Top Five Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Services Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis
NEW YORK, Oct. 31, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:
http://www.reportlinker.com/p01023623/Top-Five-Global-Oil-and-Gas-Field-Equipment-and-Services-Companies-Performance-Strategies-and-Competitive-Analysis.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Oil_and_Gas_energy
Background:
The global oil and gas field equipment and services industry hasexperienced steady growth over the last five years, and it is expected to continue its solid upward momentum, reaching approximately US $613 billion in 2017 with a CAGR of 6.9% over the next five years. Lucintel, a leading global management consulting and market research firm, has conducted a competitive analysis of the global oil and gas field equipment and service providers and presents its findings in "Top 5 Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Services Companies: Performance, Strategies and Competitive Analysis." The report provides insight into the performance of the top five oil and gas field equipment and service companies in the world. The analysis highlights the companies that are performing the best among their peer group and in which specific areas, clarifies leading performance standards, and highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the companies covered. The oil and gas equipment and services industry, which is considered fragmented, comprises exploration and evaluation, well completion and production, equipment and infrastructure, and drilling-related services. Companies that provide oil and gas field equipment and services are approaching market opportunities with starkly different strategies. Lucintel's research indicates that North America presents the greatest growth potential during the forecast period.Asia Pacific is currently a small industry, but with an improving economy, good growth potential exists due to the discovery of new reserves. This study is intended to provide industry leaders with a competitive benchmarking of the world's top five oil and gas field equipment and service companies. The study provides up-to-date information on market share, profit margins, capabilities, and strategies of the leaders. The report can help current suppliers realistically assess their capabilities and strategies versus leading competitors. It is designed to provide executives with strategically significant competitor information, data, analysis, and insight, all of which are critical to the development and implementation of effective marketing and sales plans. This report will save hundreds of hours of your own personal research time and will significantly benefit you in expanding your business opportunities in global retail companies. In today's chaotic economy, you need every advantage that you can find to keep ahead in your business.
Features of this Report:
In Lucintel's newest competitive research study on the world's oil and gas field equipment & services companies, we thoroughly profile following five companies with detailed competitive assessments:
· Baker Hughes, Inc.
· Halliburton
· National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
· Saipem S.p.A
· Schlumberger Limited The detailed analysis of each company offers a critical view into key strategic areas, including:
· Company overview
· Benchmarking (financial and market)
· SWOT analysis
· Product positioning
· Marketing strategy and tactics
· Corporate strategy
To make any investment, business, or strategic decisions, you need adequate and timely information. This market report fulfills this core need. This is an indispensable reference guide for industry executives who are dealing with oil and gas field equipment industry. Some of the features of this multi-client market intelligence report are:
· Market size estimates in terms of (US $) value by segments of the oil and gas field equipment & services companies
· Regional analysis: oil and gas field equipment & services companies manufacturing companiesbreakdown by key regions (North America, Europe, APAC, and ROW)
· Market trends, drivers and forecasts
· Competitive benchmarking of each players against their financial and market strength
· Global and regional market share estimates for the top players
· Product line overview and positioning of top players
· SWOT analysis of the leaders
· Marketing strategy and tactics
· Corporate strategy
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary
2. Market Definition and Scope
3. Market Opportunity
– Supply Chain
– Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Company Profile on Following Parameters
Company Overview
Benchmarking (Financial & Market)
