SANTA MONICA, Calif., Aug. 10, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Yesterday, the California Department of Insurance made public a decision by an Administrative Law Judge, issued after an extensive hearing requested by Consumer Watchdog, ordering State Farm to decrease its homeowners insurance rates by 7.0%, and to refund policyholders $85 million for overcharges collected since July 15, 2015. As Consumer Watchdog explained in a news release, "California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones… must decide whether to approve the judge's decision."
This morning, the Insurance Commissioner issued a statement claiming that "no such order has been issued by a judge" and demanding that Consumer Watchdog retract its news release.
For clarification, here is the final page of the Judge's order: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/8-8-16insurancecommissionersnotice.pdf
"Under California's voter-approved Proposition 103, Administrative Law Judges hold hearings and issue decisions and orders as to whether insurance companies are entitled to rate increases, and the Insurance Commissioner is required to adopt, modify or reject those decisions," said Harvey Rosenfield, author of Proposition 103. "State Farm policyholders deserve the $85 million in refunds the company improperly collected from ratepayers, as well as the rate decrease that will save them nearly $156 million per year in the future."
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/consumer-watchdog-posts-judges-state-farm-refund-order-commissioner-must-approve-or-reject-300312167.html
SOURCE Consumer Watchdog