFG's U.S. Pre- Crisis CLOs' equity
distributions in the coming months, as effective excess interest levels decline.
During Q1 2013, TFG's U.S. Pre-Crisis CLO investments produced cash flows of $110.0
million ($1.12 per average outstanding share), compared with $112.3 million ($1.03 per
average outstanding share) generated during Q4 2012.(14) We anticipate, however, that
continued loan spread and LIBOR floor compression may reduce the excess interest available
for distribution to the equity tranches within TFG's CLO portfolio; although its ultimate
impact will vary across transactions depending on their vintage, portfolio composition,
and reinvestment flexibility, among other factors. Additionally, as noted previously, the
majority of these deals will exit their reinvestment periods and begin amortizing in
2013-2014, and as such, their leverage and cash flow generation capacity will begin to
decline. Furthermore, rising LIBOR rates may similarly reduce excess interest availability
by decreasing the benefit of existing loan LIBOR floors.
U.S. POST-CRISIS CLOs
As of the end of Q1 2013, TFG held 10 equity investments in U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs with
a total fair value of $214.1 million as of 31 March 2013, up from $174.0 million as of the
end of Q4 2012. During the quarter, we made investments in the equity tranches of two new
issue U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs, totalling $45.5 million at cost, including one deal managed
by LCM. All such investments were majority equity stakes.
TFG's U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs performed well during the quarter with none of the
investments experiencing an underlying asset default and all O/C tests remaining in
compliance within each deal.(15) During Q1 2013, TFG's U.S. Post-Crisis CLO investments
produced cash flows of $8.9 million ($0.09 per average outstanding share), as compared
with $8.3 million ($0.08 per average outstanding share) in the prior quarter.(16)
TFG's U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs were subject to the same market forces as our Pre-Crisis
CLOs, facing increasingly challenging reinvestment conditions characterized by rising loan
prices and declining LIBOR floor levels, albeit in the context of a benign loan default
environment. Given the portfolio composition of U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs (with significant
concentrations in 2011-2012 vintage loans which were the main vintage of loans re-priced
to date), higher funding costs and longer remaining reinvestment periods, these
transactions are expected to be more negatively impacted by loan spread tightening than
earlier vintages.
On the positive side, rising underlying loan prices would be expected to increase the
value of the equity call option as well as the likelihood that the CLOs' liabilities may
be refinanced at lower levels. We expect to explore such opportunities in the coming
months with the goal of ensuring that the "arbitrage-funding gap" of our CLO investments
remains attractive on a relative, risk- adjusted basis.
EUROPEAN CLOs
As of the end of Q1 2013, TFG held equity investments in 10 European CLOs with a total
fair value of $132.0 million as of 31 March 2013, up from $125.6 million as of the end of
Q4 2012.
The performance of TFG's European CLO equity investments in Q1 2013 has improved
marginally, although we continue to expect that it may remain volatile. During Q1 2013,
TFG's European CLO investments generated cash flow of EUR5.0 million or (EUR0.05 per
average outstanding share), compared with EUR5.4 million (EUR0.05 per average outstanding
share) in the prior quarter.(17) As of the end of Q1 2013, 80.0% of all of TFG's European
CLO investments were passing their junior-most O/C tests, weighted by fair value, and
70.0% were passing when weighted by number of deals.(18)
The following graph shows the evolution of TFG's CLO equity investment IRRs over the
past three years.
[Figure 8]
DIRECT LOANS
As of the end of Q1 2013, TFG held U.S. direct loan investments with a total fair
value of $51.0 million and par value of $50.5 million. As noted in the 2012 annual report,
we significantly reduced our exposure to direct loans during the first quarter, reflecting
our view that the pace of spread compression had rendered owning bank loans outright less
attractive from a risk-reward perspective.
The direct bank loan portfolio performed well during Q1 2013, experiencing no defaults
or credit downgrades. In line with broader market conditions, the portfolio witnessed
notable spread tightening and a pick-up in refinancing activity and repayments.
EQUITIES
As of the end of Q1 2013, TFG held $89.2 million of investments (at fair value) in
Polygon- managed equity funds, including $40.0 million of new capital investments during
Q1 2013, up from $46.4 million as of the end of Q4 2012. Currently, these fund strategies
are primarily focused on European event-driven equity, global equities and mining
equities-related investments. Fund investments were made on 1 December 2012, and through
the end of Q1 2013 these fund investments had returned 4.9% to TFG. The blended,
weighted-average IRR generated by the equities funds from the date of each investment
through the end of Q1 2013 totalled approximately 23.9%.(19)
CONVERTIBLE BONDS
As of the end of Q1 2013, TFG held $10.5 million of investments (at fair value) in a
Polygon- managed convertibles fund, up from $10.1 million at the end of Q4 2012. The fund
investment was made on 1 December 2012 and through the end of Q1 2013 year had returned
4.5% to TFG. The blended, weighted-average IRR generated by the convertibles fund from the
date of each investment through the end of Q1 2013 totalled approximately 14.3%.(20)
REAL ESTATE
As of the end of Q1 2013, TFG held $29.2 million of investments (at fair value) in
GreenOak- managed real estate funds and vehicles, including $6.3 million of new capital
investments funded during Q1 2013, up from $25.7 million as of the end of 2012. Such
investments include numerous commercial and residential properties across Japan, the
United States and Europe.
During the first quarter of the year, TFG received distributions of over $4.5 million,
bringing life-to- date receipts from its real estate investments to approximately $7.0
million. A significant portion of this quarter's distributions came from two asset sales
within two of the real estate funds in which TFG is invested. Realised equity multiples on
these sales (before fund fees, expenses, and relevant taxes) were 1.6x and 1.9x, which
meaningfully exceeded our original expectations.
The company will continue to fund capital commitments into GreenOak projects in 2013.
TFG ASSET MANAGEMENT
UPDATE ON KEY METRICS
TFG Asset Management currently has three primary asset management brands: LCM,
GreenOak and Polygon. We believe that the key metrics to measure the performance of the
asset management platform are the following:
- Performance of the underlying funds: Performance of the various funds managed by TFG
asset management's brands (currently Polygon, LCM and GreenOak) was strong during Q1
2013.
- Gross revenues: composed primarily of management and performance fees from clients,
totalled $11.6 million in Q1 2013.
- "EBITDA equivalent": totalled $5.3 million in Q1 2013 (as shown below).
<pre>
Figure 9
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
TFG Asset Management Statement of Operations Q1 2013
U.S. GAAP Net Economic income
$MM $MM
Fee income(21) 11.6 11.6
Unrealised Polygon performance fees(22) 0.0 0.9
Interest income 0.1 0.1
Total income 11.7 12.6
Operating, employee and administrative expenses(21) (7.3) (7.3)
Net income - "EBITDA equivalent" 4.4 5.3
Performance fee allocation to TFM (0.3) (0.5)
Amortisation expense on management contracts (1.7) (1.7)
Net income before taxes 2.4 3.1
Income taxes (1.4) (1.7)
Net income 1.0 1.5
</pre> ASSET MANAGEMENT BRANDS
AUM for the three key asset management brands (LCM, GreenOak Real Estate and Polygon)
are shown below at 31 March 2013.
<pre>
Figure 10
Summary of Asset Management AUM ($BN)
Brand 31 March 2013 31 December 2012
LCM $4.5 $4.3
GreenOak (i) $2.4 $2.3
Polygon (ii) $1.2 $1.1
Total $8.1 $7.7
</pre> (i) Includes funds and advisory assets.
