The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Lululemon Athletica, Oracle, Google, Apple and Microsoft

Sep 13, 2011, 09:30 ET from Zacks Investment Research, Inc.

CHICAGO, Sept. 13, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Zacks.com announces the list of stocks featured in the Analyst Blog. Every day the Zacks Equity Research analysts discuss the latest news and events impacting stocks and the financial markets. Stocks recently featured in the blog include: Lululemon Athletica Inc. (Nasdaq: LULU), Oracle Corp. (Nasdaq: ORCL), Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG), Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT).

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20101027/ZIRLOGO)

Get the most recent insight from Zacks Equity Research with the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: http://at.zacks.com/?id=5513

Here are highlights from Monday's Analyst Blog:

Lululemon Beats Estimates

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (Nasdaq: LULU) reported second-quarter 2011 earnings of 26 cents a share, up 73.0% from the year-ago figure of 15 cents, handily beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 22 cents.

Financial Details

The company's 20.0% increase in comparable-store sales and 93.0% rise in Direct-to-Consumer revenue aided 39.0% year-over-year increase in second-quarter 2011 total revenue, which climbed to $212.3 million from $152.2 million reported in the year-ago quarter.

Gross profit for the quarter came in at $122.1 million and increased 52.0% year over year, reflecting a high double-digit growth in top line. Gross margin improved 470 basis points to 57.5% compared with 52.8% in the prior period, primarily due to reduced cost of goods sold as a percentage of total revenue.

Operating income for the quarter was $59.5 million compared with $34.2 million a year ago while operating margin expanded 550 basis points to 28%, reflecting operational efficiencies achieved by the company.

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the quarter was $264.7 million and stockholders' equity came in at $499.7 million. The company is free from long-term debts. Cash flow from operating activities for the year-to-date period came in at $19.5 million compared with $34.6 million in the prior period.

Store Update

Lululemon ended the quarter with 151 total stores.

Third-Quarter and Fiscal 2011 Outlook

Management estimates that existing store upgrades and new store openings have the potential to generate net revenues of $225.0 to $230.0 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2011. Comps are expected to be in the low-to-mid teens for the reported quarter. Based on these expectations, the company expects its earnings for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 to be in the range of 22 to 24 cents per share.

For fiscal 2011, the company expects its earnings to be in the range of $1.10 to $1.14 per share.  The company expects revenue guidance for fiscal 2011 in the range of $930.0 to $950.0 million.

Our Take

We believe that Lululemon's strategic initiatives coupled with better inventory management and e-commerce business will boost both its top and bottom lines. However, the company faces intense competition from national and regional competitors, which may dent its future performance.

Currently, Lululemon maintains a Zacks #3 Rank, which translates into a short-term Hold rating. Moreover, we retain a long-term Neutral recommendation on the stock.

Oracle, Google to Settle Claims

According to a recent report from news agency Bloomberg, Oracle Corp. (Nasdaq: ORCL) and Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG) have agreed to attend a settlement discussion over the copyright- and patent-infringement lawsuit filed by Oracle last year.

As per the order of the U.S magistrate, both the companies will be represented by their respective Chief Operating Officers (CEO). The settlement meeting is scheduled on September 19, 2011 and will be mediated by the U.S. Magistrate Judge.

The attendance of the two CEO's, Oracle's Larry Ellison and Google's Larry Page in the settlement meeting was strongly recommended in the September 8 court filing by the U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who is presiding over the case. The recommendation followed Oracle's complaint regarding the failure of its out-of-court settlement efforts due to Google's reluctance.

In August 2010, Oracle filed a lawsuit against Google alleging violation of seven Oracle patents. The main conflict was regarding Google's Dalvik process virtualization machine ("VM"), which was developed using Java and serves as the backbone of the Android operating system.

Oracle claimed damages worth billions of dollars and appealed for the annihilation of all the infringed products. However, Google denied any infringement and complained that Oracle's damage claims were expansive.

Google said that Sun Microsystems (which was acquired by Oracle in early 2010) had offered to license its Java technology for $100.0 million, and Oracle overlooked this particular fact at the time of calculating its damages.

In July 2011, the U.S. District Court Judge ordered Oracle to reduce its $6.1 billion damage claim for alleged infringement of Oracle's Java patents, citing it to be expansive and noted that the "starting point" of the damages should be approximately $100.0 million, depending on various factors.

The judge, however, dismissed Google's claim that its advertising revenue was not related to the value of Android and should therefore not be a part of Oracle's damages. The judge warned Google that if the company is found guilty of infringement, the court may issue a permanent injunction against the sale of Android-based devices going forward.

