Nurses Fired; Flu Vaccine Exemptions Denied on Dubious Pretext, Doctors' Group Says
TUCSON, Ariz., Jan. 7, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Eight employees, including at least three veteran nurses, have been fired by Goshen Hospital, in Goshen, Indiana, for refusing the flu vaccine. A religious exemption is available, but was denied because these employees did not meet the criteria for religious protection established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
"What gives the EEOC the authority to define what constitutes an acceptable religious belief?" asks Jane M. Orient, M.D., executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).
AAPS opposes vaccine mandates, believing that patients and healthcare workers have the right to refuse medical treatment.
Hospitals may agree with the right to refuse treatment, but assert the right to determine conditions for employment. They cite concerns about protecting patients from transmission of influenza by unvaccinated staff.
"The scientific and religious concerns are in a sense backward," Dr. Orient stated. "Advocates of the mandate are full of evangelical zeal and are quick to portray skeptics as wicked and selfish. It's like a secular religion, based on faith in vaccine efficacy and safety."
In fact, the scientific case for flu vaccine mandates is very weak, Dr. Orient points out in an article in the winter issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. A handful of studies show slight benefit in long-term care facilities. Hospitals have not been studied. Safety data are limited, and there are no long-term studies of the effects of annual vaccination. Serious, lifelong disability occasionally occurs. There is no evidence showing that vaccinated workers are less likely to transmit virus.
Studies and advisory committees are compromised by conflicts of interest, and some researchers cite "evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions."
Do hospitals have a financial incentive from the government to force workers to be vaccinated? There should be greater transparency for the real reasons behind such heavy-handedness by hospitals.
"When allowed freedom to decide, more than half of medical workers decline annual flu vaccine," Dr. Orient pointed out. Unconvinced by pharmaceutical companies and public health authorities, these workers apparently decide that benefit doesn't outweigh risk.
"If people can't reject the product, where's the incentive to develop better, more extensively tested products?" Dr. Orient asks.
Many of the risks in vaccines derive from animal products they contain. Interestingly, vegans are generally granted an exemption without questions.
"Forcing workers to choose between their employment and vaccine is not only disrespectful of individual rights," said Dr. Orient. "It represents the triumph of authority over evidence in medicine."
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a national organization representing physicians in all specialties founded in 1943, publishes the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
SOURCE Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)
More by this Source
AAPS Urges Supreme Court Not To Impede Medical Innovation
Apr 14, 2013, 23:16 ET
Browse our custom packages or build your own to meet your unique communications needs.
Learn about PR Newswire services
Request more information about PR Newswire products and services or call us at (888) 776-0942.