"The Texas program has been approved by the EPA 17 times – an average of once every two years," Murray said. "The relief being sought here goes beyond the authority that Congress granted the EPA under Subtitle D, so the court cannot order to it to act the way that the plaintiffs are requesting."
By filing the D.C. case (Background Environmental Integrity Project et al v. McCarthy) the coalition is asking the EPA to establish rules to ban companies from spreading fracking wastewater on roads or fields and require disposal landfills and ponds to be constructed to prevent pollutants from leaking into groundwater.
The groups argue that under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the EPA must review and revise federal regulations for oil and gas waste disposal every three years. In addition, they want the agency to develop regulations on fracking wastewater disposal in underground injection wells, a practice some have attempted to link to earthquakes in some states.
Allen Gilmer, TIPRO chair and CEO of Drillinginfo, said current rules are more than adequate. "The Texas Railroad Commission and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality require our industry to comply with a comprehensive set of regulations that contain numerous safeguards related to the management of oil and gas waste," he said. "This extensive regulatory framework far exceeds the minimum requirements mandated under the RCRA hazardous waste program."
Meanwhile, TIPRO President Ed Longanecker contended the plaintiffs are likely operating in cooperation with the EPA at the detriment of the industry. "This lawsuit is an example of the sue-and-settle tactics used by anti-oil and natural gas organizations in a larger effort to slow or stop the development of hydrocarbons in our country," he said. "This is yet another attempt to compel the EPA to exceed its regulatory authority with the ultimate goal of reaching a settlement to fuel additional activist campaigns, all at the expense of taxpayers."
Murray and TIPRO believe that the EPA and the plaintiffs will oppose the motion, but that the court will ultimately grant intervention because there are issues of law presented in the case that directly impact oil and gas producers in Texas.
TIPRO is an association representing more than 3,000 independent oil and gas producers and royalty owners in Texas. Formed in 1946, the organization advocates to preserve the ability for independents to explore for and produce oil and natural gas. The association is one of the oldest and largest oil and natural gas advocacy non-profit organizations in the state of Texas. TIPRO's members include small family-owned businesses and the largest publicly traded independent producers, in addition to large and small mineral estates and trusts.
About Haynes and Boone
Haynes and Boone, LLP is an international corporate law firm with offices in Texas, New York, California, Chicago, Denver, Washington, D.C., Mexico City, Shanghai, and the recently announced addition of a London office currently undergoing regulatory approval. With more than 575 lawyers, the firm provides a full spectrum of legal services in technology, financial services, energy and private equity and is ranked among the largest U.S.-based firms by The National Law Journal. The 2016 American Lawyer Corporate Scorecard rated the firm as one of the top two handling equities work for non-U.S. companies.
CONTACT: Douglas R. Bedell
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20151218/297374LOGO
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/haynes-and-boone-files-motion-to-intervene-in-epa-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-texas-oil--gas-industry-group-tipro-300309380.html
SOURCE Haynes and Boone, LLP