SWOT Analysis
Product Positioning
Marketing Strategy and Tactics
Corporate Strategy
5. Company Profile on Baker Hughes Incorporated
6. Company Profile onHalliburton
7. Company Profile onNational Oilwell Varco, Inc
8. Company Profile onSaipem S.p.A.
9. Company Profile onSchlumberger Limited
List of Figures and Charts
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Figure 3.1: Supply chain for oil and gas field equipment and services market
Figure 3.2: Global oil and gas field equipment and services industry trend (2006-2011)
Figure 3.3: Global oil and gas field equipment and services industry regional trend (2006-
2011) US $B
Figure 3.4: Global oil and gas field equipment and services industry regional trend (2006-
2011) (%)
Figure 3.5: Global oil and gas field equipment and services industry segment trend
(2006-2011) US $B
Figure 3.6: Global oil and gas field equipment and services industry segment trend
(2006-2011) (%)
Figure 3.7: Global oil and gas field equipment and services market opportunity by region
(2012-2017) (%)
Figure 3.8: Global oil and gas field equipment and services market opportunity by
segment (2012-2017) (%)
CHAPTER 4.Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Figure 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top 5 global oil and gas field equipment and
services companies
Figure 4.2: Gross profit and net profit of top 5 players (2011)
Figure 4.3: Financial analysis – growth leadership quadrant (2011)
Figure 4.4: Industry share of top players (2006) (%)
Figure 4.5: Industry share of top players (2011) (%)
Figure 4.6: Industry share analysis (2006) (%)
Figure 4.7: Industry share analysis (2011) (%)
Figure 4.8: Global market share analysis (2011) (%)
Figure 4.9: Global market Fragmentation 2011
Figure 4.10: Market value North America: US $B
Figure 4.11: Market value Europe: US $B
Figure 4.12: Market value Asia Pacific: US $B
Figure 4.13: Market value ROW: US $B
Figure 4.14: Regional evaluation 2011 (US $M)
Figure 4.15: Regional evaluation 2011 (%)
Figure 4.16: North American revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.17: Europe revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.18: Asia Pacific revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.19: Row revenue trend for top players 2007-2011 (US $B)
Figure 4.20: Lucintel triad - top 5 major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Incorporated
Figure 5.1: Baker Hughes Incorporated revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 5.2: Lucintel triad – Baker Hughes Incorporated
Figure 5.3: Financial benchmarking of Baker Hughes Incorporated against top 3 and top
5 industry players' average
Figure 5.4: Financial benchmarking of Baker Hughes Incorporated against Top 5 best
Figure 5.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated (2007-
2011) in US $B
Figure 5.6: Global market share trend for Baker Hughes Incorporated (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 5.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated
2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.8: European industry revenue trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated 2007-
2011 in US $B
Figure 5.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated 2007-2011
in US $B
Figure 5.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated 2007-2011
in US $B
Figure 5.11: North American market share trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated
2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 5.12: European market share trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated 2007-2011
in (%)
Figure 5.13: APAC market share trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated 2007-2011 in
(%)
Figure 5.14: ROW market share trend versus Baker Hughes Incorporated 2007-2011 in
(%)
Figure 5.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in US $B
Figure 5.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in %
Figure 5.17: Comparison of Baker Hughes' R&D expenditure versus top 3 & top 5
players' average- 2011
Figure 5.18: Baker Hughes Incorporated productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.19: Baker Hughes Incorporated fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 5.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Figure 6.1: Halliburton revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 6.2: Lucintel triad - Halliburton
Figure 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against top 3 and top 5 industry
players' average
Figure 6.4: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against Top 5 best
Figure 6.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Halliburton (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 6.6: Global market share trend for Halliburton (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 6.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in US
$B
Figure 6.8: European industry revenue trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.11: North American market share trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.12: European market share trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.13: APAC market share trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.14: ROW market share trend versus Halliburton 2007-2011 in (%)
Figure 6.15: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in US $B
Figure 6.16: Trend in R&D expenses 2006-2011 in %
Figure 6.17: Comparison of Halliburton R&D expenditure versus top 3 & top 5 players'
average-2011
Figure 6.18: Halliburton productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.19: Halliburton fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 6.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco, Inc
Figure 7.1: National Oilwell Varco, Inc revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 7.2: Lucintel triad - National Oilwell Varco, Inc
Figure 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco, Inc against top 3 and top 5
industry players' average
Figure 7.4: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco, Inc against Top 5 best
Figure 7.5: Global industry revenue trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-2011)
in US $B
Figure 7.6: Global market share trend for National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 7.7: North American industry revenue trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc
(2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 7.8: European industry revenue trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-
2011) in US $B
Figure 7.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-2011)
in US $B
Figure 7.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-2011)
in US $B
Figure 7.11: North American market share trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-
2011) in (%)
Figure 7.12: European market share trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-2011)
in (%)
Figure 7.13: APAC market share trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-2011) in
(%)
Figure 7.14: ROW market share trend versus National Oilwell Varco, Inc (2007-2011) in
(%)
Figure 7.15: National Oilwell Varco, Inc productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 7.16: National Oilwell Varco, Inc fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 7.17: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Saipem S.p.A.
Figure 8.1: Saipem S.p.A. revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 8.2: Lucintel triad - Saipem S.p.A.
