The Rise in Structural Unemployment

CHICAGO, Sep. 16 /PRNewswire/ -- "There is a deeper and broader transformation currently taking place in the labor market – at least a portion of the rise in unemployment that we are seeing is becoming more structural (long-term) rather than just cyclical in nature. The so-called 'natural rate' of unemployment (the rate of unemployment consistent with the economy growing at its full potential), in particular, has risen from the lows that we were able to enjoy in the latter part of the 1990s and earlier part of the 2000s," says Adolfo Laurenti, deputy chief economist at Mesirow Financial, in his September issue of Themes on the Global Markets.

In his September newsletter, Laurenti notes the importance of distinguishing between cyclical and structural unemployment, which may be well-defined in theory, but it is not at all clear in practice.

"Without a robust empirical rule with which to draw conclusions, we can only proceed by a thorough investigation of the dynamics in the labor market, and we believe that circumstantial evidence is compelling in its suggestion that at least a portion of the rise in unemployment is more structural than cyclical in nature:

• The length of unemployment is rising. As of today, 2.6 million Americans have been without a job for more than six months.
• According to surveys of people filing for unemployment benefits, the vast majority of the newly-unemployed see the separation from their last employer as permanent, rather than temporary.
• Job openings have stabilized, and actually begun to rise, while the ranks of the unemployed have failed to shrink.
• The right professional skills are not easily available. A recurring theme in the press and media is the mismatch of skills in the labor market.
• Finally, there is the recognition that some of the shifts in the composition of activities within the economy are likely to be permanent."

The newsletter also contrasts our situation with the rise in structural unemployment that we saw in Europe in the 1970s and 1980s. (Ours is not as bad.)

"Is the U.S. following in Europe's dysfunctional footsteps? For the most part, no. The labor market in the U.S. remains much more flexible than in Europe along several important dimensions. The mechanisms of wage-setting are less centralized, and American firms and workers have more flexibility and latitude to respond to adverse shocks."

"Learning from the European mistakes, we should resist short-term fixes that would make the labor market more rigid, preventing the market to adjust to the new economic realities. Instead, we should focus on programs that facilitate, rather than hinder, the underlying changes taking place in the economy," concludes Laurenti.

The September issue of Themes on the Global Markets, as well as archived issues, can be found at mesirowfinancial.com.

SOURCE Mesirow Financial