However, the court battle turned bitter when Oracle said that it had come across an e-mail from a Google executive to the head of Google's Android division, which showed that Google recognized that it needed a license for Java. Google asked the judge to withdraw the e-mail, saying it was supposed to remain confidential and that Oracle wrongly revealed it. However, the judge overruled Google's request.

Google argued that some files it copied from Java are insignificant because they are test files. Google also said that the copying was required for compatibility because there was not any other language it could use. Google claimed that there had been no infringement on Oracle's copyright in its implementation of Android.

Based on this theory, Google requested the court to make a summary judgment citing four technicalities that were set aside by the court. Google's motion included a request for the fixation of period of infringement from the time Oracle first gave notice of infringement to Google.

It also claimed that the Oracle engineers working at Google were not involved with the technologies under dispute, so neither they nor Google could be held responsible for any wrong doing with respect to hiring them. Google's argument centers on the fact that it offers Android for free and so its advertising revenue should not be used to pay for damages related to sales by foreign companies in infringement of Oracle patents. 

However, Oracle strongly opposed the request and asked the judge to go ahead with the trial. Oracle argued that Google took only the parts it wanted and created many other application programming interfaces (API), incompatible for Android. As a result, many programs written in Java for other platforms will not run on Android, and many programs written for Android will not run on Java platforms and devices.

Oracle also claimed that till date no court had found APIs for software like Java ineligible for copyright protection. Oracle argued that program names, even subroutine names, should have the same copyright protection as the underlying code.

Oracle also said that Google's actions have made it impossible for the company to enter the mobile market in the future. A three-week jury trial of the case is scheduled for a hearing on October 31, 2011.

Recommendation

We believe an amicable settlement between the two giants will benefit both the companies going forward. We expect Oracle to settle for a licensing fee, while the settlement will ensure Google's uninterrupted growth of the Android operating system (It is the hottest-selling mobile OS in the U.S. and expanding globally) over the long term.

However, if the settlement fails, we believe the stakes are high for both companies. If Google is able to defend itself successfully, the company would get off with legal hassles and expenses alone. However, if it goes in Oracle's favor (chances are it will, since Oracle no doubt considered the matter before it acquired Sun), then Oracle would benefit immensely in terms of cash compensation.

Moreover, Oracle's win will have far-reaching consequences for companies such as Google, which depends heavily on open source. Interoperability within different software will be practically impossible without the clear permission and royalty payments to the copyright holders. On the other hand, it would benefit companies like Oracle, Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) who are extremely zealous in protecting their copyrights.

We have an Outperform recommendation on Oracle over the long term and a Neutral recommendation on Google. Currently, both the companies have a Zacks #3 Rank, which implies a Hold rating in the near term.

 Want more from Zacks Equity Research? Subscribe to the free Profit from the Pros newsletter: http://at.zacks.com/?id=5515.

About Zacks Equity Research

Zacks Equity Research provides the best of quantitative and qualitative analysis to help investors know what stocks to buy and which to sell for the long-term.

Continuous coverage is provided for a universe of 1,150 publicly traded stocks. Our analysts are organized by industry which gives them keen insights to developments that affect company profits and stock performance. Recommendations and target prices are six-month time horizons.

Zacks "Profit from the Pros" e-mail newsletter provides highlights of the latest analysis from Zacks Equity Research. Subscribe to this free newsletter today: http://at.zacks.com/?id=5517

About Zacks

Zacks.com is a property of Zacks Investment Research, Inc., which was formed in 1978 by Leon Zacks. As a PhD from MIT Len knew he could find patterns in stock market data that would lead to superior investment results. Amongst his many accomplishments was the formation of his proprietary stock picking system; the Zacks Rank, which continues to outperform the market by nearly a 3 to 1 margin. The best way to unlock the profitable stock recommendations and market insights of Zacks Investment Research is through our free daily email newsletter; Profit from the Pros. In short, it's your steady flow of Profitable ideas GUARANTEED to be worth your time! Register for your free subscription to Profit from the Pros at http://at.zacks.com/?id=5518.

Visit http://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release.

Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/zacksresearch

Join us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/pages/Zacks-Investment-Research/57553657748?ref=ts

Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should always research companies and securities before making any investments. Nothing herein should be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security.

Media Contact
Zacks Investment Research
800-767-3771 ext. 9339
support@zacks.com
http://www.zacks.com

SOURCE Zacks Investment Research, Inc.



RELATED LINKS

http://www.zacks.com