(ii) AUM for Polygon Recovery Fund LP, Polygon Convertible Opportunity Master Fund,
Polygon European Equity Opportunity Master Fund and associated managed account, Polygon
Mining Opportunity Master Fund and Polygon Global Equity Master Fund, as calculated by
applicable administrator. Includes, where relevant, investments by Tetragon Financial
Group Master Fund Limited.
LCM
LCM is a specialist in below- investment grade U.S. broadly-syndicated leveraged loans
that was established in 2001. Farboud Tavangar is senior portfolio manager.
LCM continued to perform well during Q1 2013, with all of LCM Cash Flow CLOs(23) that
were still within their reinvestment periods continuing to pay senior and subordinated
management fees.
At 31 March 2013, LCM's total CLO loan assets under management stood at approximately
$4.5 billion. LCM XIII, a $519 million CLO, priced on 25 January 2013 and closed on 26
February 2013, bringing the total number of CLOs currently under management to twelve.
[Figure 11]
GREENOAK
GreenOak is a real estate-focused principal investing and advisory firm established in
2010. The Principals and Founders are John Carrafiell, Sonny Kalsi and Fred Schmidt.
During Q1 2013, GreenOak continued to execute on its strategy with respect to its
funds and its advisory assignments on behalf of select strategic clients with mandates in
Europe, Japan and the United States. At 31 March 2013, assets under management totalled
approximately $2.4 billion.
[Figure 12]
POLYGON FUNDS
Total AUM for the Polygon funds was approximately $1.2 billion at 31 March 2013.
<pre>
Figure 13
Summary of Polygon Funds Assets Under Management ($MM)
Annualized
Fund 31 March 2013 2013 Net Performance LTD Performance
European Event-Driven Equity (i) $246 4.4% 14.1%
Convertibles (ii) $298 2.7% 23.2%
Mining Equities (iii) $46 2.2% 5.7%
Private Equity Vehicle (iv) $558 -0.3% 7.7%
Other Equity (v) $16 5.8% 11.0%
Polygon Funds Total AUM $1,164
</pre> (i) The fund began trading 8 July 2009 with Class B shares which carry no incentive
fee. Class A shares commenced trading on 1 December 2009.
Returns from inception through November 2009 for Class A shares have been pro forma
adjusted to match the Fund's Class A share terms as set forth in the Offering Memorandum
(1.5% management fee, 20% incentive fee and other items, in each case, as set forth in the
offering Memorandum). From December 2009 to February 2011, the table reflects actual Class
A share performance on the terms set forth in the Offering Memorandum. From March 2011,
forward, the table reflects actual Class A1 share performance on the terms set forth in
the Offering Memorandum. Class A1 share performance is equivalent to Class A share
performance for prior periods.
(ii) The fund began trading with Class B shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 20
May 2009. Class A shares of the Fund were first issued on 1 April 2010 and returns from
inception through March 2010, have been pro forma adjusted to match the Fund's Class A
share terms as set forth in the Offering Memorandum (1.5% management fee, 20% incentive
fee over a hurdle and other items, in each case, as set forth in the Offering Memorandum).
(iii) The fund began trading with Class B1 shares, which carry no incentive fees, on 1
June 2012. Returns shown here have been pro forma adjusted to account for a 2.0%
management fee, a 20% incentive fee, and non trading expenses capped at 1%, in each case,
as set forth in the Offering Memorandum.
(iv) Inception 8 March 2011. Individual investor performance will vary based on their
high water mark. Currently the majority of Class C share class investors have not reached
their high water mark, so their performance is the same as their gross performance.
(v) The fund began trading with Class B/B1 shares, which carry no incentive fees, on
12 September 2011. Returns shown here have been pro forma adjusted to account for a 2.0%
management fee and a 20% incentive fee, in each case, as to be set forth in further
definitive documents.
(vi) The AUM noted above includes investments in the relevant strategies by TFG, other
than in respect of the Private Equity Vehicle, where there is no such investment. The
Private Equity vehicle, at the time of the Polygon transaction and currently, remains a
closed investment strategy.
[Figure 14]
FINANCIAL TABLES
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
<pre>
Figure 15
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Quarterly Financial Highlights
Q1 2013 Q1 2012 Q1 2011
U.S. GAAP net income ($MM) $63.0 $53.4 $174.7
Net economic income ($MM) $69.3 $53.4 $174.7
U.S. GAAP EPS $0.64 $0.46 $1.46
Adjusted EPS $0.70 $0.46 $1.46
Return on equity 4.3% 3.6% 15.4%
Net assets ($MM) $1,666.9 $1,510.1 $1,298.0
U.S. GAAP number of shares outstanding (MM) 97.9 115.1 119.6
U.S. GAAP NAV per share $17.03 $13.12 $10.85
Pro Forma number of shares outstanding (MM) 110.9 115.1 119.6
Pro Forma fully diluted NAV per share $15.02 13.12 10.85
DPS $0.135 $0.105 $0.090
</pre> In this section, we present consolidated financial data incorporating TFG and its 100%
subsidiary, Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited.
We believe the following metrics may be helpful in understanding the progress and
performance of the company:
- Return on Equity (4.3%): Net Economic Income ($69.3 million) divided by Net Assets
at the start of the year ($1,621.4 million).
- Net Economic Income (+$69.3 million): adds back to the U.S. GAAP net income (+$63.0
million) the imputed Q1 2013 share based employee compensation (+$5.8 million), which is
generated on an ongoing basis resulting from the Polygon transaction and also includes
unrealised Polygon performance fees(24) (+$0.5 million).
- Pro Forma Fully Diluted Shares (110.9 million): adjusts the U.S. GAAP shares
outstanding (97.9 million) for the impact of escrow shares used as consideration in the
Polygon transaction and associated stock dividends (+12.0 million) and for the potential
impact of options issued to TFG's investment manager at the time of TFG's IPO (+1.1
million).
- Adjusted EPS ($0.70): calculated as Net Economic Income ($69.3 million) divided by
weighted-average U.S. GAAP shares outstanding (98.4 million).
- Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share ($15.02): calculated as Net Assets ($1,666.9
million) divided by Pro Forma Fully Diluted shares (110.9 million).(25)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
<pre>
Figure 16
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Statement of Operations - Quarterly Comparison
Statement of Operations Q1 2013 ($MM) Q1 2012 ($MM) Q1 2011 ($MM)
Interest income 56.6 57.5 48.5
Fee income 11.6 5.7 5.2
Other income 5.8 0.0 0.0
Investment income 74.0 63.2 53.7
Management and performance fees (24.8) (19.5) (60.0)
Other operating and administrative expenses (22.2) (4.8) (5.6)
Total operating expenses (47.0) (24.3) (65.6)
Net investment income 27.0 38.9 (11.8)
Net change in unrealised appreciation in
investments 32.7 16.2 184.5
Realised gain on investments 3.0 0.1 0.6
Realised and unrealised gain/(loss) from
hedging and fx 1.7 (0.7) 2.8
Net realised and unrealised gains from
investments and fx 37.4 15.6 188.0
Income taxes (1.4) (0.6) (1.0)
Noncontrolling interest 0.0 (0.5) (0.5)
U.S. GAAP net income 63.0 53.4 174.7
Add back share based employee compensation 5.8 0.0 0.0
Net unrealised Polygon performance fees 0.5 0.0 0.0
Net Economic Income 69.3 53.4 174.7
</pre> Performance Fee
A performance fee of $18.7 million was accrued in Q1 2013 in accordance with TFG's
investment management agreement and based on a "Reference NAV" of Q4 2012. The hurdle rate
for the Q2 2013 incentive fee has been reset at 2.929958% (Q1 2013: 2.952858%) as per the
process outlined in TFG's 2012 audited financial statements and in accordance with TFG's
investment management agreement.
