The vision set forth by the Vice President underscore our commitment to optimally designed clinical trials that efficiently provide answers to important questions. Given the recent advances in our understanding of cancer and our improved technological capabilities, we are now placing an emphasis on evaluating how we design clinical trials to make the system more efficient to more rapidly deliver safe and effective products for patients.
We are working with stakeholders across government and industry to revisit the criteria used for determining whether a patient is eligible to participate in a trial. Modifying the eligibility criteria could expand the number of people who qualify and therefore open new opportunities for participation and enhance the generalizability of what we learn. Of course, regardless of adjustments, patient safety will remain paramount.
We recently published our perspective on shifting away from the conventional phase one, phase two, and phase three drug development paradigm to a more seamless approach that could expedite the regulatory pathway, providing earlier access to highly effective therapeutic drugs. Adopting this approach could complement FDA's expedited regulatory programs such as breakthrough designation and accelerated approval to get products to patients in the most efficient manner possible.
Another initiative is the use of common control trials. These trials, sharing a common control arm, involve multiple different drugs for the same indication and may involve different companies. When a common control arm is used, it decreases the overall number of patients that need to be recruited and enrolled, optimizing clinical trial resources and potentially decreasing the time it takes to get a new study off the ground.
Encouraging the use of large simple trials is another way to make more efficient use of clinical trial resources. These trials generally use easily-measured endpoints that are well understood, optimizing the collection of data for safety or secondary efficacy endpoints and thus reducing the amount of data needed compared to conventional randomized trials.
As befits the Center of Excellence, one of our top goals is striving for excellence both in drug and device regulation and in emerging oncology science. To achieve that goal we must also collaborate with academia, industry, patient groups, professional societies, and other international regulators. We have already begun this work by scheduling several public meetings that will provide a forum to interact with patients and other stakeholders.
These initiatives will allow us to expedite drug development and approval of truly novel agents that will have a major impact on our patients, while allowing us to make thoughtful decisions regarding the risk-benefit of oncology drugs.
Richard Pazdur, M.D., is FDA's Acting Director, Oncology Center of Excellence
LINK: Evaluating FDA's Approach to Cancer Clinical Trials
Media Inquiries: FDA Office of Media Affairs, 301-796-4540, email@example.com
Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA
Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20151222/317925LOGO
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/evaluating-fdas-approach-to-cancer-clinical-trials-300329525.html
SOURCE U.S. Food and Drug Administration