When it Comes to Inclusion, Are Film Reviewers Rotten or Fresh?

LOS ANGELES, June 11, 2018 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Films like Crazy Rich Asians, The Spy Who Dumped Me, BlacKkKlansman, and The Happytime Murders are poised to provide a much-needed dose of diversity to theaters this summer. But as audiences look to critical reviews to determine if these movies are worth the ticket price, what perspectives are available? A new study reveals that the film reviewers are unlikely to be as diverse as the casts they are critiquing.

The report, titled "Critic's Choice?" is the first from Dr. Stacy L. Smith and the USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative to investigate inclusion among film reviewers, and examines access and opportunity for film critics. The report uses reviews of the 100 top grossing films of 2017 posted on the site Rotten Tomatoes to assess gender and race/ethnicity of critics, finding that reviewers are overwhelmingly white and male.

Only 22.2% of the 19,559 reviews evaluated were written by females, with 77.8% crafted by male critics. This represents a gender ratio of 3.5 males to every 1 female reviewer. White critics wrote 82% of the reviews and critics from underrepresented racial/ethnic backgrounds authored 18%. However, when the researchers examined both gender and underrepresented status, they found that white male critics wrote substantially more reviews (63.9%) than their white female (18.1%) or underrepresented male (13.8%) peers. Underrepresented female critics only wrote 4.1% of reviews included in the sample.

"The very individuals who are attuned to the under and misrepresentation of females on screen and behind the camera are often left out of the conversation and critiques," said Dr. Smith, founder and director of the Annenberg Inclusion Initiative. "The publicity, marketing, and distribution teams in moviemaking have an opportunity to change this quickly by increasing the access and opportunities given to women of color as film reviewers."

Similar results emerged when the researchers focused on individuals Rotten Tomatoes designated as "Top Critics." Of the 3,359 reviews by top critics, 76% were written by males and 24% by females. Underrepresented top critics wrote 11.2% of the reviews compared to 88.8% by white top critics. When gender and underrepresented status were examined simultaneously, top film reviews written by white males outnumbered those by underrepresented females by nearly 27 to 1, as reviews by women of color amounted to only 2.5% of those by top critics while white males wrote 67.3%. White females wrote 21.5% and underrepresented male critics 8.7% of top reviews.

"Even among top critics, the words of white and male critics fill a greater share of the conversation than females and people of color," said Marc Choueiti, the study's lead author. "Re-examining the definition of a top critic or simply casting a wider net can be the opportunity to open up and diversify the voices heard in the critic space."

The researchers assessed the percentage of female and underrepresented film reviewers for each movie studied. Not one of the 100 films achieved gender-balance in the critics pool. The 36 female-driven movies in 2017 the team identified were similarly imbalanced. Seventy percent of these films were reviewed by groups of critics in which women amounted to less than 30% of reviewers. Most of the 24 films with underrepresented leads were assessed by a group of critics in which 20% or fewer reviewers were from underrepresented backgrounds.

The percentage of women and people of color reviewing as top critics per film was also calculated. While a handful of female-driven movies achieved proportional representation of female top critics, none featured underrepresented critics in proportion to the population. Most strikingly, women of color were completely absent as top critics from 45 of the 100 films analyzed, 19 or 52.8% of the female-driven films assessed, and 9 or 37.5% of the movies with underrepresented lead characters.

"This report reveals the absence of women of color working as reviewers—especially on movies built around female and underrepresented leads," said Dr. Smith. "We have seen the ramifications of an industry in which the content sold to audiences is created and reviewed by individuals who are primarily white men. Creating inclusive hiring practices at every stage of the filmmaking and review process is essential to meeting business imperatives and ensuring that we see diverse perspectives reflected in society."

Critics may review multiple films throughout the year, so the researchers measured the number of individual film critics. Of the more than 1,600 individuals working throughout the year, white males were roughly half (53.2%), white females about a quarter (23%), underrepresented males were 14.8%, and underrepresented females were 8.9% of all critics. The numbers were similar for individual top critics.

It's no surprise then, that across all critics, white males wrote the highest average number of reviews each year, at 14.3. Underrepresented male critics composed an average of 11.1, white females an average of 9.4, and underrepresented females only 5.6 reviews on average.

The authors propose several solutions for groups that work with or educate critics. Most notably, they offer a set of target inclusion goals for the field. "Groups should think of the phrase 30/30/20/20—this is the U.S. population breakdown for white males, white females, underrepresented males and underrepresented females," said Dr. Smith. "It sets a clear goal for groups who want to make sure that their ranks reflect the world in which we live."

The report is the latest from the USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, and the first in a series of reports on critics. The second report will focus on differences in review content by reviewer gender and/or race/ethnicity, and a third report will examine relationships to box office performance. The newest report can be found online here.

About USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative

Launched by Founder/Director Dr. Stacy L. Smith, the Initiative is globally recognized for its valuable and sought after research-based solutions to advance equality in entertainment. To learn more, visit http://annenberg.usc.edu/aii or follow on Twitter @Inclusionists or Facebook.

CONTACT:  Emily Cavalcanti
Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism
University of Southern California
[email protected] | (213) 740‑0705 (office) | (213) 280-0699 (cell)

SOURCE USC Annenberg