Please see TFG's website, http://www.tetragoninv.com, [http://www.tetragoninv.com ]
and the 2012 TFG audited financial statements for more details on the calculation of this
fee.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS BY SEGMENT
<pre>
Figure 17
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Statement of Operations by Segment Q1 2013
Investment
Portfolio $MM TFG AM $MM Total $MM
Interest income 56.5 0.1 56.6
Fee income - 11.6 11.6
Other income - 5.8 5.8
Investment and management fee income 56.5 17.5 74.0
Management and performance fees (24.5) (0.3) (24.8)
Other operating and administrative expenses (1.6) (14.8) (16.4)
Share based employee compensation - - (5.8)
Total operating expenses (26.1) (15.1) (47.0)
Net investment income 30.4 2.4 27.0
Net change in unrealised appreciation in investments 32.7 - 32.7
Realised gain on investments 3.0 - 3.0
Realised and unrealised gains from hedging and fx 1.7 - 1.7
Net realised and unrealised gains from
investments and fx 37.4 - 37.4
Income taxes - (1.4) (1.4)
U.S. GAAP net income 67.8 1.0 63.0
Share based employee compensation - - 5.8
Net unrealised Polygon performance fees - 0.5 0.5
Net economic income 67.8 1.5 69.3
</pre> BALANCE SHEET
<pre>
Figure 18
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2013 and 31 December 2012
Mar-13 Dec-12
$MM $MM
Assets
Investments, at fair value 1,429.2 1,440.4
Management contracts 41.7 43.4
Cash and cash equivalents 225.0 175.9
Amounts due from brokers 3.7 13.1
Derivative financial assets - interest rate swaptions 9.0 7.6
Derivative financial assets - forward contracts 2.9 0.0
Other receivables 17.0 15.8
Total assets 1,728.5 1,696.2
Liabilities
Operating expenses and accrued fees payable 48.5 61.7
Amounts payable on treasury shares 1.1 0.0
Amounts payable on share options 9.1 6.6
Income and deferred tax payable 2.9 4.3
Derivative financial liabilities - forward contracts 0.0 2.2
Total liabilities 61.6 74.8
Net assets 1,666.9 1,621.4
</pre> STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<pre>
Figure 19
TETRAGON FINANCIAL GROUP
Statement of Cash Flows
Q1 2013 Q1 2012 Q1 2011
$MM $MM $MM
Operating activities
Operating cash flows after incentive fees and
before movements in working
capital 89.6 83.2 51.5
Change in payables/receivables (3.3) (2.5) 0.7
Cash flows from operating activities 86.3 80.7 52.2
Investment activities
Proceeds on sales of investments
- Proceeds sale of bank loans 52.2 0.0 17.5
- Maturity and prepayment of bank loans 17.3 14.8 16.2
- Proceeds sale of real estate investments 4.5 0.0 0.0
- Proceeds sale of CLOs 0.0 0.2 0.0
Purchase of investments
- Purchase of CLO equity (45.5) (42.3) (14.0)
- Purchase of bank loans (5.7) (17.5) (39.5)
- Purchase of CLO mezz 0.0 (1.1) 0.0
- Purchase of real estate investments (6.3) (5.1) 0.0
- Investments in asset managers (0.5) (2.4) 0.0
- Investments in hedge funds (40.0) 0.0 0.0
Cash flows from operating and investing activities 62.3 27.3 32.4
Amounts due from broker 9.4 3.3 (11.8)
Net purchase of shares (9.0) (5.5) (4.8)
Dividends paid to shareholders (13.3) (12.1) (9.4)
Cash flows from financing activities (12.9) (14.3) (26.0)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 49.4 13.0 6.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 175.9 211.5 140.6
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash
and cash equivalents (0.3) 0.3 0.0
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 225.0 224.8 147.0
</pre> U.S. GAAP TO FULLY DILUTED SHARES RECONCILATION
<pre>
Figure 20
U.S. GAAP to Fully Diluted 31 Mar 2013
Shares Reconciliation Shares (MM)
Legal Shares Issued and Outstanding 134.01
Less: Shares Held In Subsidiary 16.60
Less: Shares Held In Treasury 7.53
Less: Escrow Shares 11.98
U.S. GAAP Shares Outstanding 97.90
Add: Manager (IPO) Share Options(25.ii) 1.07
Add: Escrow Shares 11.98
Pro Forma Fully Diluted Shares 110.95
</pre> APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
CERTAIN REGULATORY INFORMATION
This Performance Report constitutes TFG's interim management statement as required
pursuant to Section 5:25e of the Netherlands Financial Markets Supervision Act (Wet op het
financieel toezicht, "FMSA"). Pursuant to Section 5:25e and 5:25m of the FMSA, this report
is made public by means of a press release and has been filed with the Netherlands
Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiele Marketen) and also made
available to the public by way of publication on the TFG website (
http://www.tetragoninv.com).
An investment in TFG involves substantial risks. Please refer to the Company's website
at http://www.tetragoninv.com for a description of the risks and uncertainties
pertaining to an investment in TFG.
This release does not contain or constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an
offer to purchase securities in the United States or any other jurisdiction. The
securities of TFG have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act
of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United
States or to U.S. persons unless they are registered under applicable law or exempt from
registration. TFG does not intend to register any portion of its securities in the United
States or to conduct a public offer of securities in the United States. In addition, TFG
has not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, and
investors will not be entitled to the benefits of such Act. TFG is registered in the
public register of the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets under Section 1:107
of the Financial Markets Supervision Act ("FMSA") as a collective investment scheme from a
designated country. This release constitutes regulated information ("gereglementeerde
informative") within the meaning of Section 1:1 of the FMSA.
APPENDIX II
FAIR VALUE DETERMINATION OF TFG'S CLO EQUITY INVESTMENTS
In accordance with the valuation policies set forth on the company's website, the
values of TFG's CLO equity investments are determined using a third-party cash flow
modeling tool. The model contains certain assumption inputs that are reviewed and adjusted
as appropriate to factor in how historic, current and potential market developments
(examined through, for example, forward- looking observable data) might potentially impact
the performance of TFG's CLO equity investments. Since this involves modeling, among other
things, forward projections over multiple years, this is not an exercise in recalibrating
future assumptions to the latest quarter's historical data.
Subject to the foregoing, when determining the U.S. GAAP-compliant fair value of TFG's
portfolio, the company seeks to derive a value at which market participants could transact
in an orderly market and also seeks to benchmark the model inputs and resulting outputs to
observable market data when available and appropriate.
Forward-looking CLO Equity Cash Flow Modeling Assumptions Unchanged in Q1 2013:
The Investment Manager reviews and, when appropriate, adjusts in consultation with
TFG's audit committee, the CLO equity investment portfolio's modeling assumptions as
described above. At the end of Q1 2013, key assumptions relating to defaults, recoveries,
prepayments and reinvestment prices were unchanged from the previous quarter. This was the
case across both U.S. and European deals.
