Fracking Scorecard: Despite Progress, 70 Percent of Oil & Gas Companies Still Fail to Adequately Disclose Risks to Investors

Inadequate Reporting of Methane Leakage Risks Found; BHP Billiton Ranked Best for Overall Disclosure, Hess, Apache, Noble Energy and CONSOL Energy Round Out Top 5.

Dec 17, 2015, 13:43 ET from Investor Environmental Health Network, Washington, D.C. from ,As You Sow, Oakland, CA from

BOSTON, Dec. 17, 2015 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The 2015 edition of an annual investor scorecard ranking the 30 largest oil and gas companies engaged in hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," finds improved risk disclosure by a few companies, even as 70 percent of the energy companies continue to get failing marks.   

Available online at www.disclosingthefacts.org, the third annual Disclosing the Facts report from As You Sow, Boston Common Asset Management, and the Investor Environmental Health Network (IEHN) gauges how well the oil and gas companies do in providing information so that investors can accurately assess how, or whether, these companies manage key risks of fracking, including use of toxic chemicals, water consumption and water quality, waste management, air emissions, methane leakage, and community impacts. 

Eight oil and gas companies made substantial progress in their 2015 disclosures, spurred in part by the earlier scorecards as well as by shareholder engagements involving a wide range of investors. BHP Billiton emerged as the highest-scoring company for the second year in a row -- almost doubling its 2014 score from 18 to 32 points, out of a possible 39 points.  Hess (2nd), Apache (3rd), and Noble (tied for 4th) built on their leadership positions from 2014, disclosing information for about half of the scorecard indicators. Also tied for fourth, CONSOL nearly quadrupled its 2014 score, jumping from five to 19 points by securing third-party certification for compliance with the best practice standards of the Center for Sustainable Shale Development.

In addition to the top five companies, three other companies -- Southwestern Energy Co. (6th), Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (tied for 7th), and QEP Resources, Inc. (tied for 7th) -- made substantial gains in 2015.

Exxon Mobil, the largest of the companies scored, earned 4 points, placing it in the bottom third of the industry.

The new report also scores companies on their disclosure of methane leakage, a key concern because methane is far more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide (CO2).  For the second year in a row, most companies failed to disclose their methane leakage rate or how often they monitor for leakage. In 2015, just five of 30 companies disclosed their methane emission rates from drilling and other operations.  Not a single company reported establishing public methane emission reduction goals. 

"The results of the 2015 scorecard show that corporate disclosure efforts have increased among a core group of industry leaders, despite enormous financial write-offs by the industry," said Richard Liroff, executive director of IEHN. "A handful of companies have clearly responded and risen to our challenge.  Unfortunately, reporting on many of the key metrics is still absent for most companies, making it difficult for investors and the public to assess and compare performance. Methane reporting, in particular, is almost non-existent among the companies we surveyed."

"It is encouraging to see a new company—CONSOL-- jumping into the top five in this year's scorecard.  But we need to see a bigger commitment from the industry in general," said Danielle Fugere, president of As You Sow. "While progress has been made, companies must improve their local disclosures -- their social license to operate is often determined by local concerns such as land and water use, air and water pollution, and nuisances such as noise, light pollution, traffic, and road damage."

"The report shows that several good practices are becoming more widespread. We see companies continue to pursue operating innovations that not only save money but also yield environmental benefits. These include, for example, substituting pipelines for trucks to move water and waste water, enhancing leak detection and repair efforts, and using less, but safer and more cost-effective chemicals," said Steven Heim, managing director of Boston Common Asset Management. "Absent greater disclosure on things like methane, other air emissions, and growing concerns around induced seismicity, investors have no way of crediting those companies making meaningful efforts to adopt best practices and mitigate their impacts on communities and the environment." 

This 2015 scorecard benchmarks the public disclosures of 30 companies on 39 key performance indicators. It distinguishes companies disclosing more about practices and impacts from those disclosing less. The scorecard assesses five areas of environmental, social, and governance metrics emphasizing, on a play-by-play basis, quantitative disclosures for: (1) toxic chemicals; (2) water and waste management; (3) air emissions; (4) community impacts; and (5) management accountability.  It relies solely on publicly available information companies provide on their websites or in corporate financial statements or other reports linked from their websites.

