Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG) is a Guernsey closed-ended investment company
traded on the NYSE Euronext in Amsterdam under the ticker symbol "TFG".
In this update, unless otherwise stated, we report on the consolidated business
incorporating TFG and Tetragon Financial Group Master Fund Limited.[1]
In this update, we provide additional information on "U.S. GAAP NAV per Share" and
a
new metric, "Pro forma fully diluted NAV per Share". We believe this new metric
(described
below in section 1.2) may be helpful in illustrating the potential impact of various
share
changes on Net Asset Value ("NAV") per Share and we intend to include the item in
future
reporting. We also explain the recalibration of certain inputs used in the
determination
of the fair value of TFG's CLO equity investments.
1. NAV per Share movements
The figure below shows how U.S. GAAP NAV per Share and pro forma fully diluted NAV
per
Share metrics have evolved over the last four quarters.
<start_table>
Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 2012
US GAAP NAV per Share 13.12 13.75 14.29 16.41
Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share 13.12 13.75 14.29 14.91
<end_table>
1.1 U.S. GAAP NAV per Share movements:
NAV per Share calculated under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S.
GAAP") for TFG as at December 31, 2012 was $16.41, up from $14.91 as at November 30,
2012.
Two events significantly contributed to the increase in U.S. GAAP NAV per Share in
December. Firstly, as announced on December 7, 2012, in conjunction with a "modified
Dutch
auction" tender offer (the "Offer"), TFG purchased 15,384,615 TFG non-voting shares at
a
price of $9.75 for $150 million. As the purchase price of the Offer was significantly
below the prevailing U.S. GAAP NAV per Share this had the impact of increasing U.S.
GAAP
NAV per Share by $0.85.
Secondly, as at December 31, 2012, certain inputs into the CLO valuation model were
recalibrated, including forward-looking default assumptions and discount rates utilized
in
the determination of the applicable fair value of each deal. The net impact of these
changes was to increase fair value and thus to increase the U.S. GAAP NAV per Share by
$0.50 on a net basis. A description of these changes is set forth below in section 2.
<start_table>
Gross Impact on Fair Value U.S. CLOs EUR CLOs Total
$ (millions) $ (millions) $ (millions)
Recalibration of Default Assumptions 20.1 -1.1 19
Recalibration of Discount Rates 45.3 7.1 52.4
Total 65.4 6 71.4
<end_table>
1.2 Pro Forma Fully Diluted NAV per Share:
We have also included in the December 2012 monthly update the calculation of a "Pro
forma fully diluted NAV per Share" to seek to reflect certain potential changes to the
total non-voting shares over the next few years, which may be utilized in the
calculation
of NAV per Share. Specifically, the number of shares used to calculate U.S. GAAP NAV
per
Share has been adjusted to incorporate:
<pre>
- Shares which have been used as consideration for the acquisition of
Polygon Management L.P. and applicable stock dividends relating thereto, and which
are
held in escrow and are expected to be released and incorporated into the U.S. GAAP
NAV
per Share over a five year period.[2]
</pre><pre>
- The number of shares corresponding to the applicable intrinsic value of
the options issued to the Investment Manager at the time of the company's IPO with
a
strike price of $10.00, to the extent such options are in the money at period end.
As
of December 31, 2012, the TFG share price was $9.67 and therefore such options were
out of the money.[3]
</pre> The Pro forma fully diluted NAV per Share was $14.65 at 2012 year-end based on
110.64
million shares outstanding in respect of such calculation as outlined in the table
below.
As at December 31, 2012, the U.S. GAAP NAV per Share is $16.41 based on 98.80 million
shares outstanding. As of December 31, 2012 TFG had approximately 133.75 million shares
legally issued and outstanding.
The table below illustrates the three measures of shares described above - legal
shares issued and outstanding, U.S. GAAP shares outstanding and pro forma fully diluted
shares. Legal shares issued and outstanding is used, for example, in TFG's monthly
reporting, including to applicable regulatory authorities.
<start_table>
Dec 31 2012
Shares Reconciliation Shares (millions)
Legal Shares Issued and Outstanding 133.75
Less: Shares Held In Subsidiary 16.60
Less: Shares Held In Treasury 6.50
Less: Escrow Shares 11.84
U.S. GAAP Shares Outstanding 98.80
Add: Manager (IPO) Share Options 0
Add: Escrow Shares 11.84
Pro Forma Fully Diluted Shares 110.64
<end_table>
2. Fair Value Determination for TFG's CLO Equity Investments:
In accordance with the valuation policies set forth on the company's website, the
values of TFG's CLO equity investments are determined using a third-party cash flow
modeling tool. The model contains certain assumption inputs that are reviewed and
adjusted
as appropriate to factor in how historic, current and potential market developments
(examined through, for example, forward-looking observable data) might potentially
impact
the performance of TFG's CLO equity investments. Since this involves modeling, among
other
things, forward projections over multiple years, this is not an exercise in
recalibrating
future assumptions to the latest quarter's historical data.