<pre>
Figure 21
U.S. Deals
Variable Year Current Assumptions
CADR
2013-2014 1.0x WARF-implied default rate (2.2%)
2015-2017 1.25x WARF-implied default rate (2.7%)
Thereafter 1.0x WARF-implied default rate (2.2%)
Recovery Rate
Until deal maturity 73%
Prepayment Rate
Until deal maturity 20.0% p.a. on loans; 0.0% on bonds
Reinvestment Price
Until deal maturity 100%
</pre><pre>
Figure 22
European Deals
Variable Year Current Assumptions
CADR
2013-2014 1.5x WARF-implied default rate (3.1%)
2015-2017 1.25x WARF-implied default rate (2.6%)
Thereafter 1.0x WARF-implied default rate (2.1%)
Recovery Rate
Until deal maturity 68%
Prepayment Rate
Until deal maturity 20.0% p.a. on loans; 0.0% on bonds
Reinvestment Price
Until deal maturity 100%
</pre> These key average assumption variables include the modeling assumptions disclosed as a
weighted-average (by U.S. dollar amount) of the individual deal assumptions, aggregated by
geography (i.e. U.S. and European). Such weighted-averages may change from month to month
due to movements in the amortised costs of the deals, even without changes to the
underlying assumptions. Each individual deal's assumptions may differ from this
geographical average and vary across the portfolio.
The reinvestment price, assumptions about reinvestment spread and reinvestment life
are also input into the model to generate an effective spread over LIBOR. Newer vintage
CLOs may have a higher weighted-average reinvestment spread over LIBOR or shorter
reinvestment life assumptions than older deals. Across the entire CLO portfolio, the
reinvestment price assumption of 100% for U.S. deals and European deals with their
respective assumed weighted-average reinvestment spreads, generates an effective spread
over LIBOR of approximately 288 bps on broadly syndicated U.S. loans, 272 bps on European
loans, and 328 bps on middle market loans.
Application of Discount Rate to Projected CLO Equity Cash Flows: 2005 - 2007 Vintage
Deals - Discount Rates Recalibrated
In determining the applicable rates to use to discount projected cash flows, an
analysis of observable risk premium data is undertaken. Observable risk premia such as BB
and BBB CLO tranche spreads decreased in Q4 2012 and ended Q1 2013 at an even lower level.
For example, according to Citibank research, BB spreads, which were 10.8% at the end of Q2
2012, fell to
6.3% by the end of Q1 2013.(26) As a result of the observed continued tightening of
these spreads and overall reduction in risk premia, the discount rates for the U.S. deals
have been reduced to
15.0% for strong deals and to 20.0% for other deals.
Per Citibank research, European originally BB-rated tranche yields have followed a
similar trajectory to U.S. spreads over the last three quarters, declining from 22% at the
end of Q2 2012 to 12% at the end of Q1 2013.(27) As a result of this reduction in risk
premia, the discount rates for European deals have been reduced to 25.0%, which is still
significantly above U.S. deal discount rates, reflecting, in part, the ongoing uncertainty
surrounding Europe.
Historically we have characterized the difference between fair value and the amortised
cost for the portfolio as the "ALR Fair Value Adjustment" or "ALR". For European deals, at
the end of Q1 the ALR stands at $71.1 million compared to $86.6 million at the end of Q4.
As explained in the
2012 Annual Report this is no longer applicable for U.S. deals.
U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs - Discount Rates Remain at Deal IRRs
The applicable discount rate for U.S. Post-Crisis CLOs is determined with reference to
each deal's specific IRR, which, in the absence of other observable data points, is deemed
to be the most appropriate indication of the current risk premium on these structures. At
the end of Q1
2013, the weighted-average discount rate (and IRR) on these deals was 10.8%. Such
deals represented approximately 17.6% of the CLO equity portfolio by fair value (up from
14.3% at the end of Q4 2012). We will continue to monitor observable data on these newer
vintage transactions to determine whether the IRR remains the appropriate discount rate.
Effect on Fair Value and Net Income of Recalibration of Certain Discount Rates
Overall, the net impact of the recalibration of certain discount rates described above
led to an overall increase in fair value of the total CLO equity portfolio of
approximately $54.6 million, or
$41.0 million in bottom line net income.
APPENDIX III
CLO MARKET COMMENTARY
- U.S. leveraged loan defaults pick up but remain below historical average: The U.S.
lagged 12-month loan default rate rose to 2.21% by principal amount at the end of Q1 2013,
up from 1.27% at the end of Q4 2012.(28) Despite the spike, the trailing 12-month U.S.
loan default rate remains below the 3.3% historical average.(29) TFG's lagging 12-month
loan default rate declined to 1.1% at the end of Q1 2013, down from 1.4% at the end of
2012.(30) The graph below shows three-year history for both TFG and the U.S. market-wide
loan default rates.
[Figure 23]
- U.S. primary loan issuance volumes rise vs. previous quarter: Institutional U.S.
loan issuance volumes reached a record high of approximately $150.0 billion during Q1
2013, up from $90.3 billion in Q4 2012, driven by an increase in refinancing activity and
strong demand from resurgent CLO issuance and mutual fund inflows.(31) European
institutional loan volumes rose to EUR7.4 billion in Q1 2013, up from EUR4.5 billion in Q4
2012.(32)
- U.S. loan refinancing activity accelerates as loan spreads decline: U.S. loan
issuers took advantage of substantial capital inflows to refinance an unprecedented volume
of existing facilities. During Q1 2013, institutional refinancing volume reached a record
$126.7 billion as compared with a $72.3 billion full-year total in 2012.(33) On a
pro-forma basis, issuers reduced the spread of 23.0% of S&P/LSTA Index loans by 108 bps,
on average, translating to an approximate 25 bps decline in the weighted-average all-in
spread of the S&P/LSTA Index.(34)
- U.S. and European loan price gains continue: U.S. secondary loan prices rose during
Q1
2013, as the U.S. S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index returned 2.11%, up from 1.42% during
Q4 2012, with lower-rated credits registering the biggest gains.(35) Similarly, the S&P
European Leveraged Loan Index ("ELLI") returned 2.05% during Q1 2013 (excluding currency
effects).(36)
- U.S. repayments remain robust but decline in Europe: The U.S. S&P/LSTA Leveraged
Loan Index repayment rate rose to 17.5% during Q1 2013, up from 15.2% in Q4 2012.(37)
Repayments within the S&P European Leveraged Loan Index ("ELLI"), on the other hand,
declined to EUR4.6 billion or 4.3% during Q1 2013, down from 4.9% in the prior
quarter.(38)
- "Maturity wall" erosion continues: At the end of Q1 2013, the amount of S&P/LSTA
Index loans maturing in 2013/2014 declined to $29.8 billion from $47.6 billion at the end
of Q4
2012, representing 9.0% of all outstanding performing loans.(39) This relatively low
level of near-term maturities is viewed as a key factor underpinning market participants'
low near- term default expectations.
- U.S. and European CLO junior O/C ratios improve: In Q1 2013, average O/C ratios of
U.S. and European CLOs improved as compared with the end of Q4 2012. According to Morgan
Stanley, the median junior O/C test cushion for U.S. CLOs rose to 4.74% at the end of Q1
2013(40) up from 4.63% as of the end of 2012.(41) Similarly, the median junior O/C test
cushion for Euro CLOs rose to 0.63% at the end of Q1 2013(42) vs. 0.26% at the end of
2012.(43)
- U.S. and European CLO debt spreads tighten versus year-end: Average secondary U.S.
and European CLO debt spreads tightened across the capital structure at the end of Q1
2013 vs. Q4 2012, with mezzanine tranches registering the greatest declines.(44)
- U.S. new issue arbitrage CLO volume reaches new highs: During Q1 2013, 52 U.S.
arbitrage cash flow CLOs were priced totalling $26.3 billion in volume, representing the
second-highest quarterly volume on record.(45) While the forward pipeline of new issue
arbitrage CLOs appears quite robust, continued U.S. loan spread tightening, rising loan
prices, regulatory headwinds and "stickiness" of senior CLO debt pricing may reduce the
attractiveness of CLO equity arbitrage levels and therefore lead to a deceleration of the
pace of CLO issuance as compared with Q1 2013.
