6th District Court of Appeal Issues Unanimous Ruling Stating San Jose's Pension Ballot Measure is "Impermissibly Partisan and Misleading"
SAN JOSE, Calif., April 11, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --
Who: |
Robin Johansen—Remcho, Johansen & Purcell |
Tom Willis—Remcho, Johansen & Purcell |
|
Robert Sapien—President, San Jose Firefighters Local 230 |
|
Jim Unland—President, San Jose Police Officers' Association |
|
Nancy Ostrowski—Senior Strategist, IFPTE Local 21 |
|
What: |
Press Conference to release the 6th District Court of Appeals' decision to reject San Jose's pension modification measure as it was presented by the City . Late yesterday, the California 6th District Court of Appeals agreed with city workers that the ballot title and question drafted by Mayor Reed and his Council allies was "partisan and prejudicial." The court issued a published ruling and awarded costs to the plaintiffs. |
City employees will also demand that the City of San Jose disclose the amount of money San Jose spent in legal fees to its "Dream Team" of high-priced outside attorneys to defend its unlawful pension measure. |
|
When: |
Wednesday, April 11, 2012 |
11:00 AM |
|
Where: |
San Jose Police Officers' Association Hall |
1151 North 4th Street |
|
San Jose, CA 95112 |
SOURCE San Jose Fire Fighters, Local 230
Share this article