PR Newswire: news distribution, targeting and monitoring
 

J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Decreases in Power Quality and Price Satisfaction Among Residential Electric Utility Customers Are Mitigated by Steady Operational Improvements

 
 

Majority of U.S. Electric Utility Customers Support Nuclear Energy, Even after Japan Crisis

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif., July 13, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Although residential electric utility customers are less satisfied with power quality, reliability and price than in 2010, improvements in operational-related aspects have largely mitigated the negative effects on overall satisfaction, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2011 Electric Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study(SM) released today.

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20050527/LAF028LOGO-a)

The study measures customer satisfaction with electric utility companies by examining six key factors: power quality and reliability; price; billing and payment; corporate citizenship; communications; and customer service.

Residential customer satisfaction with electric utility companies averages 628 on a 1,000-point scale in 2011—a slight decrease from 630 in 2010. The two most important factors contributing to satisfaction, power quality and reliability and price, have declined from 2010 by five and eight points, respectively.

However, satisfaction with other factors has been steadily increasing. In particular, the communications and corporate citizenship factors have achieved the greatest gains in 2011, each improving by six points from 2010. These areas have also improved significantly between 2009 and 2011—increasing by 21 and 16 points, respectively.

"Operational improvements have helped electric utilities counterbalance the negative effects of weather and economic storms on overall satisfaction," said Chris Oberle, senior director of the energy and utility practice at J.D. Power and Associates. "In particular, utilities have made great strides in improving their customer communications and their billing and payment processes, both of which are crucial to elevating satisfaction."

The study ranks large and midsize utility companies in four geographic regions: East, Midwest, South and West. Companies in the midsize utility segments serve between 125,000 and 499,999 residential customers, while companies in the large utility segment serve 500,000 or more residential customers.

East Region

Among large utilities in the East region, Central Maine Power ranks highest for a fourth consecutive year. Following in the segment rankings are PPL Electric Utilities and New York State Electric & Gas, respectively.

In the East region midsize utility segment, Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative ranks highest for a fourth consecutive year, followed by Penn Power and Central Vermont Public Service, respectively.

Midwest Region

MidAmerican Energy ranks highest among large utility companies in the Midwest region for a fourth consecutive year. Xcel Energy—Midwest follows MidAmerican Energy, while KCP&L ranks third in the segment.

Omaha Public Power District ranks highest among midsize utility companies in the Midwest region for a fourth consecutive year and receives an award in the study for an 11th consecutive year. Following Omaha Public Power District in the segment are Indianapolis Power & Light Company and Kentucky Utilities, respectively.

South Region

Oklahoma Gas and Electric ranks highest among large utility companies in the South region. Following Oklahoma Gas and Electric in the rankings are CPS Energy and Progress Energy Carolinas, respectively.

Jackson EMC ranks highest among midsize utility companies in the South region for a second consecutive year, followed by Santee Cooper and NOVEC, respectively.

West Region

Salt River Project ranks highest among large utility companies in the West region for a fourth consecutive year and receives an award in the study for a 10th consecutive year. Following Salt River Project in the segment rankings are Sacramento Municipal Utility District and Portland General Electric, respectively.

Clark Public Utilities ranks highest among midsize utility companies in the West region for a fourth consecutive year, followed by Snohomish County PUD and Colorado Springs Utilities, respectively.

Additional Study Findings

The study also includes the following key findings about the attitudes of electric residential utility customers toward nuclear energy:

  • More than one-half of customers (57%) indicate they support building nuclear power plants in the U.S. This percentage is even higher among customers who say they are aware of the recent nuclear crisis in Japan, with 60 percent of these customers supporting building nuclear power plants domestically.
  • Support of nuclear power is high—averaging nearly 70 percent—among customers who indicate a nuclear power plant is located in or close to their community (within a 50-mile radius).
  • Three-fourths of customers say that lowering the country's dependence on foreign oil is the primary benefit of nuclear power.

The 2011 Electric Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study is based on responses from more than 98,000 online interviews conducted from July 2010 through May 2011 among residential customers of the 124 largest electric utility brands across the United States, which collectively represent more than 93 million households.

Customer Satisfaction Index Ranking

(Based on a 1,000-point scale)