APPENDIX IV
ADDITIONAL CLO PORTFOLIO STATISTICS
- CLO Portfolio Credit Quality: The weighted-average WARF across all of TFG's CLO
equity investments stood at approximately 2,541 as of the end of Q1 2013. Each of these
foregoing statistics represents a weighted-average summary (weighted by initial cost) of
all of our deals. Each individual deal's metrics will differ from these averages and vary
across the portfolio.
Figure 24
<pre>
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2
ALL CLOs 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2011 2011 2011 2011 2010 2010 2010
Caa1/CCC+
or
Below
Obligors: 5.1% 6.0% 6.4% 5.7% 6.2% 7.0% 7.0% 7.2% 7.6% 8.3% 9.6% 10.5%
WARF: 2,541 2,599 2,605 2,578 2,588 2,624 2,614 2,642 2,664 2,671 2,658 2,706
</pre><pre>
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2
U.S. CLOs 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2011 2011 2011 2011 2010 2010 2010
Caa1/CCC+
or
Below
Obligors: 4.0% 4.5% 4.9% 4.2% 4.8% 5.5% 5.5% 5.8% 6.5% 6.9% 7.9% 8.4%
WARF: 2,510 2,524 2,528 2,491 2,504 2,533 2,522 2,542 2,591 2,622 2,610 2,648
</pre><pre>
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2
EUR CLOs 2013 2012 2012 2012 2012 2011 2011 2011 2011 2010 2010 2010
Caa1/CCC+
or
Below
Obligors: 9.7% 11.7% 12.2% 11.6% 11.1% 12.3% 12.0% 12.3% 11.4% 13.1% 15.3% 17.4%
WARF: 2,670 2,896 2,903 2,910 2,900 2,948 2,941 2,997 2,914 2,837 2,817 2,898
</pre> CLO EQUITY PORTFOLIO DETAILS AS OF 31 MARCH 2013
<pre>
Figure 25
Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG)
CLO Portfolio Details
As of March 31, 2013
Original
Cost of
Original Deal End of Wtd Avg Funds
Invest. Cost Closing Year of Reinv Spread (bps)
Transaction(i) Deal Type ($MM USD)(ii) Date Maturity Period (bps)(iii)(iv)
Transaction 1 EUR CLO 37.5 2007 2024 2014 356 55
Transaction 2 EUR CLO 29.7 2006 2023 2013 396 52
Transaction 3 EUR CLO 22.2 2006 2022 2012 394 58
Transaction 4 EUR CLO 33.0 2007 2023 2013 414 48
Transaction 5 EUR CLO 36.9 2007 2022 2014 403 60
Transaction 6 EUR CLO 33.3 2006 2022 2012 362 51
Transaction 7 EUR CLO 38.5 2007 2023 2013 388 46
Transaction 8 EUR CLO 26.9 2005 2021 2011 373 53
Transaction 9 EUR CLO 41.3 2007 2023 2013 413 50
Transaction 10 EUR CLO 27.0 2006 2022 2012 373 50
EUR CLO Subtotal: 326.3 388 52
Transaction 11 US CLO 20.5 2006 2018 2012 341 45
Transaction 12 US CLO 22.8 2006 2019 2013 359 46
Transaction 13 US CLO 15.2 2006 2018 2012 379 47
Transaction 14 US CLO 26.0 2007 2021 2014 388 49
Transaction 15 US CLO 28.1 2007 2021 2014 456 52
Transaction 16 US CLO 23.5 2006 2020 2013 426 46
Transaction 17 US CLO 26.0 2007 2021 2014 352 40
Transaction 18 US CLO 16.7 2005 2017 2011 330 45
Transaction 19 US CLO 1.2 2005 2017 2011 330 45
Transaction 20 US CLO 26.6 2006 2020 2012 457 52
Transaction 21 US CLO 20.7 2006 2020 2012 451 53
Transaction 22 US CLO 37.4 2007 2021 2014 453 53
Transaction 23 US CLO 19.9 2007 2021 2013 345 66
Transaction 24 US CLO 16.9 2006 2018 2012 426 46
Transaction 25 US CLO 20.9 2006 2018 2013 428 46
Transaction 26 US CLO 27.9 2007 2019 2013 440 43
Transaction 27 US CLO 23.9 2007 2021 2014 563 51
Transaction 28 US CLO 7.6 2007 2021 2014 563 51
Transaction 29 US CLO 19.1 2005 2018 2011 445 66
Transaction 30 US CLO 12.4 2006 2018 2012 468 67
Transaction 31 US CLO 9.5 2005 2017 2012 331 52
Transaction 32 US CLO 24.0 2007 2021 2014 349 59
Transaction 33 US CLO 16.2 2006 2020 2012 367 56
Transaction 34 US CLO 22.2 2006 2020 2012 374 50
Transaction 35 US CLO 23.6 2006 2018 2012 435 52
Transaction 36 US CLO 28.4 2007 2021 2013 446 46
Transaction 37 US CLO 9.3 2005 2017 2011 327 50
Transaction 38 US CLO 23.7 2007 2021 2013 344 42
Transaction 39 US CLO 7.8 2005 2017 2011 349 70
Transaction 40 US CLO 13.0 2006 2020 2011 417 39
Transaction 41 US CLO 22.5 2006 2020 2013 383 48
Transaction 42 US CLO 22.4 2007 2021 2014 409 47
Transaction 44 US CLO 22.3 2006 2018 2012 328 54
Transaction 45 US CLO 23.0 2006 2018 2012 316 46
Transaction 46 US CLO 21.3 2007 2019 2013 334 51
Transaction 47 US CLO 28.3 2006 2021 2013 338 47
Transaction 48 US CLO 23.0 2006 2019 2013 350 46
Transaction 49 US CLO 12.6 2005 2017 2011 358 40
Transaction 50 US CLO 12.3 2006 2018 2012 355 40
Transaction 51 US CLO 18.0 2007 2020 2013 393 53
Transaction 54 US CLO 0.5 2005 2017 2012 346 56
Transaction 55 US CLO 0.3 2005 2017 2011 350 39
Transaction 56 US CLO 23.0 2007 2019 2014 386 42
Transaction 57 US CLO 0.6 2007 2019 2014 386 42
Transaction 58 US CLO 21.8 2007 2019 2014 393 49
Transaction 59 US CLO 0.4 2007 2019 2014 393 49
Transaction 60 US CLO 18.8 2010 2021 2014 418 198
Transaction 61 US CLO 29.1 2007 2021 2014 341 45
Transaction 62 US CLO 25.3 2007 2020 2013 369 42
Transaction 63 US CLO 27.3 2007 2021 2013 404 53
Transaction 64 US CLO 15.4 2007 2021 2013 443 38
Transaction 65 US CLO 26.9 2006 2021 2013 375 47
Transaction 66 US CLO 21.3 2006 2020 2013 344 49
Transaction 67 US CLO 27.3 2007 2022 2014 337 46
Transaction 68 US CLO 19.3 2006 2020 2013 377 48
Transaction 69 US CLO 28.2 2007 2019 2013 378 44
Transaction 70 US CLO 24.6 2006 2020 2013 315 52
Transaction 71 US CLO 1.7 2006 2018 2012 355 40
Transaction 72 US CLO 4.8 2007 2019 2014 386 42
Transaction 73 US CLO 1.9 2007 2019 2014 386 42
Transaction 74 US CLO 5.5 2007 2019 2014 393 49
Transaction 75 US CLO 32.7 2011 2022 2014 419 168
