LAS VEGAS, Aug. 17, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc., a family-owned footwear company, has filed a 110-page, six-count complaint against 18 individuals associated with Crocs, Inc., including Crocs' founders, current and former directors, and officers. The new lawsuit alleges that they were involved in fraudulently obtaining and enforcing Crocs' cornerstone patents, using them to unlawfully eliminate any real competition, and enabling Crocs to set, fix, and charge supra competitive prices for clog footwear that resulted in American consumers overpaying more than $1 billion. The complaint states that these individuals were personally unjustly enriched by more than $350 million, collectively.
Dawgs also recently expanded its related case against Crocs and one of its founders, Scott Seamans, to include broad antitrust, Lanham Act false advertising, and business tort claims, in addition to its request that the cornerstone Crocs patents be declared invalid and unenforceable. In 2006, Crocs used the patents it fraudulently obtained to secure large bank loans and to raise over $100 million in an initial public offering. Crocs then sued many competitors and retailers.
Key issues in both cases include whether evidence, including the specific allegations in Dawgs' new complaint and the 35 documents attached to it, proves that Crocs and Seamans defrauded the U.S. Patent Office by falsely claiming that Seamans was the true and sole inventor of the patents. Another critical issue is whether Crocs failed to disclose its own prior art and sales. Steven Mann, Dawgs CEO, said "we are going to prove to the jury that Crocs invented nothing and their officers' and directors' entire business strategy was knowingly based on fraudulent patents that never should have issued and the sham litigation that followed." Dawgs' position has already been bolstered by the U.S. Patent Office, which earlier this year rejected Crocs' design patent as invalid for the second time in a Dawgs initiated reexamination proceeding.
Dawgs' new complaint lists some of the individual conspirator defendants' sales of Crocs stock: Ronald Snyder-$130 million; Michael E. Marks-$103 million; Daniel Hart-$3 million; Thomas J. Smach- $10 million; George B. Boedecker Jr.-$22 million; Raymond Croghan -$39 million; Ronald Frasch-$2 million; Jeffrey Lasher-$.9 million; John P. McCarvel-$19 million; Michael Margolis-$26 million. (Other defendants are Andrew Rees, Gregg Ribatt, Andrew Reddyhoff, Lyndon "Duke" Hanson, Donald Lococo, Prakash Melwani, Erik Rebich and Sara Hoverstock.) Dawgs' Chief Legal Officer, Mitchell C. Shapiro, said "Those Crocs directors and officers who knew or should've known that the patents were unenforceable, and who actively and knowingly participated in the alleged scheme and conspiracy, can and should be personally liable for Dawgs' damages, estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars."
DAWGS (www.usadawgs.com) is a diversified designer, manufacturer, and distributor of comfortable, affordable quality footwear and apparel. Headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, DAWGS markets its products through wholesale, retail, catalog, and e-commerce channels. The company's products include casual footwear, work and slip resistant footwear, golf shoes and an everyday basics apparel line.
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/crocs-directors--officers-sued-for-antitrust-300314566.html
SOURCE U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.