The five most widely reported indicators include: substituting pipelines for trucks to transport water for fracturing (23 companies); declaring a practice to use non-potable water instead of fresh water for fracturing whenever feasible (19 companies); avoiding use of diesel fuel in hydraulic fracturing fluids (16 companies); relying on independent third-party databases to screen potential contractors (16 companies); and linking compensation of senior management to health, safety, and environment metrics (15 companies).

The complete ranking of the 30 companies is as follows:

COMPANY*                                    SCORE (OUT OF POSSIBLE 39 POINTS)**

Company and Ticker Symbol

2015 Score

2014 Score

BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP)

32

18

Hess Corp. (HES)

21

17

Apache Corp. (APA)

20

13

Noble Energy, Inc. (NBL)

19

13

CONSOL Energy Inc. (CNX)

19

5

Southwestern Energy Co. (SWN)

16

2

Anadarko Petroleum Corp. (APC)

15

8

QEP Resources, Inc. (QEP)

15

1

EQT Corp. (EQT)

14

16

ConocoPhillips Corp. (COP)

11

5

Range Resources Corp. (RRC)

11

9

Royal Dutch Shell plc (RDS)

11

9

Occidental Petroleum Corp. (OXY)

10

7

Penn Virginia Corp. (PVA)

10

9

BP plc (BP)

8

6

Cabot Oil & Gas Corp. (COG)

8

8

Encana Corp. (ECA)

8

15

EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG)

8

9

Exco Resources, Inc. (XCO)

7

7

Devon Energy Corp. (DVN)

7

5

Newfield Exploration Co. (NFX)

6

4

Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK)

4

7

Chevron Corp. (CVX)

4

6

Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM)

4

5

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.* (PXD)

3

--

Ultra Petroleum Corp. (UPL)

3

9

WPX Energy, Inc. (WPX)

3

3

Continental Resources, Inc. (CLR)

2

2

Whiting Petroleum Corp. (WLL)

2

3

Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (CRZO)

0

0

*For the 2015 scorecard, Pioneer Natural Resources was substituted for Talisman Energy, Inc., which was acquired by Repsol, S.A.

**2014's scorecard had a total of 35 possible points.

The three most significant scoring changes on indicators between 2014 and 2015 were for: play-by-play reporting of the types of water sources used for fracturing activities (from one to six companies); percentages of wastewater reused for fracturing (from two to seven); and addressing naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs) (from six to 12).

ABOUT THE GROUPS

As You Sow (http://www.asyousow.org/) promotes environmental and social corporate responsibility through shareholder advocacy, coalition building, and innovative legal strategies. Its efforts create large-scale systemic change by establishing sustainable and equitable corporate practices.

Boston Common Asset Management, LLC (http://www.bostoncommonasset.com/) is a sustainable investment firm dedicated to generating competitive financial returns and meaningful improvements in corporate performance on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. We are long-term investors. We believe that markets typically misvalue the timing and magnitude of risks and opportunities presented by ESG factors. Therefore, our investment strategy is to build and grow diversified portfolios using the high-quality but undervalued sustainable stocks that our integrated investment research identifies. As part of this, we look to add value through targeted company and industry engagement efforts.

The Investor Environmental Health Network (http://www.iehn.org) is a collaborative partnership of investment managers and advisors concerned about the impact of corporate practices on environmental health.

The information in this document should not be considered an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, is not designed to be investment advice and should not be relied upon to make investment decisions. We cannot and do not comment on the suitability or profitability of any particular investment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investments involve risk, including the risk of losing principal. Boston Common Asset Management and the mutual funds that it manages may have invested in and may in the future invest in some of the companies mentioned in this report.

Photo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20151217/296979-INFO

 

SOURCE Investor Environmental Health Network, Washington, D.C.; As You Sow, Oakland, CA; and Boston Common Asset Management, Boston