Subject to the foregoing, when determining the U.S. GAAP-compliant fair value of
TFG's
portfolio, the company seeks to derive a value at which market participants could
transact
in an orderly market and also seeks to benchmark the model inputs and resulting outputs
to
observable market data when available and appropriate. Please refer to the 2011 Annual
Report for a more detailed description of the cash flow projection and discounting
process.
2.1 Forward-looking CLO Equity Cash Flow Modeling Assumptions Recalibrated in Q4
2012:
The Investment Manager reviews and, when appropriate, adjusts in consultation with
TFG's audit committee, the CLO equity investment portfolio's modeling assumptions as
described above. At the end of Q4 2012, certain key assumptions relating to defaults
were
recalibrated. Those relating to recoveries, prepayments and reinvestment prices were
unchanged from the previous quarter.
U.S. CLOs - default assumptions recalibrated
For the U.S. deals, near-term default assumptions were unchanged but medium-term
default multiples were reduced to reflect, among other things, the perceived decline in
concern over the so-called "maturity wall". These changes, which are detailed in the
table
below, had a positive impact on the undiscounted future projected cash flows of the
U.S.
deals.
<start_table>
Variable Year Current Assumptions Prior Assumptions
CADR
1.0x WARF-implied 1.0x WARF-implied
2013 default rate (2.2%) default rate (2.2%)
1.0x WARF-implied 1.5x WARF-implied
2014 default rate (2.2%) default rate (3.3%)
1.25x WARF-implied 1.5x WARF-implied
2015-2016 default rate (2.7%) default rate (3.3%)
1.25x WARF-implied 1.0x WARF-implied
2017 default rate (2.7%) default rate (2.2%)
1.0x WARF-implied 1.0x WARF-implied
Thereafter default rate (2.2%) default rate (2.2%)
Recovery Rate
Until deal
maturity 73% 73%
Prepayment Rate
Until deal 20.0% p.a. on loans; 20.0% p.a. on loans;
maturity 0.0% on bonds 0.0% on bonds
Reinvestment Price
Until deal
maturity 100% 100%
<end_table>
European CLOs - default assumptions recalibrated
For the European deals, an elevated default multiple was maintained in the near
term,
but the medium term multiple was recalibrated higher bringing it in line with the U.S.
deals, and reflecting some of the enhanced risks during that period, including the
percentage of loans maturing. For European deals, this change resulted in a reduction
in
future undiscounted projected cash flows.
<start_table>
Variable Year Current Assumptions Prior Assumptions
CADR
1.5x WARF-implied 1.5x WARF-implied
2013-2014 default rate (3.1%) default rate (3.1%)
1.25x WARF-implied 1.0x WARF-implied
2015-2017 default rate (2.6%) default rate (2.1%)
1.0x WARF-implied 1.0x WARF-implied
Thereafter default rate (2.1%) default rate (2.1%)
Recovery Rate
Until deal
maturity 68% 68%
Prepayment Rate
Until deal 20.0% p.a. on loans; 20.0% p.a. on loans;
maturity 0.0% on bonds 0.0% on bonds
Reinvestment Price
Until deal
maturity 100% 100%
<end_table>
These key average assumption variables include the modeling assumptions disclosed
as a
weighted average (by U.S. dollar amount) of the individual deal assumptions, aggregated
by
geography (i.e. U.S. and European). Such weighted averages may change from month to
month
due to movements in the amortized costs of the deals, even without changes to the
underlying assumptions. Each individual deal's assumptions may differ from this
geographical average and vary across the portfolio.
The reinvestment price, assumptions about reinvestment spread and reinvestment life
are also input into the model to generate an effective spread over LIBOR. Newer vintage
CLOs may have a higher weighted-average reinvestment spread over LIBOR or shorter
reinvestment life assumptions than older deals. Across the entire CLO portfolio, the
reinvestment price assumption of 100% for U.S. deals and European deals with their
respective assumed weighted-average reinvestment spreads, generates an effective spread
over LIBOR of approximately 284 bps on broadly syndicated U.S. loans, 272 bps on
European
loans, and 328 bps on middle market loans.