Transaction 76 US CLO 1.9 2006 2018 2012 316 46
Transaction 77 US CLO 14.5 2011 2023 2016 424 212
Transaction 78 US CLO 22.9 2012 2023 2015 467 217
Transaction 79 US CLO 19.4 2012 2022 2015 446 215
Transaction 80 US CLO 22.7 2012 2022 2016 453 185
Transaction 81 US CLO 21.7 2012 2024 2016 475 216
Transaction 82 US CLO 25.4 2012 2022 2016 457 206
Transaction 83 US CLO 20.8 2013 2025 2017 406 193
Transaction 84 US CLO 24.6 2013 2023 2017 363 183
US CLO Subtotal: 1,327.1 396 74
Total CLO Portfolio: 1,653.3 395 70
</pre><pre>
Figure 25
Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG)
CLO Portfolio Details
As of March 31, 2013
Current Current Jr- Jr-Most O/C Annualized IRR ITD Cash
Cost of Funds Most O/C O/C Cushion (Loss) (ix) Received
Transaction(i) (bps)(v) Cushion(vi) at Close(vii) Gain of as % of
Cushion Cost (x)
(viii)
Transaction 1 59 (1.50%) 3.86% (0.93%) - 29.6%
Transaction 2 53 0.54% 3.60% (0.48%) 9.6% 78.1%
Transaction 3 71 2.64% 5.14% (0.35%) 12.1% 112.1%
Transaction 4 48 4.77% 5.76% (0.16%) 14.4% 86.4%
Transaction 5 60 1.04% 5.74% (0.83%) 8.4% 62.8%
Transaction 6 60 (0.16%) 4.70% (0.71%) 6.6% 49.7%
Transaction 7 45 1.69% 3.64% (0.32%) 5.8% 31.9%
Transaction 8 53 1.62% 4.98% (0.44%) 9.5% 87.1%
Transaction 9 46 1.69% 6.27% (0.76%) 6.8% 48.4%
Transaction 10 52 (1.73%) 4.54% (0.94%) 3.2% 32.7%
EUR CLO Subtotal: 54 1.04% 4.84% (0.61%) 58.8%
Transaction 11 46 5.30% 4.55% 0.11% 20.7% 165.6%
Transaction 12 46 5.27% 4.45% 0.13% 20.7% 163.2%
Transaction 13 48 4.98% 4.82% 0.02% 21.3% 176.4%
Transaction 14 50 3.69% 5.63% (0.32%) 19.1% 147.2%
Transaction 15 48 3.74% 4.21% (0.08%) 29.5% 193.3%
Transaction 16 45 3.37% 4.44% (0.16%) 21.1% 171.5%
Transaction 17 40 4.66% 4.24% 0.07% 23.4% 164.6%
Transaction 18 50 10.42% 4.77% 0.76% 19.8% 178.8%
Transaction 19 50 10.42% 4.77% 0.76% 23.6% 173.1%
Transaction 20 52 3.73% 5.28% (0.24%) 22.7% 178.7%
Transaction 21 56 3.39% 4.76% (0.21%) 19.3% 157.8%
Transaction 22 53 3.39% 5.00% (0.27%) 21.5% 151.1%
Transaction 23 66 3.59% 4.98% (0.24%) 20.5% 159.5%
Transaction 24 47 5.40% 4.17% 0.19% 17.9% 139.2%
Transaction 25 46 6.38% 4.13% 0.36% 22.5% 166.8%
Transaction 26 44 4.52% 4.05% 0.08% 19.8% 141.9%
Transaction 27 51 11.59% 6.11% 0.88% 32.6% 209.5%
Transaction 28 51 11.59% 6.11% 0.88% 43.6% 132.2%
Transaction 29 139 8.87% 4.82% 0.54% 18.3% 165.9%
Transaction 30 81 3.06% 5.16% (0.31%) 18.5% 148.0%
Transaction 31 62 4.25% 5.02% (0.10%) 16.4% 175.2%
Transaction 32 59 4.28% 5.57% (0.23%) 21.1% 145.2%
Transaction 33 98 5.58% 6.99% (0.20%) 14.0% 144.6%
Transaction 34 50 4.46% 6.66% (0.35%) 18.9% 156.2%
Transaction 35 59 2.49% 5.00% (0.37%) 19.8% 170.5%
Transaction 36 56 2.54% 5.18% (0.44%) 20.4% 147.9%
Transaction 37 80 7.54% 4.34% 0.42% 15.0% 156.7%
Transaction 38 42 3.29% 5.07% (0.29%) 27.7% 187.0%
Transaction 39 129 10.76% 3.15% 1.02% 9.2% 88.8%
Transaction 40 44 N/A N/A N/A 22.0% 174.8%
Transaction 41 49 4.32% 4.71% (0.06%) 21.8% 169.4%
Transaction 42 48 5.18% 3.92% 0.21% 21.7% 154.3%
Transaction 44 79 3.16% 4.16% (0.14%) 11.0% 120.3%
Transaction 45 46 1.86% 4.46% (0.41%) 9.8% 101.8%
Transaction 46 51 2.67% 4.33% (0.28%) 9.9% 90.4%
Transaction 47 43 2.95% 4.34% (0.22%) 21.3% 168.1%
Transaction 48 46 2.49% 5.71% (0.50%) 16.5% 127.1%
Transaction 49 45 4.54% 3.94% 0.08% 12.8% 117.0%
Transaction 50 42 3.81% 4.25% (0.06%) 13.9% 117.8%
Transaction 51 53 4.46% 4.47% (0.00%) 21.4% 156.9%
Transaction 54 81 9.75% 3.69% 0.76% 57.4% 873.5%
Transaction 55 50 8.39% 3.59% 0.63% 60.5% 816.2%
Transaction 56 42 4.70% 4.53% 0.03% 23.3% 167.7%
Transaction 57 42 4.70% 4.53% 0.03% 50.3% 897.6%
Transaction 58 49 3.71% 4.04% (0.06%) 25.6% 173.0%
Transaction 59 49 3.71% 4.04% (0.06%) 53.8% 1230.1%
Transaction 60 198 4.53% 4.50% 0.01% 10.9% 31.4%
Transaction 61 45 3.47% 4.04% (0.10%) 18.1% 123.2%
Transaction 62 42 4.57% 5.20% (0.10%) 22.1% 168.3%
Transaction 63 53 3.01% 4.78% (0.31%) 20.1% 143.7%
Transaction 64 38 N/A N/A N/A 22.9% 149.3%
Transaction 65 48 3.22% 4.96% (0.27%) 14.9% 110.9%
Transaction 66 49 3.93% 4.05% (0.02%) 22.3% 170.7%
Transaction 67 45 4.07% 4.38% (0.05%) 20.3% 146.7%
Transaction 68 48 5.56% 4.41% 0.18% 27.0% 205.9%
Transaction 69 44 6.86% 5.61% 0.21% 26.2% 188.4%
Transaction 70 52 5.19% 6.21% (0.16%) 19.0% 147.2%
Transaction 71 42 3.81% 4.25% (0.06%) 28.8% 79.9%
Transaction 72 42 4.70% 4.53% 0.03% 22.4% 70.3%
Transaction 73 42 4.70% 4.53% 0.03% 22.4% 70.3%
Transaction 74 49 3.71% 4.04% (0.06%) 24.1% 72.6%
Transaction 75 168 4.57% 4.05% 0.30% 12.9% 35.1%
Transaction 76 46 1.86% 2.43% (0.09%) 41.3% 78.2%
Transaction 77 213 5.48% 5.04% 0.34% 13.7% 18.1%
Transaction 78 217 4.69% 4.00% 0.58% 14.1% 26.1%
Transaction 79 215 4.25% 4.00% 0.22% 8.7% 18.0%
Transaction 80 185 4.27% 4.17% 0.12% 12.7% 14.1%
Transaction 81 217 4.47% 4.00% 0.86% 9.2% 4.9%
Transaction 82 207 4.18% 4.00% 0.37% 8.8% 1.1%
Transaction 83 193 4.02% 4.02% - 8.3% 0.0%
Transaction 84 183 4.02% 4.02% - 9.2% 0.0%
US CLO Subtotal: 77 4.40% 4.59% 0.01% 132.1%
Total CLO
Portfolio: 72 3.74% 4.64% (0.12%) 117.7%
</pre> Notes
(i) Transactions are investments made on a particular investment date. Multiple
transactions may be associated with the same tranche of the same CLO deal. Note that
Transaction 53 was removed from the table above, as the remaining value of the assets of
the CLO is immaterial. Transaction 53 continues to be held as of the end of March 2013.