East Region: Large Segment


Central Maine Power

638

PPL Electric Utilities

636

New York State Electric & Gas

621

Penelec

618

NSTAR

617

PECO

617

Allegheny Power

614

Baltimore Gas and Electric

611

Con Edison Company of New York

610

Public Service Electric and Gas

607

East Large Segment Average

606

Jersey Central Power & Light

603

National Grid

602

Duquesne Light

595

Connecticut Light & Power

588

Long Island Power Authority

582

Appalachian Power

570

Pepco

556



East Region: Midsize Segment


Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative

686

Penn Power

636

Central Vermont Public Service

623

Rochester Gas and Electric

620

Western Massachusetts Electric

617

Met-Ed

615

East Midsize Segment Average

608

Public Service of New Hampshire

605

Delmarva Power

604

Atlantic City Electric

594

Central Hudson Gas & Electric

593

Orange & Rockland

587

United Illuminating

586



Midwest Region: Large Segment


MidAmerican Energy

679

Xcel Energy—Midwest

651

KCP&L

644

We Energies

642

Alliant Energy

640

Indiana Michigan Power

638

Westar Energy

638

Ohio Edison

632

Detroit Edison

630

Midwest Large Segment Average

621

Duke Energy—Midwest

620

AEP Ohio

615

Consumers Energy

614

Ameren Missouri

611

Ameren Illinois

598

ComEd

590

The Illuminating Company

586



Midwest Region: Midsize Segment


Omaha Public Power District

685

Indianapolis Power & Light Company

650

Kentucky Utilities

649

Louisville Gas & Electric

645

Wisconsin Public Service

640

Midwest Midsize Segment Average

627

Dayton Power & Light

609

Toledo Edison

604

Vectren

596

Empire District Electric

587

NIPSCO

585

Kentucky Power

574



South Region: Large Segment


Oklahoma Gas and Electric

669

CPS Energy

667

Progress Energy Carolinas

654

FPL

652

Alabama Power

649

Duke Energy—Carolinas

646

Dominion Virginia Power

644

South Large Segment Average

643

South Carolina Electric & Gas

641

Entergy Louisiana

636

Entergy Arkansas

634

Georgia Power

634

Tampa Electric

617

Progress Energy Florida

612



South Region: Midsize Segment


Jackson EMC

711

Santee Cooper

704

NOVEC

699

Sawnee EMC

690

CoServ

680

SECO Energy

674

EPB

669

Xcel Energy—South

665

Clay Electric Cooperative

661

Mississippi Power

661

Huntsville Utilities

659

Entergy Mississippi

654

Middle Tennessee EMC

652

Entergy Texas

649

Cobb EMC

647

Pedernales Electric Cooperative

645

Gulf Power

642

South Midsize Segment Average

641

Austin Energy

640

Withlacoochee River Electric Cooperative

638

Public Service Co. of Oklahoma

635

Cleco Power

631

Southwestern Electric Power

630

Orlando Utilities Commission

629

Lee County Electric Cooperative

625

Rappahannock Electric Cooperative

621

Nashville Electric Service

615

Knoxville Utilities Board

612

Memphis Light, Gas and Water

595

JEA

586

Entergy New Orleans

569



West Region: Large Segment


Salt River Project

707

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

682

Portland General Electric

678

Rocky Mountain Power

675

APS

669

Pacific Power

665

Southern California Edison

650

West Large Segment Average

640

Puget Sound Energy

637

San Diego Gas & Electric

637

Xcel Energy—West

617

NV Energy

616

Pacific Gas and Electric

615

LADWP

600



West Region: Midsize Segment


Clark Public Utilities

712

Snohomish County PUD

676

Colorado Springs Utilities

672

Idaho Power

668

Tacoma Power

665

Seattle City Light

664

West Midsize Segment Average

651

Tucson Electric Power

644

Intermountain Rural Electric Association

642

Avista

640

NorthWestern Energy

635

El Paso Electric

626

PNM

615



About J.D. Power and Associates

Headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif., J.D. Power and Associates is a global marketing information services company operating in key business sectors including market research, forecasting, performance improvement, Web intelligence and customer satisfaction.  The company's quality and satisfaction measurements are based on responses from millions of consumers annually.  For more information on car reviews and ratings, car insurance, health insurance, cell phone ratings, and more, please visit JDPower.com. J.D. Power and Associates is a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies.

About The McGraw-Hill Companies

Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a leading global financial information and education company that helps professionals and students succeed in the Knowledge Economy.  With leading brands including Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill Education, Platts energy information services and J.D. Power and Associates, the Corporation has approximately 21,000 employees with more than 280 offices in 40 countries.  Sales in 2010 were $6.2 billion.  Additional information is available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.

Media Relations Contacts:
Jeff Perlman; Brandware Public Relations; Malibu, Calif.; (818) 317-3070; jperlman@brandwaregroup.com
Syvetril Perryman; J.D. Power and Associates; Westlake Village, Calif.; (805) 418-8103; media.relations@jdpa.com

No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates. www.jdpower.com/corporate

SOURCE J.D. Power and Associates

Back to top

RELATED LINKS
http://www.jdpower.com

Custom Packages

Browse our custom packages or build your own to meet your unique communications needs.

Start today.

 

PR Newswire Membership

Fill out a PR Newswire membership form or contact us at (888) 776-0942.

Learn about PR Newswire services

Request more information about PR Newswire products and services or call us at (888) 776-0942.

Featured Video

 
  • Print
  • Email
  •   RSS
  • Share it  
  • Blog it  
  • Blog Search  

Journalists and Bloggers

Visit PR Newswire for Journalists for releases, photos, ProfNet experts, and customized feeds just for Media.

View and download archived video content distributed by MultiVu on The Digital Center.

Free Investing Newsletter from Investor Uprising!

Learn to navigate the world's financial system and profit from leading companies.  

Register for Investor Uprising, the people's investment site, for a free weekly newsletter, information, education and premium research including our latest IU Confidential Report - "All That Glitters: The Ultimate Gold Report".

Advanced Search
Search
  
  1. Products & Services
  2. Knowledge Center
  3. Browse News Releases
  4. Contact PR Newswire