2.2 Application of Discount Rate to Projected CLO Equity Cash Flows: 2005 - 2007
vintage deals:
In determining the applicable rates to use to discount projected cash flows, an
analysis of observable risk premium data is undertaken. Observable risk premia such as
BB
and BBB CLO tranche spreads decreased late in Q3 2012 and we noted in TFG's Q3 2012
performance report that we would continue to monitor closely over the course of Q4 2012
whether these reductions were sustained, before considering a reduction in applicable
discount rates. In Q4 2012 observable data has confirmed the re-rating of CLO risk,
albeit
the trend has continued at a slower pace. For example, according to Citibank research,
the
spread on originally BB-rated U.S. CLO tranches decreased from approximately 11% at the
end of Q2 2012 to 8% as of the end of September 2012 and further reduced to
approximately
7% at the end of December.[4]
As a result of the observed continued tightening of these spreads and overall
reduction in risk premia, the discount rates for the U.S. deals have been reduced to
17.5%
for strong deals and to 22.5% for other deals.
Per Citibank research, European originally BB-rated tranche yields have followed a
similar trajectory to U.S. spreads over the last two quarters, reducing from 22% at the
end of Q2 2012 to 16% at the end of Q3 2012 before a further reduction to 14% in Q4
2012.
As a result of this reduction in risk premia, the discount rates for European deals
have
been reduced to 27.5%, which are still significantly above the U.S. deal discount
rates,
reflecting in part the ongoing uncertainty surrounding Europe.
Previously on average, the discount rate being applied to the future cash flows was
greater than the weighted-average IRR on pre-crisis deals, so the aggregate fair value
for
both U.S. and European deals was lower than its amortized cost. The difference between
these two figures was characterized as the "ALR Fair Value Adjustment" or "ALR". Post
this
recalibration this is no longer the case for U.S. deals so there is no ALR to report in
respect of such deals. For European deals at the end of Q4 the ALR stands at $86.6
million
compared to $97.9 million at the end of Q3.
2.3 2010-2012 vintage deals
The applicable discount rate for newer vintage deals is determined with reference
to
each deal's specific IRR, which, in the absence of other observable data points, is
deemed
to be the most appropriate indication of the current risk premium on these structures.
At
the end of Q4 2012, the weighted-average discount rate (and IRR) on these deals was
12.4%.
Such deals represented approximately 14.3% of the CLO equity portfolio by fair value
(up
from 12.8% at the end of Q3 2012). We will continue to monitor observable data on these
newer vintage transactions to determine whether the IRR remains the appropriate
discount
rate.
2.4 Effect on fair value and net income of recalibration of certain inputs into the
CLO model
Overall, the net impact of the recalibration of certain forward-looking default
assumptions and discount rates described above led to an overall increase in fair value
of
the total CLO equity portfolio of approximately $71.4 million, or $53.6 million in
bottom
line net income.
[1] TFG invests substantially all its capital through a master fund, Tetragon
Financial Group Master Fund Limited ("TFGMF") in which it holds a 100% share.
[2] Please see the press release of October 29, 2012 noting TFG's acquisition of
Polygon Management L.P. and certain of its affiliates.
[3] The intrinsic value of the options will be calculated as the excess of (x) the
closing price of the shares as of the final trading day in the relevant period over (y)
$10.00 (being the exercise price per share) times (z) 12,545,330 (being a number of
shares
subject to the options before the application of potential anti-dilution). The terms of
exercise under the options allow for exercise using cash, as well as, with the consent
of
the board of the Company, certain forms of cashless exercise. Each of these prescribed
methods of exercise may give rise to the issuance of a different number of shares than
the
approach described herein. If the options were to be surrendered for their intrinsic
value
with the board's consent, rather than exercised, the number of shares issued would
equal
the intrinsic value divided by the closing price of the shares as of the final trading
day
in the relevant period. This approach has been selected because we currently believe it
is
more reasonably illustrative of a likely outcome if the options are exercised. The
options
are exercisable until April 26, 2017.
[4] Citi Global Structured Credit Strategy 22 January 2013
The content and accuracy of news releases published on this site and/or
distributed by PR Newswire or its partners are the sole responsibility of the
originating company or organisation. Whilst every effort is made to ensure the
accuracy of our services, such releases are not actively monitored or reviewed
by PR Newswire or its partners and under no circumstances shall PR Newswire or
its partners be liable for any loss or damage resulting from the use of such
information. All information should be checked prior to publication.
Share this article