(ii) The USD investment cost reflects a USD-EUR exchange rate fixed at a single
historical rate to avoid the impact of skewed weightings and FX volatility over time. As
such, the investment costs of European CLOs as shown in this table may not be comparable
to the investments costs as shown in TFG's financial statements.
(iii) Par weighted-average spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR (as appropriate) of the
underlying loan assets in each CLO's portfolio.
(iv) Notional weighted-average spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR (as appropriate) of the
debt tranches issued by each CLO, as of the closing date of each transaction.
(v) Notional weighted-average spread over LIBOR or EURIBOR (as appropriate) of the
debt tranches issued by each CLO, as of the most recent trustee report date.
(vi) The current junior-most O/C cushion is the excess (or deficit) of the junior-most
O/C test ratio over the test requirement, as of the latest trustee report available as of
the report date.
(vii) The junior-most O/C cushion at close is the excess (or deficit) of the
junior-most O/C test ratio over the test requirement that was expected on each deal's
closing date. Please note that two of TFG's investments are so called "par structures"
which don't include a junior O/C test. They have been marked by an "N/A" in the relevant
junior-most O/C test columns.
(viii) Calculated by annualizing the change from the expected closing date junior-most
O/C cushion to the current junior-most O/C cushion.
(ix) Calculated from TFG's investment date. Includes both historical cash flows
received to-date and prospective cash flows expected to be received, based on TFG's base
case modeling assumptions.
(x) Inception to report date cash flow received on each transaction as a percentage of
its original cost.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Paddy Dear
Reade Griffith
Byron Knief*
Rupert Dorey*
David Jeffreys*
Greville Ward*
*Independent Director
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
<pre>
Registered Office of TFG and the Master
Fund
Tetragon Financial Group Limited Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited
1st Floor Dorey Court
Admiral Park
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GYI 6HJ
Investment Manager
Tetragon Financial Management LP
399 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10022
United States of America
General Partner of Investment Manager
Tetragon Financial Management GP LLC
399 Park Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10022
United States of America
Investor Relations
David Wishnow / Yuko Thomas [email protected]
Press Inquiries
Brunswick Group
Andrew Garfield / Gill Ackers / Brian Buckley [email protected]
Auditors
KPMG Channel Islands Ltd
20 New Street
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GYI 4AN
Sub-Registrar and Transfer Agent
Computershare
One Wall Street
New York, NY 10286
United States of America
Issuing Agent, Dutch Paying and Transfer
Agent
Kas Bank N.V. Spuistraat 172
1012 VT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Legal Advisor (as to U.S. law)
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP One Ropemaker Street London EC2Y 9HR
United Kingdom
Legal Advisor (as to Guernsey law)
Ogier
Ogier House
St. Julian's Avenue
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GYI 1WA
Legal Advisor (as to Dutch law)
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V. Claude Debussylaan 80
1082 MD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Stock Listing
NYSE Euronext in Amsterdam
Administrator and Registrar
State Street (Guernsey) Limited
1st Floor Dorey Court
Admiral Park
St. Peter Port, Guernsey
Channel Islands GYI 6HJ
</pre> ENDNOTES
Executive Summary and Outlook
(1) TFG invests substantially all its capital through a master fund, Tetragon
Financial Group Master Fund Limited ("TFGMF"), in which it holds 100% of the issued
shares. In this report, unless otherwise stated, we report on the consolidated business
incorporating TFG and TFGMF. References to "we" are to Tetragon Financial Management LP,
TFG's investment manager.
(2) TFG's returns will most likely fluctuate with LIBOR. LIBOR directly flows through
some of TFG's investments and, as it can be seen as the risk-free short-term rate, it
should affect all of TFG's investments. In high-LIBOR environments, TFG should achieve
higher sustainable returns; in low-LIBOR environments, TFG should achieve lower
sustainable returns.
(3) Includes GreenOak funds and advisory assets, AUM for Polygon Recovery Fund LP,
Polygon Convertible Opportunity Master Fund, Polygon European Equity Opportunity Master
Fund and associated managed account, Polygon Mining Opportunity Master Fund, and Polygon
Global Equity Master Fund, as calculated by the applicable administrator. Includes, where
relevant, investments by Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited.
Key Metrics
(4) Please refer to Quarterly Financial Highlights on page 15 of this report for the
definition of Net Economic
Income.
(5) Please refer to Quarterly Financial Highlights on page 15 of this report for the
definition of Return on Equity.
(6) Please see endnote 2 above.
(7) Please see Figure 9 "TFG Asset Management Statement of Operations Q1 2013" on page
12 for the determination of TFG Asset Management EBITDA.
(8) Please refer to Quarterly Financial Highlights on page 15 of this report for the
definition of Adjusted EPS.
(9) Please refer to Quarterly Financial Highlights on page 15 of this report for the
definition of Pro Forma Fully
Diluted Shares and Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share.
(10) Please see endnote 2 above.
Investment Portfolio
(11) The CLO asset characterizations referenced above reflect the primary asset focus
of the vehicles. These transactions, however, may allow for limited exposure to other
asset classes including unsecured loans, high yield bonds, or structured finance
securities.
(12) Please note that TFG may hold more than one investment in any CLO transaction
within its portfolio.
(13) Based on the most recent trustee reports available as of 31 March 2013.
(14) In each case using the weighted-average U.S. GAAP shares outstanding during the
quarter (Q1 2013:
98,393,598 and Q4 2012: 108,865,740).
(15) Based on the most recent trustee reports available as of 31 March 2013.
(16) In each case using the weighted-average U.S. GAAP shares outstanding during the
quarter (Q1 2013:
98,393,598 and Q4 2012: 108,865,740).
(17) In each case using the weighted-average U.S. GAAP shares outstanding during the
quarter (Q1 2013:
98,393,598 and Q4 2012: 108,865,740).
(18) Based on the most recent trustee reports available as of 31 March 2013.