Figure 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A. against top 3 and top 5 industry
players' average
Figure 8.4: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A. against Top 5 best
Figure 8.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.6: Global market share trend for Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in
US $B
Figure 8.8: European industry revenue trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in US $B
Figure 8.11: North American market share trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in
(%)
Figure 8.12: European market share trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.13: APAC market share trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.14: ROW market share trend versus Saipem S.p.A. (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 8.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US$ B
Figure 8.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in %
Figure 8.17: Comparison of Saipem S.p.A. R&D expenditure versus top 3 & top 5 players'
average- 2011
Figure 8.18: Saipem S.p.A. productivity: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 8.19: Saipem S.p.A. fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US$ M
Figure 8.20: Strategic execution
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Schlumberger Limited
Figure 9.1: Schlumberger Limited revenue by business structure 2011
Figure 9.2: Lucintel triad - Schlumberger Limited
Figure 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Limited against top 3 and top 5
industry players' average
Figure 9.4: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Limited against Top 5 best
Figure 9.5: Global industry revenue trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011) in
US $B
Figure 9.6: Global market share trend for Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.7: North American industry revenue trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-
2011) in US $B
Figure 9.8: European industry revenue trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011)
in US $B
Figure 9.9: APAC industry revenue trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011) in
US $B
Figure 9.10: ROW industry revenue trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011) in
US $B
Figure 9.11: North American market share trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-
2011) in (%)
Figure 9.12: European market share trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011) in
(%)
Figure 9.13: APAC market share trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.14: ROW market share trend versus Schlumberger Limited (2007-2011) in (%)
Figure 9.15: Trend in R&D expenses (2006-2011) in US $B
Figure 9.16: Trend in R&D expenses (2007-2011) in %
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Schlumberger Limited R&D expenditure versus top 3 & top 5
players' average- 2011
Figure 9.18: Schlumberger Limited productivity: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.19: Schlumberger Limited fixed asset value: 2007-2011 in US $M
Figure 9.20: Strategic execution
List of Tables
CHAPTER 3. Market Opportunity
Table 3.1: Global oil and gas field equipment and services market parameters
2011
Table 3.2: Relative market attractiveness by region
Table 3.3: Growth rate by region (2006-2011)
Table 3.4: Growth rate by segment (2006-2011)
CHAPTER 4. Competitive Benchmarking (Financial and Market)
Table 4.1: Financial benchmarking of top 5 global oil and gas field equipment and
services companies
Table 4.2: Key financial parameters for top 5 oil and gas field equipment and
services companies
Table 4.3: Competitors based on markets served
Table 4.4: Lucintel triad - top 5 major players
CHAPTER 5. Company Profile of Baker Hughes Incorporated
Table 5.1: Market served: Baker Hughes Incorporated
Table 5.2: Lucintel triad - Baker Hughes Incorporated
Table 5.3: Financial benchmarking of Baker Hughes Incorporated against best
and against top 3 and top 10 industry players' average
Table 5.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 5.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 5.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 5.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 6. Company Profile of Halliburton
Table 6.1: Market served - Halliburton
Table 6.2: Lucintel triad - Halliburton
Table 6.3: Financial benchmarking of Halliburton against best and against top 3
and top 10 industry players' average
Table 6.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 6.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 6.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 6.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 7. Company Profile of National Oilwell Varco, Inc
Table 7.1: Market served - National Oilwell Varco, Inc
Table 7.2: Lucintel triad - National Oilwell Varco, Inc
Table 7.3: Financial benchmarking of National Oilwell Varco, Inc against best and
against top 3 and top 10 industry players' average
Table 7.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 7.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 7.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 7.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 8. Company Profile of Saipem S.p.A.
Table 8.1: Market served - Saipem S.p.A.
Table 8.2: Lucintel triad - Saipem S.p.A.
Table 8.3: Financial benchmarking of Saipem S.p.A. against best and against
Top 3 and top 10 industry players' average
Table 8.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 8.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 8.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 8.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
CHAPTER 9. Company Profile of Schlumberger Limited
Table 9.1: Markets served - Schlumberger Limited
Table 9.2: Lucintel triad - Schlumberger Limited
Table 9.3: Financial benchmarking of Schlumberger Limited against best and
against top 3 and top 10 industry players' average
Table 9.4: Strategic execution – product positioning by segment
Table 9.5: Strategic execution – perceived customer value / quality
Table 9.6: Strategic execution – promotion / communications
Table 9.7: Strategic execution – product distribution by region
To order this report:
Oil_and_Gas_energy Industry: Top Five Global Oil and Gas Field Equipment and Services Companies: Performance, Strategies, and Competitive Analysis
Contact Nicolas: [email protected]
US: (805)-652-2626
Intl: +1 805-652-2626
SOURCE Reportlinker
Share this article