DALLAS, Oct. 17, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- On October 11, 2016, the United States Supreme Court denied review of the California Supreme Court's decision in The Gillette Company and Subs. v. California Franchise Tax Board,1 the leading case among challenges to the Multistate Tax Compact income apportionment formula. The issue was whether Gillette was required to use the state's four-factor, double-weighted sales apportionment formula or could elect the equally weighted, three-factor apportionment formula under the Multistate Tax Compact.
Gillette was originally successful at the California Court of Appeal, but the decision was later reversed by the California Supreme Court.2 Gillette subsequently filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, but the petition was rejected. For Gillette, this case is over for now.
The Franchise Tax Board will now begin to address the taxpayers who have filed approximately $750 million in refund claims placed on hold while Gillette was pending. According to spokesman Chris Smith, "the Franchise Tax Board is developing guidance for any potentially affected taxpayers and will release that shortly."
On a national level, four other states are addressing the issue of whether the Multistate Tax Compact is a binding contract. Apportionment election cases are currently pending in Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, and Texas. The Oregon Supreme Court is still reviewing a decision of the Oregon Tax Court on this issue. If this, or any other state, allows the Multistate Tax Compact election in any decision, the United States Supreme Court may accept a review of this issue to settle the controversy.
Although all appeals have been exhausted in Gillette, other refund claims filed by taxpayers may still have value. Please contact us if you have any questions about a pending claim for this issue.
1 U.S. Supreme Court Dkt. No. 15-1442.
2 Gillette Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 62 Cal. 4th 468 (2015).
Ryan is an award-winning global tax services firm, with the largest indirect and property tax practices in North America and the seventh largest corporate tax practice in the United States. With global headquarters in Dallas, Texas, the Firm provides a comprehensive range of state, local, federal, and international tax advisory and consulting services on a multi-jurisdictional basis, including audit defense, tax recovery, credits and incentives, tax process improvement and automation, tax appeals, tax compliance, and strategic planning. Ryan is a five-time recipient of the International Service Excellence Award from the Customer Service Institute of America (CSIA) for its commitment to world-class client service. Empowered by the dynamic myRyan work environment, which is widely recognized as the most innovative in the tax services industry, Ryan's multi-disciplinary team of more than 2,100 professionals and associates serves over 12,000 clients in more than 40 countries, including many of the world's most prominent Global 5000 companies. More information about Ryan can be found at ryan.com.
TECHNICAL INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Mark S. Nachbar
Mary F. Bernard
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-supreme-court-denies-review-of-gillette-v-california-franchise-tax-board-300345789.html