Hudson Institute Releases Quarterly Survey of Economics Bloggers
WASHINGTON, Aug. 21, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Top economics bloggers remain downbeat on the U.S. economy, according to the latest quarterly survey conducted by Dr. Tim Kane at Hudson Institute. Three-quarters of 48 ideologically-diverse economics bloggers described the U.S. economy as "mixed," and most of the remainder think it is "facing recession." Six in ten econ bloggers believe the federal government is too involved in the economy, while three in ten think it is about right. Worse, only 6 percent of respondents believe the economy is "better than official government statistics show," while 21 percent think it is worse.
"The policy recommendations of economics bloggers are once again unorthodox, insightful, and beyond political categorization," said Kane, who is launching a new blog with Glenn Hubbard on Thursday, August 23, called BalanceofEconomics.com.
"Giving states the power to set their own minimum wages has broad support (70 percent), even more than repealing Obamacare legislatively (57 percent). Bloggers showed their ideological diversity—strongly opposing using U.S. military force in Syria (77 percent), favoring major Pentagon budget cuts (58 percent), but also calling for a unilateral elimination of U.S. trade barriers (69 percent)."
Summary results can be seen at www.hudson.org/EBS12Q3.
Research highlights include:
- For the first time, the survey picked up some long-term enthusiasm about job growth in the United States. Over the next three years, bloggers anticipate more growth in this category than any other. Global growth has been a constant forecast for this group, but bloggers also anticipate higher inflation and interest rates.
- Mark Thoma (Economist's View) asked a question about Federal Reserve policy, specifically what are the odds that the Fed will start using a rule to set interest rates that targets nominal gross domestic product. Eight of ten economics bloggers believe the odds are "low" to "zero" this will happen.
- A separate question about interest rates found a diverse range of opinions about how they will change in the years ahead. Most respondents think rates will remain depressed, and only 14 percent believe they will rise chaotically, out of control of the central bank.
- A final question from Kane and Hubbard (Balance of Economics) asked the bloggers whether economics are the central cause of the decline and fall of great powers in history—Rome, ancient China, and the empires of Europe—which is the premise of their blog and forthcoming book. Opinion was split 50-50.
Continuing a tradition recommended by technology blogger Robert X. Cringely, the group submitted a series of haiku. This quarter, the haiku answer this riddle: What can economics tell us about the 2012 U.S. election? Entries include:
Time again for votes, Amidst party promises, What is different?
Amol Agrawal, Mostly Economics
The only reason this sucker is close is be- cause Ben's been too tight
Ryan Avent, Free exchange
Ideology not enough, brain cells required. Someone tell Romney.
Robert Cringely, I, Cringely
Summer's bright wishes Pretty flowers Winter sweeps away gently
Atanu Dey, On India's Development
Exciting numbers! Beat The Street's expectations! Later revised down.
Will Franklin, WILLisms.com
Choose between Rand and Republican socialist We the People? No.
Ken Houghton, AngryBear
Four jobless summers Dry up re-election votes As Obama said
Tim Kane, Hudson Institute / Balance of Economics
Policy—who cares? It's hatred of the other that makes people vote
Arnold Kling, econLog
Snow falls on buried Memories of promises To make the nation rich
Megan McArdle, Asymmetrical Information
Hope springs eternal Who can excite the masses? Answer? Campaign bucks!
Jeff Miller, A Dash of Insight
The new Euro zone Same as the old Euro zone Naked emperor!
Michael Munger, Kids Prefer Cheese
Romney better pray Unemployment still 8 plus Come election day
Nick Schulz, AEIdeas
Bain: PE, VC? Matters not. The real issues No one talks about.
Wade Roush, Xconomy
We dug you a hole. We tipped over your ladder. Soon we will join you.
Andrew Samwick, Andrew Samwick's Blog
Nothing to see here. Just move along. And vote. For Me. Your president.
David Tufte, voluntaryXchange
these are our choices? for now, this moment, perhaps. but what will follow?
Steve Waldman, interfluidity
Ugly election Distorting issues by both Can we just ignore?
John Whitehead, Environmental Economics
Trust not either side Both gambling your future With blind ambition
David Zetland, Aguanomics
Hudson Institute is a nonpartisan policy research organization dedicated to innovative research and analysis promoting security, prosperity, and freedom. http://www.hudson.org
For more information, please contact:
James Bologna: 202-974-6456, email@example.com
SOURCE Hudson Institute