The appeal charges that Judge Johnson ignored established New Jersey law. Instead of determining whether the experts used sound and established methodologies to reach their conclusions – as required by New Jersey Law – the judge assumed a jury's "fact-finder" role and based his ruling on personal opinions of the experts' conclusions, according to the appellate brief.
"The trial court's decision to preclude the testimony turns New Jersey's law of expert admissibility on its head ... The court substituted its own judgment for that of the scientists and usurped the role of the jury by holding what was in effect a bench trial on the issue of causation," according to the appeal filed by attorneys from the Beasley Allen Law Firm.
The New Jersey lawsuits are among thousands filed across the United States that contend that Johnson & Johnson and talc supplier Imerys Talc America failed to warn women about known ovarian cancer risks associated with genital application of talc products like Johnson & Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower to Shower.
About Beasley Allen Law Firm
Headquartered in Montgomery, Ala., Beasley Allen is comprised of more than 70 attorneys and 200 support staff. One of the largest Plaintiffs law firms in the country, Beasley Allen is a national leader in civil litigation, with verdicts and settlements in excess of $26 billion. Beasley Allen was one of only 12 firms in the nation named by Law360 to its Most Feared Plaintiffs Firms list in 2015, and the firm was included on the National Law Journal Midsize Law Firm Hot List and the NLJ Elite Trial Lawyers List in 2014. For more information about our firm, please visit our website at www.beasleyallen.com.
(334) 201-2311 voice or text
To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ovarian-cancer-patients-appeal-ruling-in-jj-talc-lawsuits-in-new-jersey-300399585.html
SOURCE Beasley Allen Law Firm