(19) Internal rate of return calculated using the XIRR function in Excel, reflecting
the timing of all investments and fair value (NAV/share) reported for the funds as of 31
March 2013.
(20) Internal rate of return calculated using the XIRR function in Excel, reflecting
the timing of all investments and fair value (NAV/share) reported for the funds as of 31
March 2013.
TFG Asset Management
(21) Nets off cost of recovery on "Other fee income" against this cost contained in
"operating, employee, and administrative expenses." Operating costs also removes
amortisation from the U.S. GAAP segmental report.
(22) Unrealised Polygon performance fees represent the fees calculated by the
applicable administrator of the relevant Polygon funds, in accordance with the applicable
fund constitutional documents, when determining net asset value at quarter end, less
certain assumed costs. Similar amounts, if any, from LCM and GreenOak are excluded from
this line item. Such fees would typically not be realised or recognised under US GAAP
until calendar year end, and are therefore subject to change based on fund performance
during the remainder of the year. There are can be no assurance that the company will
realise all or any portion of such amounts. For Q1
2013, this amount equaled $0.9 million before (1) an assumed imputed tax charge and
(2) estimated TFM performance fees reduced the net contribution to $0.5 million as shown
in Figure 9 and further represented in Figures 16 and 17 of this report.
(23) The LCM II, LCM III, LCM IV, LCM V, LCM VI, LCM VIII, LCM IX, LCM X, LCM XI, LCM
XII, and LCM XIII CLOs are referred to as the "LCM Cash Flow CLOs." The LCM VII CLO was a
market value CLO previously managed by LCM, which was liquidated commencing in 2008, and
is not included in the mentioned statistics. LCM I CLO has sold all of its assets and
repaid all of its liabilities with excess proceeds distributed to equity holders as of 31
December, 2012, and is therefore not included in the mentioned statistics. In
addition, these statistics do not include the performance of certain transactions that
were developed and previously managed by a third-party prior to being assigned to LCM,
some of which continue to be managed by LCM.
Financial Tables
(24) Unrealised Polygon performance fees represent the fees calculated by the
applicable administrator of the relevant Polygon funds, in accordance with the applicable
fund constitutional documents, when determining net asset value at quarter end, less
certain assumed costs. Similar amounts, if any, from LCM and GreenOak are excluded from
this line item. Such fees would typically not be realised or recognised under US GAAP
until calendar year end, and are therefore subject to change based on fund performance
during the remainder of the year. There are can be no assurance that the company will
realise all or any portion of such amounts. For Q1
2013, this amount equaled $0.9 million before (1) an assumed imputed tax charge and
(2) estimated TFM performance fees reduced the net contribution to $0.5 million as shown
in Figure 9 and further represented in Figures 16 and 17 of this report.
(25) Pro forma fully diluted NAV per Share seeks to reflect certain potential changes
to the total non-voting shares over the next few years, which may be utilized in the
calculation of NAV per Share. Specifically, the number of shares used to calculate U.S.
GAAP NAV per Share has been adjusted to incorporate:
(i) Shares which have been used as consideration for the acquisition of Polygon and
applicable stock dividends relating thereto, and which are held in escrow and are expected
to be released and incorporated into the U.S. GAAP NAV per Share over a five-year period.
(ii) The number of shares corresponding to the applicable intrinsic value of the
options issued to the Investment Manager at the time of the company's IPO with a strike
price of $10.00, to the extent such options are in the money at period end. The intrinsic
value of the manager (IPO) share options is calculated as the excess of (x) the closing
price of the shares as of the final trading day in the relevant period over (y) $10.00
(being the exercise price per share) times (z) 12,545,330 (being a number of shares
subject to the options before the application of potential anti-dilution). The terms of
exercise under the options allow for exercise using cash, as well as, with the consent of
the board of the Company, certain forms of cashless exercise. Each of these prescribed
methods of exercise may give rise to the issuance of a different number of shares than the
approach described herein. If the options were to be surrendered for their intrinsic value
with the board's consent, rather than exercised, the number of shares issued would equal
the intrinsic value divided by the closing price of the shares as of the final trading day
in the relevant period. This approach has been selected because we currently believe it is
more reasonably illustrative of a likely outcome if the options are exercised. The options
are exercisable until 26 April 2017.
Appendix II
(26) Citi Research - "Global Structured Credit Strategy" - 9 April 2013
(27) Citi Research - "Global Structured Credit Strategy" - 9 April 2013
Appendix III
(28) S&P/LCD News, "Loan default rate jumps in March as directory specters return," 1
April 2013.
(29) S&P/LCD News, "Loan default rate jumps in March as directory specters return," 1
April 2013.
(30) The calculation of TFG's lagging 12-month corporate loan default rate does not
include certain underlying investment collateral that was assigned a "Selective Default"
rating by one or more of the applicable rating agencies. Such Selected Defaults are
included the S&P/LCD lagging 12-month U.S. institutional loan default rate discussed
above. Furthermore, TFG's CLO equity and direct loan investment portfolio includes
approximately 10.4% CLOs with primary exposure to European senior secured loans and such
loans are included in the calculation of TFG's corporate default rate.
(31) S&P/LCD News, "Leveraged loan volume nears record in 1Q amid refinancing frenzy,"
28 March 2013.
(32) S&P/LCD Quarterly Review, Q1 2013.
(33) S&P/LCD News, "Leveraged loan volume nears record in 1Q amid refinancing frenzy,"
28 March 2013.
(34) S&P/LCD News, "Leveraged loan volume nears record in 1Q amid refinancing frenzy,"
28 March 2013.
(35) S&P/LCD News, "Leveraged loans return 0.82% in March; YTD return is 2.11%," 1
April 2013.
(36) S&P/LCD News, "(EUR) S&P ELLI: Loans gain 0.39%; 1Q13 return is 2.05%," 3 April
2013.
(37) S&P/LCD Leveraged Lending Review, Q1 2013.
(38) S&P/LCD News, "(EUR) ELLI repayments EUR1.6 billion in March," 8 April 2013.
(39) S&P/LCD Quarterly Review, Q1 2013.
(40) Morgan Stanley CLO Market Tracker, 8 April 2013; based on a surveillance universe
of 440 USD-denominated
CLOs and 184 Euro-denominated CLOs.
(41) Morgan Stanley CLO Market Tracker, 4 January 2013; based on a surveillance
universe of 487 USD- denominated CLOs and 194 Euro-denominated CLOs.
(42) Morgan Stanley CLO Market Tracker, 8 April 2013; based on a surveillance universe
of 440 USD-denominated
CLOs and 184 Euro-denominated CLOs.
(43) Morgan Stanley CLO Market Tracker, 4 January 2013; based on a surveillance
universe of 487 USD- denominated CLOs and 194 Euro-denominated CLOs.
(44) Morgan Stanley CLO Market Tracker, 8 April 2013.
(45) Morgan Stanley CLO Market Tracker, 8 April 2013.
<pre>
For further information, please contact:
TFG:
David Wishnow/Yuko Thomas
Investor Relations
[email protected]
Press Inquiries:
Brunswick Group
Gill Ackers/Brian Buckley
+44-(0)20-7404-5959
[email protected]
</pre>
The content and accuracy of news releases published on this site and/or
distributed by PR Newswire or its partners are the sole responsibility of the
originating company or organisation. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the
accuracy of our services, such releases are not actively monitored or reviewed
by PR Newswire or its partners and under no circumstances shall PR Newswire or
its partners be liable for any loss or damage resulting from the use of such
information. All information should be checked prior to publication.
Share this article